Residential Zones. <br />EC 9.2700 Purpose of R-1 Low-Density Residential Zone. `The purpose of the R-1 Low- <br />Density Residential zone is to implement the Mato Plan by providing areas for low-density residential use. <br />The R-1 zone is designed for one-family dwellings with some allowance for other types of dwellings, and is <br />also intended to provide a limited range of non-tesidential uses that can enhance the quality. of low :density <br />residential areas. <br />+ '0MC's proposed project does not meet the intent at the current proposed size of 28 units with <br />a 4,000 square foot commons house with 47 parking spaces. <br />EC 9.2740 as sited in the September Staff Report the proposed OMC development is not reasonably <br />compatible with the adjacent and nearby land uses. <br />EC 9.2750 Residential Zone development Standards. Table EC 9.2750 Zone Development <br />Standards Fences (14). Maximum Height within interior Yard Setbacks, R-1 is 6 feet according to the <br />Table in this code. <br />OMC has asked to modify the fencing requirement of 6 feet to an 8 feet concrete fence. They <br />call the modification a' green fence because they will have shrubs/vegetation growing up it. <br />They are proposing a giant concrete compound. <br />Planned Unit Development,' Tentative Plan <br />EC 9.8300 Putpose of Planned Unit Development. The planned unit development (PT-JD) <br />provisions ate designed to provide a high degree of flexibility in the design of the site and mix of land uses, <br />potential environmental impact, and ate intended to: <br />(1) Create a suitable environment that includes: <br />(c) A variety of dwelling types that help meet the needs of all income groups in the community. <br />• The proposed dwelling types by OMC exceed all the income groups in our community. <br />(2) Create comprehensive site plans for geographic areas of sufficient size to provide development <br />at least equal in quality to those that ate achieved through the traditional lot by lot development that ate <br />reasonably compatible with the surrounding area. , <br />• An actual comprehensive site plan would not show this proposed development is nearly close <br />to the quality of the traditional surrounding area not is it compatible with the surrounding area. <br />It is too oversized for this infrastructure it has to pass through. Again I stress we need a Traffic <br />Study Analysis <br />EC 9.9610 River Road - Santa Clara Urban Facilities Plan Policies. <br />(1) General Land Use. Minimize lane use conflicts by promoting compatibility between land uses, <br />especially among residential, commercial-indusitial, and commercial - agricultural uses. (Policy 1) <br />• As existing home owners, in this area and community we are asking OMC's project to be <br />compatible with our existing residential homes. <br />• We ate trying to avoid`conflict, mediation was asked for but OMC's keyindividuals, <br />developers, architect, financial individuals didn't attend mediation. We are trying to ask them to <br />show good faith by respecting out existing neighborhood. <br />983 <br />