Ms. Becky Taylor <br />Arguriient-' in- Opposition- of PDT'134,: Post New rvider ce Deadline <br />Access Engineering Letter, dated Octoher 15th; 2013- <br />New evidence. was'prESented in. this Ietteir,.specifically ROW. widths and pa' <br />393` ofV.o_l. 2 of the ITE <br />gle- <br />Ninth Nanual. This should not be allowed iritrr the argament portion of the hear':.rigs pro.cesst :Also irr <br />the letter, the'aut.hohohce again eXpla nsthepeak hour trips and }iow.theydeteen ine:th4the increase <br />from the•development will not be above the threshold:reduirirtq,:a TIA.:As presented;above this..is•nnly a <br />poetfon-of the code-reguiiement for the PUD regardi"ng traffic.: Asstated'in the, NO% the increased <br />traffic will decrease safety and:-it wlll. be:inore thanA n iniiinaf. impact do ft.sdrrdubdrn~-helg 116.0d. <br />The-applicant ttas not piovid•ed'any: new evidence b-eyond4he peak-hourtrip generation:calculation.and <br />the Tlq requireirtent. Tlie evidrYnce ,p'roY ded in the NOR,s-Kows wliy this deve[opmentwil.l cause tpgre <br />thbn a Miuiinal fm.pact.on the neighborhood.-arid. why-it., will not lie-safe. eccgTding to, clty° fahdards: <br />1N01 ll x6rr's:Lettei datedQctob..er9";SUh:mittedp..n Qctober.l6.t";2013 also- <br />This fetter do not.address'how-the fill will. be. contained:wittii r the site; Specifically, it does: not inforr <br />the decision about'tttl ether retilirting walls are;needed, which would open up-aft ui e-valtaafed`con'ditiptr <br />about f'A.l,.placement.onthceus►er:easemer_.tf:pr public land-or fhe bulk; cpnpatiiiility, vi'ew$a,and <br />screei?irig,. <br />Mr.;DNon expta_insthattfwlill will:nflt be placed,on pubic Ian&yet!here:is no_ne-W eytdence presenti' <br />how this WIII lie done.. Also,, on the*.revised Site plan &ated.CfO'9m 8iirlduig:2 W4s.mo_V.ed. a4bot.2 feet <br />west;,providing. about:2 feet of distance from the. east. s deof the building to the west edge of the sewer <br />easercrent; and abaut:.1 feet:from tl,ie:east propel ter litre.; As slatQd_.in'the. N&I fill -will.-We to be <br />plaeecl in tfie floodpl"airi atttae eastern;propeity bourielary a- bd in a:rder -o.suppoir a large,t~aw[ house: <br />braildln.g..itwili.haveto.beslopedor,retained.,This-, -.1._rerr~einstrueandthexeisnonevlfevidenrq <br />preserited;as to: how :the fill will be, retained.orsloped. Therefore wj~ do riot knoui if it is geotec€rrilcally <br />fea5lble•to place 3;feetof filt:wfthin I2 tate.ral'feet ofthef:east:.latoperty line; wittioutfurther information: <br />such as refiairringwaits, p, rap; standard soil sloping , .A5 poirited q.u.t irr tfie;.NOit the fli v~iotlid cer a[nly <br />be oti:the Ctty's sevuer easeriierit unless tere.was.a retafi3irig iiriall or tall cori'crefe footing, rre~i}ier:o <br />whichhas:beenpresented`intherecord. Thatisst.4true.. <br />A eoner~ete utall,_rata[riing rnJall; o~''rip.rap:Glioiild'not.only be iin-scenie:ir" the Oree;nw;iV' but lt,would also <br />ftu ke;-the e*s~ng bufld-hg appear. much taller than. just tlie.proposed-28 ft fe:ight.(whrch? s presented in <br />tf e Npit).. Sincethere ha's been rio iiew evltlence of,scre0*id9:oh the eastprapetty Brie, the limited- <br />informatlon provided'by°the-applicanton 1711in~ttie:flocrctplaio.still callsinfo question-the=issues.abou° -rill: <br />erh the sever ea"sement.or on public Mhd.and also:t}ie lack-of screening anthe east side of the property:. <br />Site plari Siitimi#ted` oft` Qet 9 - <br />The revised site plan-from.-Oct 5.preserits the.garage buildings moved off the property. lin'e with the <br />apprQpr(a,te - ft.setback. 'This:ineetson gf.. Ift cohditio'ls`hr th.e City .sfaffi_report.and iY appears.fa not: <br />Have beeria3 devastating as wasclainiecEy,the applicaiit.iritfie initial`application; page.420#4.6. There <br />i <br />458 <br />