16 <br />1 (Rec 189), still less than the standard 45-foot ROW that the findings state is <br />2 necessary for adequate and safe access. 4 The Decision cites to no basis for <br />3 allowing the PUD to be developed with less ROW than the findings state is <br />4 necessary, and the decision offers no explanation for how or when the <br />5 additional 2.5 feet of ROW would be dedicated. <br />6 The decision must be remanded for the City to impose an adequate <br />7 condition of approval, consistent with its findings, that requires a 45-foot ROW <br />8 for at least 50 feet adjacent to the proposed PUD site prior to PUD <br />9 development, or explain why a 42.5-foot ROW is adequate. (The necessary <br />10 condition does not have to require the developer to dedicate additional ROW.) <br />11 Subassignment of Error I.B. The Decision did not properly apply adopted <br />12 street standards to Oakleigh Lane, as required by EC 9.8320(5)(a), <br />13 EC 9.6820(4) and EC 9.6870. <br />14 EC 9.8320(5) requires the proposed PUD to provide "safe and adequate" <br />15 transportation systems through compliance with EC 9.6800 through EC 9.6875. <br />16 Standards for cul-de-sacs. EC 9.6820 establishes standards for cul-de-sacs <br />17 and emergency vehicle turnarounds. The following standards apply to Oakleigh <br />18 Lane, which is a cul-de-sac over 1,000 feet long. <br />4 See conditions 3 and 4 of the Hearings Official decision. Rec 189. <br />