13 <br />1 ensuring that Oakleigh Lane would be adequate, safe, pose no significant risk <br />2 to others and did not have impediments to emergency response vehicles. Yet <br />3 the Decision does just that. The Decision fails in numerous ways to provide <br />4 adequate findings. (Sunnyside Neighborhood v. Clackamas Co. Comm., 280 Or <br />5 3, 211 569 P.2d 1063 (1977).) The Decision also fails to adopt adequate <br />6 conditions of approval. <br />7 Since Oakleigh Lane is the only street that provides access to the <br />8 proposed PUD, it follows that the entire length of Oakleigh Lane - along <br />9 which all traffic to and from the proposed PUD must travel - must be adequate, <br />10 safe, pose no significant risk and not be an impediment to emergency response. <br />11 It was unreasonable for the City to interpret the applicable code to apply <br />12 approval criteria and standards to only the short segment of Oakleigh Lane <br />13 adjacent to the proposed development site. The City's interpretation leaves <br />14 uncertain whether or not Oakleigh Lane will actually function in an adequate <br />15 and safe manner after the proposed PUD is developed. <br />16 The following sections demonstrate that, based on the City's adopted <br />17 street standards, the Eugene PWD evaluation of Oakleigh Lane and the <br />18 preponderance of evidence in the record, Oakleigh Lane would fail to provide <br />19 safe and adequate use unless widened and improved; and that the Decision <br />20 failed to adopt adequate conditions of approval to ensure that sufficient right- <br />