II <br />impacted by a proposed PUD; and the subsections of this approval criterion <br />2 provide specific standards that must be met for approval. <br />3 EC 9.8320(5) The PUD provides safe and adequate transportation systems <br />4 through compliance with the following: <br />5 (a) EC 9.6800 through EC 9.6875 Standards for Streets, Alleys, and <br />6 Other Public Ways (not subject to modifications set forth in <br />7 subsection (11) below). <br />8 (b) Pedestrian, bicycle and transit circulation, including related facilities, <br />9 as needed among buildings and related uses on the development site, <br />10 as well as to adjacent and nearby residential areas, transit stops, <br />11 neighborhood activity centers, office parks, and industrial parks, <br />12 provided the city makes findings to demonstrate consistency with <br />13 constitutional requirements. "Nearby" means uses within 1/4 mile that <br />14 can reasonably be expected to be used by pedestrians, and uses within <br />15 2 miles that can reasonably be expected to be used by bicyclists. <br />16 (c) The provisions of the Traffic Impact Analysis Review of EC 9.8650 <br />17 through 9.8680 where applicable. <br />18 The Decision did not adequately evaluate the ability of Oakleigh Lane, from <br />19 the development site to River Road, to meet the standards under subsections <br />20 EC 9.8320(5)(a), (b) and (c). The City also failed to adopt adequate conditions <br />21 of approval to ensure Oakleigh Lane meets the applicable standards prior to <br />22 PUD development. <br />23 It's important to note that EC 9.8320(5) requires that Oakleigh Lane <br />24 meet all applicable standards before the PUD is developed; however, the code <br />25 provisions do not require the developer to do anything beyond what is <br />26 consistent with constitutional requirements in order to meet those requirements. <br />