My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda Item Summary (Dec 9 2013)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
Planning Commission Agenda Item Summary (Dec 9 2013)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:35 PM
Creation date
7/20/2015 11:27:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Planning Commission Meeting
Document_Date
12/9/2013
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />Irrevocable petitions enable the City to initiate a local improvement process and obligate the <br />property owners to pay their proportional share of the street construction costs in the future. <br />The City could construct the street when the majority of benefitting property owners agrees to <br />pay for the improvements. Based on the above findings and condition, the development will <br />comply with the applicable street improvement standards. <br />Opponent Arguments <br />As discussed above, the neighbors raised numerous arguments related to the right-of-way <br />requirements for Oakleigh Lane and asserted that the categories of "access lane" and "low <br />volume residential street" constitute design standards that Oakleigh Lane must be brought up <br />to in order to support the proposed PUD. It is unclear to the Hearings Official whether those <br />arguments are also directed at compliance with EC 9.6505(3 & 4). <br />Hearings Official Conclusions <br />The Hearings Official generally concurs with Staff's findings for EC 9.6505(3 & 4) and adopts <br />those findings by this reference. The Hearings Official also incorporates the findings above for <br />EC 9.8320(5) by this reference. <br />EC 9.6505(3) requires that any streets adjacent to the proposed development be paved by the <br />developer consistent with applicable street width standards. The evidence discussed in the <br />findings for EC 9.8320(5) demonstrates that the applicant will be able to accommodate the <br />necessary right-of-way, street width, and sidewalks if necessary along the portion of Oakleigh <br />Lane adjacent to the subject property. <br />EC 9.6505(5) Bicycle Paths and Accessways. <br />Public right-of-way dedication is being required along the north property line, overlapping an <br />existing worn path between the terminus of Oakleigh Lane and the easterly City parklands, to <br />enable a future bicycle and pedestrian access way. Refer to the previous findings and condition <br />at EC 9.8320(5), which are incorporated by reference. <br />(c) EC 9.6706 Development in Flood Plains through EC 9.6709 Special Flood Hazard <br />Areas - Standards. <br />Staff Findings <br />The subject property is within a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA), per the Federal Emergency <br />Management Agency's (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) 41039C-1128-F, dated June 2, <br />1999. The applicant's topographical survey prepared by Poage Engineering and Surveying, Inc. <br />delineates the SFHA boundaries and notes that the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) is 401.2 feet. <br />Hearings Official Decision (PDT 13-1, WG 13-1) 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.