My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda Item Summary (Dec 9 2013)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
Planning Commission Agenda Item Summary (Dec 9 2013)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:35 PM
Creation date
7/20/2015 11:27:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Planning Commission Meeting
Document_Date
12/9/2013
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Attachment B <br />applicant's plans show no encroachments within this public easement, other than the paths <br />along the north and south property boundaries for bicycles and pedestrians. <br />Public Works staff notes that the applicant's title report identifies the following three <br />easements, which are not shown on the tentative plans: (1) an easement recorded on August 6, <br />1947 at Book 353, Page 146 in favor of the United States for power lines and appurtenances; (2) <br />an easement reserved in a deed recorded March 6, 1942 at Book 229, Page 60 from Nellie <br />McClure, a single person, to H.H. Harris and Gladys M. Harris for a roadway; and (3) an <br />easement recorded October 11, 1949 at Book 403, Page 285 in favor of the United States of <br />America. The applicant's surveyor. has confirmed that all these easements are shown on the <br />survey map and do not impact the applicant's proposed development. <br />In regards to additional public easements, Public Works staff only identify the need for a <br />temporary emergency vehicle access easement; see the prior findings and condition at EC <br />9.8320(5)(a), which are incorporated here by reference. Referral comments from the Eugene <br />Water and Electric Board (EWEB) also indicate the potential need for additional easements, <br />which will be more precisely determined when the service design is approved by EWEB; refer <br />the findings and condition at EC 9.8320(11)(b) and the referenced water standards at EC <br />9.6505(1), which are incorporated by reference. <br />Based on the above findings, the proposed development will comply with EC 9.6500. <br />EC 9.6505 Improvements-Specifications <br />This section requires all public improvements to be designed and constructed.in accordance <br />with adopted plans and policies, the procedures specified in EC Chapter 7, and standards and <br />specifications adopted pursuant to EC Chapter 7. Additionally, all developments are required to <br />be served by and implement infrastructure improvements including water, sewage, streets, <br />street trees, street lights, sidewalks, access ways, and stormwater drainage. <br />EC 9.6505(1) Water Suppiy <br />Staff found, and the Hearings Official agrees, that water service for the proposed development <br />must be provided in accordance with Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB) policies and <br />procedures. Referral comments from EWEB staff are as follows: <br />The existing water infrastructure in Oakleigh Lane and McClure Lane is inadequate to <br />serve any additional development or provide the necessary fire flows along Oakleigh <br />Lane. Therefore, prior to any development of the site, significant upgrades of the water <br />facilities in Oakleigh Lane and McClure Lane along with a loop connection between <br />these streets through the project site will be required to serve the property. Easements <br />will be required across private property to make the loop connection to McClure Lane to <br />the south. The developer will need to fill out EWEB's standard design agreement prior to <br />EWEB proceeding with design of the upgrades. <br />Hearings Official Decision (PDT 13-1, WG 13-1) 36 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.