My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ATT New Evidence Submitted During First Open Record Period
>
OnTrack
>
CU
>
2014
>
CU 14-3
>
ATT New Evidence Submitted During First Open Record Period
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2015 4:11:17 PM
Creation date
6/18/2015 10:30:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CU
File Year
14
File Sequence Number
3
Application Name
ATT AT CROSSFIRE
Document Type
Public Comments submitted after hearings official hearing
Document_Date
6/17/2015
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Download electronic document
View images
View plain text
Based on the incorporated findings, the proposal is found to be consistent with the Metro Plan, <br />and Willakenzie Area Plan (WAP) as required. <br />EC 9.8090(2): The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposal <br />are reasonably compatible with and have minimal impact on the livability or <br />appropriate development of surrounding property, as they relate to the following <br />factors: <br />(a) The proposed building(s) mass and scale are physically suitable for the type <br />and density of use being proposed. <br />This subsection addresses compatibility and livability issues by ensuring that proposed buildings <br />are sized appropriately for their use. In this case the proposed use is for a cell tower not a <br />building as that term is defined in EC 9.0500 and used in subsection (a). <br />(b) The proposed structures, parking lots, outdoor use areas or other site <br />improvements which could cause substantial off-site impacts such as noise, <br />glare and odors are oriented away from nearby residential uses and/or are <br />adequately mitigated through other design techniques, such as screening and <br />increased setbacks. <br />This criterion addresses site improvements that could cause substantial off-site impacts such as <br />noise, glare, and odors: The subject site is surrounded by low-density and medium density <br />residential development to the east, west and north and the golf course to the south. Off-site <br />impacts could come from four apparent sources: noise from the ancillary facilities, glare from <br />lighting, electromagnetic exposure and visual impacts from the ancillary facilities and tower. <br />Noise -The findings and conclusions in response to EC 9.5750(7)(f) are incorporated here by <br />reference. <br />Glare - No tower lighting is proposed. Security, lighting will be required to meet outdoor lighting <br />requirements at EC 9.6725, which require cutoff and shielding as necessary to direct light within <br />the boundary of the development site. Given these standards, glare from the lights will be <br />adequately mitigated. <br />Electromagnetic Radiation (NIER) emissions -Telecommunications standards at EC 9.5750 <br />require the applicant to submit documentation demonstrating compliance with non-ionizing <br />electromagnetic radiation (NIER) emissions standards as set forth by the Federal <br />Communications Commission (FCC). <br />The applicant provided a report as Exhibit O, which includes the documentation demonstrating <br />compliance with non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation (NIER) emission standards as set forth <br />by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). This report was subsequently reviewed by <br />Hearing Official Decision (PDT 10-2, CU 11-1) 45 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.