Therefore, the applicant must resubmit the application with verifiable and accurate propagation <br />maps. Furthermore, <br />signal is belied by the drive test and conversations with agents for the applicant indicating <br />excellent coverage. See exhibit A <br />ed maps showing full coverage). <br />CMS also identified unverifiable or inaccurate statements regarding alternative sites <br />required under 9.5750(6)(c)(2). The applicant has not demonstrated reasons why alternative sites <br />are not technologically unfeasible, and, therefore, the only rationale for rejecting alternative sites <br />facilities cannot be used according to an EWEB policy has been shown to be inaccurate, and, <br />therefore, the application must be denied. <br />The applicant similarly argues that it cannot use existing light poles in the public right of <br />way along Dillard and Fox Hollow roads because the poles are not high enough to provide <br />adequate overall height. This justification, however, begs the question of what coverage is <br />needed. As noted previously, coverage is already excellent in the area, according <br />to agents for the applicant and there is no gap necessary to be covered in the neighborhood. <br />Thus, the agency has not provided verifiable and/or accurate information related to <br />9.5750(6)(c)(2). <br />For 9.5750(6)(c)(3 <br />service coverage area needs, <br />coverage goalsand <br />the search ring are of insufficient height to meet the service needs at +/-By relying on the <br />center, the issue of what is necessary to cover an alleged gap in the area. As noted elsewhere the <br />filled. If the needs, once verified, can be satisfied with less intrusive methods not requiring a 75- <br />ft monopine, then the applicant has not provided sufficient documentation to satisfy (6)(c)(3). <br /> <br />Conditional Use Criteria <br />9.8090(1) The proposal is consistent with applicable provisions of the Metro Plan and <br />applicable refinement plans. <br /> One applicable Metro Plan policy is policy E.4, which provides: <br />facilities shall be designed and located in a manner that preserves and enhances desirable <br />16 <br /> <br />