Attachment A <br />RESPONSE: Please see the Responses to EC 9.8090(5)(a) and (b), above, and Attachment 04 <br />(Site Plan, L1.0-L2.0) for a description of appropriate mitigation, restoration and replacement <br />measures in accordance with EC 6.320. <br />There will be no removal of existing trees, and therefore no restoration or replacement is <br />required. There is no disturbance to slopes, ridgelines and stream corridors as there are none <br />existing on the site. There is also no fish and wildlife habitat, native plant habitat, wetland areas <br />or riparian vegetation to consider. <br />The only existing tree that may be affected by the construction is the 48" spruce (Tree #22). <br />Approximately 7.7 % of the theoretical critical root zone may be affected. The impact to the <br />existing root system would be easily mitigated by constructing tree protection fencing at the <br />construction site. See Attachment 04 (Site Plan, Sheet L1.0) for critical root zone and tree <br />protection fencing. <br />2. For areas included on the city's acknowledged Goal 5 inventory, any loss of <br />natural features shall be consistent with the acknowledged level of <br />preservation provided for the resource. <br />RESPONSE: The proposed project is not on the City's acknowledged Goal 5 Inventory, thus this <br />criterion does not apply. <br />(d) Street Trees. If the proposal includes removal of any street tree(s), removal of <br />those street tree(s) has been approved, or approved with conditions according <br />to the process at EC 6.305 of this code. <br />RESPONSE: The proposed project does not include the removal of any street trees <br />EC 9.8090(6): The proposal provides adequate public facilities and services including, <br />but not limited to utilities, streets, and other infrastructure. <br />The statement assumes that no new services are necessary. The applicant needs to address <br />whether impervious surfaces be added or replaced; and if so, how stormwater runoff will be <br />managed in compliance with applicable standards for stormwater management. <br />RESPONSE:: The proposed project would be unmanned and would not create a need for <br />additional public facilities or services. <br />Water/Sewer: The proposed WCF would be unmanned, so it would not require water, sewer or <br />waste management services. Water requirements for landscaping maintenance would be <br />adequately provided for by an irrigation system. See Att. 04 (Site Plan, Sheet L2.0). <br />Power: The WCF would use 200AI1201240 V, single phase, 3 wire service that would be <br />provided by EWEB. EWEB would need to upgrade its existing pole mounted transformer in order <br />to provide power to AT&T. EWEB would provide and install a new secondary junction box <br />approximately 6 feet from its existing power pole #13322. This location has been reviewed and <br />Completeness Review: New Cingular Wireless - Crossfire Church (CU 14-3) 11 <br />