Written Statement <br /> Chamotee Trails PUD <br /> February 3, 2015 <br /> <br />(9) All proposed dwellings within the PUD are within ¼ mile radius (measured from <br />any point along the perimeter of the development site) of an accessible recreation <br />area or open space that is at least 1 acre in size and will be available to the residents. <br />The Open Space is open to all residents of the PUD. <br /> <br />(10) Lots proposed for development with one-family detached dwellings shall comply <br />with EC 9.2790 Solar Lot Standards (these standards may be modified as set forth <br />in subsection (11) below). <br />The Open Space slopes at greater than 20% towards the north so is exempt from <br />the solar lot criteria per EC 9.2790(4)(a). Lots 1-3 have a north south dimension <br />equal to or greater than 75 feet and a front lot line orientation within 30°of east- <br />west. The alignments of West Amazon Drive and Vivian Drive prevent the <br />remaining lots from having their front lot line orientation within 30° of east- <br />west, qualifying Lots 4-10 for an exception per EC 9.2790(3)(b)2. <br /> <br />(11) The PUD complies with all applicable development standards explicitly addressed <br />in the application except where the applicant has shown that a modification is <br />consistent with the purposes as set out in EC 9.8300 Purpose of Planned Unit <br />Development. <br />Table 9.2750 Residential Zone Development Standards sets forth development <br />standards beyond those discussed above. However because no structures exist <br />on the site, the standards not discussed are not applicable. <br />Except for the driveway shared by Lots 4-10, the PUD does not establish access <br />points to the public right-of-way. The joint-use driveway complies with the <br />access spacing standards criterion of EC 7.420 applicable to local street access <br />connections and nothing in the PUD prevents Lots 1-3 from complying at the time <br />of lot development. <br />Because two flag lots (Lots 5 and 6) are proposed, the criteria at EC 9.2775 are <br />applicable. A portion of these criteria are duplicated in Table 9.2760 and were <br />already discussed under EC 9.8325(7) and a portion are not applicable until the <br />time of lot development; the following are comments regarding the remaining <br />criteria. The pole is a part of the overall lot, therefore the pole and flag areas are <br />under one ownership. Access is via the poles with an access easement that is over <br />and slightly wider than the combined poles. The paving width is 28 feet to allow <br />for fire access and parking on both sides. <br /> <br />Branch Engineering, Inc. <br /> Page 12 of 13 <br />