Application Completeness Review - Laserfiche WebLink

A.0 Han Amendment Cornple`?ene s RRe- ,e%rv Formn Nannln Mvisiorc Application File Name Rest Haven MA 15-1 Date: February 13, 2015 Applicant's Name: Charles Wiper, Inc. Zoning: PL Representative's Name: Carol Schirmer Reviewed by: j Gabe Flock Phone: (541) 682-5697 E-mail: gabriel.flock@ci.eugene.or.us General Comments: Written Statement Required for all Applications Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A 1. Submitted a written statement demonstrating that the requested ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ amendment satisfies the criteria found in EC 9.7735. Described any unchanged portions of the Metro Plan the amendment may affect. 2. Submitted a written statement demonstrating that the requested ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ amendment satisfies the criteria found in EC 9.8424. Described any unchanged portions of the refinement plan the amendment may affect. Comments: See attached cover letter Written Statement Required for a Proposed Text Change Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 3. Submitted a written example of the proposed text change. This should be specific page(s) the change applies to should be cited. Comments In formation Required' for a Proposed Diagram Change Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Submitted a map indicating the property included in the request and adjacent streets and alleys. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. Submitted a vicinity map indicating the general area of the amendment that allows easy identification of the property. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. Submitted a map indicating the existing plan diagram boundaries and the proposed plan diagram boundaries. Comments Required Neighborhood/Applicant Meeting per EC 9.7007 & 9.7010 Submitted Missing Incomplete ® ❑ ❑ 7. Submitted the list of persons who were mailed notice pursuant to EC 9.7007(5) & a signed statement that notice was posted & mailed to those on the list. ® - ❑ ❑ 8. Submitted a copy of the notice(see EC 9.7007(5)) ® ❑ 1-1 9. Submitted a copy of the meeting notes and sign-in sheet described at EC 9.7007(9); ❑ ❑ Z 10. Submitted copy of the site plan presented at the meeting. 11. Verify if site plan submitted with application substantially conforms to site plan ❑ ❑ ® presented at neighborhood/applicant meeting (see EC 9.7007(12)). If not, new meeting is required. Comments: