My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Application Completeness Review
>
OnTrack
>
MA
>
2015
>
MA 15-1
>
Application Completeness Review
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/25/2016 2:58:54 PM
Creation date
2/17/2015 9:48:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
MA
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
REST-HAVEN
Document Type
Application Completeness Review
Document_Date
2/13/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the appHcan t'wiII need to reconcile these discrerj an, cies and provide evidence_ of t he correct a creage <br />calculations used. <br />Zone Charge EC 9~88L51 <br />There appear to be a few areas where the application materials do not address relevant zone change <br />code requirements. One is the code requirement at EC 9.8860(2), regarding the establishment of <br />overlay zones in conjunction with a zone change. Please address this provision as it relates to the <br />possible addition of overlay zoning, or retention of the existing overlay zoning (i.e. /PD, /tJVR, etc.). <br />The application should also more thoroughly address all potentially relevant provisions of the South <br />!-fills Study under EC 9.8865(2), and specifically whether or not there is a basis for application of the <br />/PD overlay on the subject property. <br />Under EC 9.8865(3), the narrative indicates that "All utilities have reviewed the property for service <br />extensions and state they have the capacity for such extensions of service." if so, please provide <br />evidence of this, or otherwise as necessary, to demonstrate compliance with the approval criterion. <br />As presented in the application, the narrative is conclusory without any substantial evidence to <br />support the applicant's claims. <br />Ca Neighborhood/Applicant Meeting EC 9.7007 <br />Based on email correspondence with at least one ofthe neighbors, you acknowledged there was an <br />error with the mailing labels for the required neighborhood/applicant meeting notice, and are <br />planning to hold another meeting with proper notice. As part of a complete application, you will <br />need to provide evidence and should also discuss compliance with the requirements of EC 9.7007 in <br />your written statement. <br />Also enclosed is a document titled, "Incomplete Land Use Application -180 Day Completeness <br />Review Process." To help ensure City staff knows how to proceed with your application, please fill <br />out and return the enclosed form. <br />If you have any questions, please contact me at (541) 682-5697 or via e-mail at: <br />gabriel.flock@ci.eugene.or.us <br />Enclosures: Completeness Review Step <br />Incomplete Land Use Application -180 Day Completeness Review Process <br />Completeness Review Forms <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.