<br />Schirmer Consulting, LLC · PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 · (541) 234-5108 <br />Landscape Architecture + Land Use Planning <br />March 4, 2026 <br /> <br />Matt Denberg <br />Land Use Analysts <br />City of Eugene <br />Planning and Development <br />99 W 10th Avenue <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br /> <br />RE: 15th and High 6-plex <br /> Completeness Review Response (ARA 26-01) <br /> <br /> <br />Matt: <br /> <br />Thank you for your thorough review of the project. The following are the responses to the Completeness Review <br />items. The City items are in regular typeface and my responses are in italics. <br /> <br />PUBLIC WORKS <br /> <br />• Indicate if the intersection is controlled or partially controlled. <br />The response to EC 9.5550(4)(b)(5)a. discusses EC 9.7420(2)(a)2. Influence areas of partially controlled <br />intersections. This was included in the written statement because this is a partially controlled intersection. <br />The statement ‘The intersection of High Street and East 15th Avenue is considered a partially controlled <br />intersection’ has been added to the written statement. <br /> <br />• Indicate how much of each of the parcels is located within the Intersection Influence Area and show this area <br />clearly on the site plan. <br />The development site is located in the Intersection Influence Area. This development is considered as one <br />development site requiring 2 building permits. High Street is classified as a Minor Arterial. The influence area <br />is measured from the centerline of East 15th Avenue and is shown at 100 feet. East 15th Avenue is classified <br />as a Local Street and is not shown on the chart so it is presumed there is no measurement to be shown. This <br />information has been added to the written statement. <br /> <br />• Indicate whether the proposal meets EC 7.420(2)(a). <br />The written statement indicates that this proposed project does not meet EC 7.420(2)(a) as shown under <br />Adjustment Review Request #1 - Reason for Adjustment. The reason for the adjustment section indicated <br />that the development site does not meet this criterion. Hence, the requirement for an Adjustment Review. It <br />also states that the access spacing is not met with respect to the access to the development sites south. <br /> <br />Reason for Adjustment <br />High Street is classified as a minor arterial. The distance from the proposed access to the intersection of <br />East 15th Avenue is 92.5’ This is less than the 100 feet required. <br />The existing access to the south of this proposed access is less than the required 150 feet. <br /> <br />This sentence has been added to the written statement: ‘Therefor this standard needs to be adjusted.’ <br /> <br />• Provide the current spacing distance between leading edge of the existing access on High Street to the <br />adjacent access connection to the south. <br />This spacing was on the original Site Plan submittal. It is shown at 85.5’. Less than the required 150. This <br />was also included in the written statement as a reason for the adjustment. <br /> <br />• Show the location and width of the proposed shared access connection on the plan. <br />This dimension was on the original Site Plan submittal. It is shown as a 20’ wide proposed access. <br /> <br />