Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2.14.2023 Agenda Packetftmw WiPlanning Commission Phone: 541-682-5481 www.eugene-or.gov/pc AGENDA Meeting Location: Hybrid Meeting (See How to Access this Meeting on next page) The Eugene Planning Commission welcomes your interest in these agenda items. This Planning Commission Work Session is in hybrid format without the ability for public comment. Members of the public can watch or listen in using Zoom or phone in options. Information about online or other options for access and participation is available on the last page of this agenda. For the hearing impaired, assistive-listening devices or an interpreter can be provided with 72- hour notice prior to the meeting. Spanish-language interpretation may also be provided with 72- hour notice. These services may not be available during the Planning Commission meeting based on service availability but may occur as a follow up service. To arrange for these services, contact the Planning Division at 541-682-5675. TUESDAY, February 14, 2023 - Regular Meeting 5:30 pm - 7:30 pm Commissioners: Ken Beeson; Diane Behling; Tiffany Edwards; Lisa Fragala (Vice Chair); Dan Isaacson (Chair); Jason Lear, Chris Ramey The Commission will begin the meeting with the City's Land Acknowledgement statement: Since time immemorial the Kalapuya people have been the Indigenous stewards to our region, building dynamic communities, maintaining balance with wildlife, and enacting sustainable land practices. This land acknowledgement is a way of resisting the erasure of Indigenous histories and to honor Native communities by inviting truth and reconciliation. Following treaties between 1851 and 1855, Kalapuya people were dispossessed of their Indigenous homeland by the United States government and forcibly removed to the Coast Reservation in Western Oregon. As we consider the impacts of colonization, we also acknowledge the strength and resiliency of displaced Indigenous people. The City of Eugene is built within the traditional homelands known as Kalapuya Ilihi. Kalapuya descendants are citizens of the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Community of Oregon and the Confederated Tribes of the Siletz Indians of Oregon, they continue to make contributions in our communities here and across the lands. We express our respect for the inherent political sovereignty of all federally recognized Tribal Nations and Indigenous people who live in the State of Oregon and across the nation. Therefore, the Planning Commission recognizes that what we do today will affect the many generations who will come after us. A. WORK SESSION: WILLAMETTE GREENWAY CODE AMENDMENTS (CA 22-1) Work Session to deliberate on proposed land use code amendments that would establish a set of clear and objective standards for the review of housing development within the Willamette River Greenway. Staff: Gabe Flock, 541-682-5697, GFlock eugene-or.gov Staff: Jeff Gepper, 541-682-5282, JGepper(a-_)eugene-or.gov Page 1 of 65 B. ITEMS FROM COMMISSION AND STAFF 1. Other Items from Staff 2. Other Items from Commission 3. Learning: How are we doing HOW TO ACCESS THE MEETING This work session will be in hybrid format without the ability for public comment. Planning Commission and staff will meet in person (or via virtually if needed). Members of the public can watch or listen in using Zoom or phone in options below. To watch a webcast of the meeting live: 1. Visit: httos://www.euaene-or.aov/2109/Plannina-Commission-Webcasts 2. Join on your computer, tablet or smartphone Visit: https://eugene-or-gov.zoom.us/m/88568352100 Sign up to speak by clicking once on the "raise hand" icon 3. Join on your phone Dial one of the below numbers and enter the Webinar ID: 885 6835 2100 +1 833-548-0276 (Toll Free); or +1 833-548-0282 (Toll Free); or +1 877-853-5257 (Toll Free); or +1 888-475-4499 (Toll Free); For higher quality, dial a number based on your current location. International numbers available: https://eugene-or-gov.zoom.us/u/kbEgyMKe59 Page 2 of 65 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY February 14, 2023 To: Eugene Planning Commission From: Gabe Flock, Principal Planner & Project Manager Jeff Gepper, Senior Planner Subject: Deliberations on Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments (City File: CA 22-1) ACTION REQUESTED At this work session, Planning Commission will continue deliberations on the proposed Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments. Staff will present additional materials and topics for further discussion, following the last deliberations meeting held on January 24, 2023. BACKGROUND The purpose of the Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments project is to update Eugene's Willamette River Greenway Permit approval process to provide a set of clear and objective approval criteria for the review of housing development within the Willamette River Greenway. If the proposed amendments are adopted, an applicant seeking to develop housing within the adopted boundary of the Willamette River Greenway will be able to choose to proceed under the new clear and objective standards, or choose to proceed using the City's existing discretionary approval criteria. The proposed code amendments do not change the adopted Willamette River Greenway Boundary, which has been in existence since the mid- 1970's. The proposed clear and objective approval criteria are intended to ensure that housing development within the Willamette River Greenway will continue to be reviewed for consistency with the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal 15 (Willamette River Greenway), and meet the "clear and objective" requirements of ORS 197.307 for housing. As discussed in prior meetings on the topic, overall the proposed changes are intended to meet the City's obligations under State law, reduce barriers to housing development, and maintain a balanced approach to protecting the Willamette River Greenway with effective development standards. In response to public input received as part of the first Planning Commission public hearing on March 8, 2022, as well as Planning Commission deliberations and direction at the June 14, 2022 and August 2, 2022 Planning Commission meetings, staff updated the proposed Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments with several changes to the draft code. The updates generally included the following: • Tree Preservation Standards Added • Public Hearings Required for All Greenway Permits • Greenway Setback Clarifications • Parking Area Limitations Removed Page 3 of 65 • Reduced Length of Building Facades • Native Landscape Buffer Requirements Added • Pedestrian Access Standards Mapping Updated Second Public Hearing The updated draft code and topics noted above were the subject of a second Planning Commission public hearing held on January 10, 2023. At the public hearing, seven people provided spoken testimony. Their comments touched on a variety of issues and concerns such as the relationship between this project and the River Road - Santa Clara neighborhood planning process, ensuring improved Greenway protections through this code amendment process, protecting public access and existing park land, and requirements for native plantings near the river. Following the close of the public hearing, the Planning Commission voted to hold the Planning Commission record open for additional written testimony through S:OOpm on January 20, 2023. Deliberations At the last deliberations meeting held on January 24, 2023, the Planning Commission's discussion was focused on several key topic areas, which were also addressed in more detail as part of the previous agenda packet materials: • Things the Proposed Code Amendments Will Not Do • Relationship to River Road-Santa Clara (RRSC) Neighborhood Plan • Statewide Planning Goal 5 and Goal 15 Relationship • Other Related Development Standards (Stormwater, Building Height, etc.) • Further Review of Proposed Tree Preservation Standards • Native Landscape Buffer Requirements • Pedestrian Access Standards & Mapping Updates Several requests for additional information and further analysis arose as part of the discussion, which are addressed by topic areas in a staff memo included as Attachment A. These topic areas and related materials will be the focus of this deliberations meeting, leading toward a possible recommendation on the proposed code amendments. The topic areas addressed in the memo and related attachments include the following: • Willamette River Greenway Permits - 15 Year History • Landscape Buffer Dimension & Native Species • Undeveloped and Partially Developed Properties Near the Riverfront Path System • Public Access Points - Mapping and Related Standards • Site Examples Staff is also preparing draft findings to demonstrate compliance with the approval criteria for the proposed code amendments, to be presented for review at a subsequent meeting (tentatively scheduled on March 14, 2023) pending any further direction on whether additional draft code revisions may be necessary before reaching a recommendation. The goal of this deliberations meeting will be to identify any potential draft code revisions that may needed for additional review, and to be addressed in the draft findings. Page 4 of 65 PROCEDURAL SUMMARY As noted in prior materials for this project, the proposed land use code amendments are subject to Type V application (legislative) procedures (EC 9.7500 through EC 9.7560), as well as the approval criteria in EC 9.8065. Notice of both prior public hearings on the proposed Willamette Greenway Code amendments was provided consistent with the notice requirements for Type V (legislative) land use applications. All written testimony received through the date of the second public hearing and open record period ending on January 20, 2023 has been provided to the Planning Commission for consideration. All testimony submitted to the Planning Commission, including any testimony submitted after the end of the Planning Commission's open record period, will also be forwarded to the City Council for consideration as part of their subsequent public hearing process. As a courtesy, written testimony received by the City, along with a variety of additional materials including the online Greenway Setback map, prior meeting materials and recordings, and the updated draft code can also be found on the City's project website at: https://www.eugene-or.gov/764/Land-Use-Code-Amendments. NEXT STEPS The next deliberations meeting on the Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments is tentatively scheduled for March 14, 2023, at which the Commission may reach a recommendation on the proposed land use code amendments. Following Planning Commission's recommendation, City Council will hold a public hearing and work sessions as needed before taking final action on the proposed amendments later this year. ATTACHMENTS A. Staff Memo - Additional Information and Materials for Deliberations A.1 Willamette River Greenway Permits - 15 Year History A.2 Memorandum from Cameron McCarthy Landscape Architects and Planners A.3 Supplemental Maps A.4 Public Access Points - Updated Maps and Methodology B. City of Eugene Adopted Native Plants List (Annotated) C. Updated Draft Code (Revised Version 2, dated January 20, 2023) FOR MORE INFORMATION More information regarding the Willamette River Greenway Code Amendment project can be found here: https://www.eugene-or.gov/764/Land-Use-Code-Amendments, or by contacting staff directly: Gabe Flock, Principal Planner & Project Manager Telephone: (541) 682-5697 Staff E-Mail: gflock@eugene-or.gov Jeff Gepper, Senior Planner Telephone: (541) 682-5282 Staff E-Mail: Tepper@eu~ene-or.ov Page 5 of 65 Attachment A AAM4,MEMORANDUM To: Eugene Planning Commission From: Jeff Gepper, Senior Planner Subject: Additional Information and Materials for Deliberations Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments (City File: CA 22-1) This memorandum provides additional information in response to public testimony and requests from Commissioners at the January 10, 2023 public hearing and subsequent January 24, 2023 deliberations for the proposed Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments. The specific topic areas include the following: 1. Willamette River Greenway Permits - 15 Year History 2. Landscape Buffer Dimension & Native Species 3. Undeveloped and Partially Developed Properties Near the Riverfront Path System 4. Public Access Points - Mapping and Related Standards 5. Site Examples Any references to the Draft Willamette River Greenway Amendments are specifically referring to Revised Version 2, which was published on January 20, 2023. As mentioned in the AIS, prior to the Commission's next deliberation meeting (currently tentatively scheduled for March 14), staff plans to present the Planning Commission with a set of findings demonstrating consistency with the code amendment approval criteria at Eugene Code (EC) 9.8065. Attachments: A.1 Willamette Greenway Permits - 15 Year History A.2 Memorandum from Cameron McCarthy Landscape Architects and Planners A.3 Supplemental Maps A.4 Public Access Points - Updated Maps and Methodology Page 1 of 13 Page 6 of 65 Attachment A Topic 1: Willamette River Greenway Permits -15 Year History A report summarizing the status of all Willamette River Greenway Permit applications received in the last 15 years (2008-present) is provided in Attachment A. Here are some key takeaways from the report: • Since 2008, 37 applications were submitted, of which 34 were approved, 2 withdrawn, and 1 is currently under review • Of the 34 approved applications, the development included in 19 of the applications have been fully completed, and the remaining 15 are either under construction or have not begun construction. • Of the 37 applications, 21 were applied for by a public entity, such as the City of Eugene, Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB), or the University of Oregon. • Of the 37 applications, 16 include housing as part of the application. • Of the 16 applications that included housing for private development, 6 proposals were within 300 feet of the proposed Top of Bank (i.e. included property in the proposed Greenway Setback Area or Tree Preservation Zones 1 & 2). The report provided in Attachment A.1 also includes a link to relevant application materials and decisions for each application for anyone interested in reviewing specific applications, related site plans and other documentation. Topic 2: Landscape Buffer Dimension & Native Species At the January 24, 2023 Planning Commission deliberations, Commissioner Ramey requested more information and analysis regarding the proposed landscape buffer' that will be required along the landward side of the Greenway Setback line. As proposed, the draft amendments would require a 10-foot deep landscape buffer comprised of low screen landscaping ("L-2"), which includes a continuous 30-inch high screen of low shrubs, one canopy tree for every 30 linear feet, and living plant material covering 70% of the required landscape area. Only native plants may be planted in the landscape area. Specifically, there was interest on the part of the Commission regarding other, existing code provisions for a 10-foot deep landscape bed and whether that depth provides adequate room for the required landscaping. The City's consultants at Cameron McCarthy Landscape Architecture and Planning submitted a memorandum on February 9, 2023 that analyzes the 10-foot minimum depth standard for landscape beds and whether it is the appropriate depth given other existing landscape standards throughout Eugene's land use code (see "Cameron McCarthy Memo" in Attachment A.2). The Cameron McCarthy Memo concludes that proposed 10-foot landscape buffer width setback is sufficient to accommodate the largest permitted canopy trees and low shrubs required to meet the L-2 Low Screen Landscape Standard. 1 The landscape buffer is required under EC 9.8812(3)(a) in the Draft Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments. Page 2 of 13 Page 7 of 65 Attachment A As outlined in the Cameron McCarthy Memo, there are existing code provisions for a 10-foot landscape bed for L-2 Landscaping; however, the more common standard for L-2 landscaping is a 7-foot deep landscape bed. This standard is most often implemented along parking areas for commercial and multi-unit developments. While the memo concludes that the 10-foot bed provides adequate space for L-2 landscaping, staff also notes that there are examples throughout Eugene demonstrating that the required 7-foot deep landscaping bed provides adequate space for the required shrubs, canopy trees, and ground cover to be successful in providing screening. Based on this new analysis and information, staff recommends the landscape buffer either remain at the proposed 10-foot minimum depth, as proposed code section EC 9.8812(3)(a), or be reduced from 10 feet to 7 feet. In addition to their analysis of the landscape buffer dimensions, the Cameron McCarthy Memo also analyzes the native species list for required tree and other plantings within the Greenway Setback Area and the landscape buffer2. They conclude that "the list is comprehensive and provides a sufficient range of species and options to respond to site conditions, conformance with the L-2 standards, and commercial availability." They also note that "updating the list periodically to respond to climate change and new species information is recommended but not necessary at this time." Based on this supporting analysis and review, staff continues to support the use of the Native Plants and Species list included in Exhibit F to Ordinance 20351, as proposed in the draft amendments. Topic 3: Undeveloped and Partially Developed Properties Near the Riverfront Path System At the January 24, 2023, Planning Commission deliberations, Commissioner Isaacson requested more information about properties within the Willamette River Greenway that have development potential and are located near the riverfront path network. To identify these properties, staff used a set of Supplemental Maps published in the summer of 2022 (see Attachment A.3) that provides property specific information for the zoning, development status, and other factors for lands within the Willamette River Greenway. While a significant part of the Greenway is either developed or publicly owned, two areas have been identified that contain multiple properties that are undeveloped or partially developed and near the riverfront path running along the banks of the Willamette River. A brief description and maps of those two areas are provided below. Area 1: This area is primarily located in the River Road Neighborhood, with one other undeveloped parcel located on the east side of the river in the Willakenzie area. Two of the properties shown as undeveloped or partially developed have received Willamette River Greenway Permit approval for housing developments, see notes in the map below for more information. The property on the east side of the river is zoned C-2 Community Commercial (see location #1), which would permit a variety of higher density housing or commercial 2 Required native species plantings are required under the proposed tree preservation requirements at EC 9.6885(2)(d)2. and EC 9.8030(13)(b)8. in the Draft Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments. These provisions require native species selected from Exhibit F to Ordinance 20351 for any trees planted within the Greenway Setback Area. Additionally, the landscape buffer must also be planted with native species from this same list, as required at EC 9.8812(3)(d). Page 3 of 13 Page 8 of 65 Attachment A development. The remaining parcels that extend from River Road to the riverfront path system (see location #2), are designated for Medium Density Residential and therefore intended for future housing development. Page 4 of 13 Page 9 of 65 Attachment A Area 2: This area is also located in the River Road Neighborhood. Two of the properties shown as undeveloped or partially developed have received Willamette River Greenway Permit approval for housing developments, see notes in the map below for more information. The remaining parcels are designated and zoned for Low-Density Residential and therefore intended for future housing development. Page 5 of 13 Page 10 of 65 Attachment A While these two areas are some of the few major development opportunities for undeveloped and partially developed properties, many other properties throughout the Willamette River Greenway that are categorized as "developed" may be suitable for infill or redevelopment. Therefore, applying standards consistently throughout the Willamette River Greenway is important as properties continue to develop and redevelop incrementally over time. Topic 4: Public Access Points - Mapping and Related Standards As part of the proposed clear and objective approval criteria, EC 9.8812(4)(a)2. would require multi-unit housing' developments to provide a public accessway connecting to other existing public ways along the Willamette River, so long as the City can demonstrate consistency with constitutional requirements, if the property is located more than 500 feet from a mapped Public Access Point. At the January 10, 2023 public hearing, staff provided the Planning Commission with a map showing mapped Public Access Points and identifying which properties were more than 500 feet from those public access points. The map was intended to demonstrate which properties would likely be subject to the access requirement. Following the public hearing, Commissioner Behling noted that the map did not appear to accurately capture properties within 500 feet of a public access point in all cases. In response this comment, staff revisited the methodology used to create the Public Access Points4. During this review, it came to light that the original methodology used to establish the location of public access points overlooked a number of public access points and primarily included locations where a right-of-way or accessway intersected the boundary of the Willamette River Greenway. Since the public hearing, staff has worked to create a new set of mapped Public Access Points, which can be seen in the maps provided in Attachment A.4. These points were established using the refined methodology described and included in Attachment A.4, which was thoroughly reviewed to ensure accurate and consistent methods for identifying Public Access Points. An updated map of properties located more than 500 feet from a mapped Public Access Point is included in Attachment A.4. One major takeaway of this exercise is that over the years the City has established excellent public access to the riverfront path network to and along the Willamette River throughout the Greenway. This is evidenced by the very few properties that are identified as being more than 500 feet from a mapped Public Access Point. Based on the new mapping, staff recommends that a map similar to the one shown in Attachment A.4, identifying specific tax lots that are more than 500 feet from an established public access point, be added as an exhibit to the final ordinance. This would allow users to look at the map, find their property, and it would be clearly identified as either within or not within s Multi-Unit Housing is defined as one or more buildings on a single lot or parcel containing 5 or more dwellings in any configuration (See EC 9.0500). As the access requirement applies to Multi-Unit Housing only, the proposed access requirement at EC 9.8812(4) would not be applicable to single-unit dwellings or middle housing. 4 Public Access Points were originally defined in the methodology as a point "where right-of-way intersects with multi-use path connections." Page 6 of 13 Page 11 of 65 Attachment A 500 feet of an access point. A draft of this proposed revision to the draft code change is shown in the figure below. EC 9.8812(4) Access. The following standards apply to any proposed housing that will result in 5 or more dwelling units on one development site: Where the development site abuts publicly owned land, on-site pedestrian paths shall be provided from the property line nearest to the Willamette River to main building entrances. Where required, these on-site pedestrian paths shall be a minimum of 3 feet wide, and be constructed of concrete, asphalt, or any pervious surface that complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act, unless adjusted in accordance with EC 9.8030(22). Where the development site is Ineated identified as bei i~ more than 500 feet from a public access point -h^„ o,;,^ anin Exhibit X to Ordinance No. XXXXX, cnd provided the City can mare findings to demonstrate consistency with constitutional requirements. the Cityflnray-Lvill require the dedication and improvement of a public accessway, csi5tent with the stem's at EG 9.6995 extending from the property line of the development site to existing public ways that provide a connection to or along the Willamette River. The public accessway shall be a minimum 10 feet in width, constructed in accordance with public improvement standards. FeF purpese5 of this subsectien ,;thin 500 We G.rd-in-ance No. XXXXX. If these changes are supported by the Planning Commission, they will be incorporated into the next version of the Draft Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments. Page 7 of 13 Page 12 of 65 Topic 5: Site Examples At the January 24, 2023 Planning Commission deliberations, staff presented five site examples intended to illustrate how properties would be impacted by the proposed Greenway Setback and Tree Preservation Zones if they choose to develop under the clear and objective approval criteria. The selected properties show a variety of different property scenarios, such as a vacant, commercially zoned property, properties that are only partially within the Greenway, and developed property close to the Willamette River. The five site example locations can be seen in the map to the right. ~ r t y r- µ 1.Y• fey y. Y~ k . y{r ~ `4 Y y~ lx~ J' d~r1(%k -~i."i is Attachment A ~9 ~ a kh .k. Y'.r k ~ ~r S r Page 8 of 13 Page 13 of 65 Site 1 Neighborhood: River Road Zoning: R-1 Low Density Residential Development Status: Partially Developed Land Use Designation: Medium Density Residential Auacnme Area Square Feet Site Size (Total) 80,150 nt H % of Site 100% Greenway Setback 12,100 15% Tree Preservation Zone 1 15,300 19% Tree Preservation Zone 2 15,300 19% Tree Preservation Zone 3 37,450 47% Outside of Greenway - 0% Page 9 of 13 Page 14 of 65 Attachment A Site 2 Neighborhood: Willakenzie Area Zoning: C-2 Community Commercial Development Status: Undeveloped Land Use Designation: Major Retail Center Willamette River Greenway Permit: This site received approval for the development of a 101-room hotel, but has not been developed yet. (See WG 16-1) Site Size (Total) 95,396 7 0 Greenway Setback 2,180 Tree Preservation Zone 1 13,100 1 4% Tree Preservation Zone 2 5,720 6% Tree Preservation Zone 3 - 0% J Outside of Greenway 74,396 78% Page 15 of 65 Greenway Setback IVV t Subject Site Greenway Boundary Site 3 Neighborhood: River Road Zoning: R-1 Low-Density Residential Development Status: Developed Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential Site Size (Total) MMM~ Htiacnm Square Feet 18,556 ent H % of Site 100% Greenway Setback 1,980 11% Tree Preservation Zone 1 8,520 46% Tree Preservation Zone 2 7,880 42% Tree Preservation Zone 3 176 1% Outside of Greenway - 0% i 4 Subject ~o~flllC° Site 1 0 o -jog G ree nway ~Fd ~ oDW@ ~ . r . Boundary Greenway Setback Page 11 of 13 Page 16 of 65 Site 4 Neighborhood: River Road Zoning: R-1 Low-Density Residential Development Status: Undeveloped Land Use Designation: Low Density Residential Willamette River Greenway Permit: This site received approval for the development of low-density residential. (See WG 19-7) Attachme Area Square Feet Site Size (Total) 8,710 nt A 100% Greenway Setback - 0% Tree Preservation Zone 1 - 0% Tree Preservation Zone 2 - 0% Tree Preservation Zone 3 8,710 100% Outside of Greenway - 0% _ j R LN R . y 7 + 1_7 I Subject Site - ' . - ' ± L Vi it 5 , Greenway - ..r►~ i ;Boundary Greenway Setback V„ a~T Page 17 of 65 Site 5 Neighborhood: Walnut Station Zoning: Walnut Station Special Area Zone Development Status: Developed Land Use Designation: Commercial / Mixed Use Site Size (Total) 20,037 100% Greenway Setback - 0% Tree Preservation Zone 1 2,180 11% Tree Preservation Zone 2 5,406 27% Tree Preservation Zone 3 535 3% Outside of Greenway 11,916 59% Page 18 of 65 Attachment A Attachment A.1 Willamette River Greenway Permits - 15 Year History Below is a list of all Willamette River Greenway Permit Applications from 2008 to 2023. To learn more about each proposal, please click the link for the specific application in column 1: "App # & Link". WG 08-1 Approved Complete Yes Construct single family dwelling 127 Arbor Drive R-1/WR PK Park (2727 Leo WG 08-2 Approved Complete No Baseball Park & Facilities (PK Park) Harris Parkway) PL/WR PK Park (2727 Leo WG 08-3 Approved Complete No Baseball Park & Facilities (PK Park) Harris Parkway) PL/WR 1-5 Bridge Construction over WG 08-4 Approved Complete No Willamette River 1-5 Bridge PL & PL/WR 1-5 Bridge Phase 11: Alton Baker. Construct 1-5 Bridges, bike/ped PL & PL/WR & WG 09-1 Approved Complete No paths, and associated work. 1-5 Bridge ROW/WR Construction of parking lot, and associated site improvements to WG 10-1 Approved Complete No serve the U of 0 campus 1625 Millrace Drive C-2/WR Division to River WG 10-2 Approved Complete No West Bank Path Extension Avenue PL/WR Intersection at Transportation infrastructure for Goodpasture and WG 10-3 Approved Complete No associated PUD Alexander Loop PL/WR 2727 Leo Harris WG 10-4 Approved Complete No U of 0 Soccer/Lacrosse Complex Parkway PL/WR U of o Casanova Center extension 2727 Leo Harris WG 10-5 Approved Complete No and parking Parkway PL/WR EWEB: Add 36" water line to the WG 11-1 Approved Complete No existing beltline bridge Beltline Bridge ROW Open space, multi-use path East portion of WG 11-2 Withdrawn N/A No through Alton Baker Park Alton Baker Park PL/WR & C-1 Page 19 of 65 Page 1 of 4 Attachment A.1 • Construct a shared-use path to Between Merry connect to the City's existing West Lane and West R-1/PL/WR/WG WG 12-1 Approved Complete No Bank Path to Merry Lane. Bank Path & PL/WR/WG Public open space (Rasor Park); paved-shared use path (Rasor Park WG 12-2 Approved Complete No Connector) Rasor Park PL/ND/WR Replace EWEB water main across the Willamette River. New pipe attached to existing Beltline Bridge. Old pipe under the riverbed to be PL/WR & WG 12-3 Approved Complete No abandoned. Beltline Bridge AG/WR EWEB Downtown Riverfront. Concurrent Code Amendments, Metro Plan and Refinement Plan Replaced with amendments, Zone Change, and POS/ND & MU New Willamette Greenway Permit for & HDR, MU/ND Application (see implementation of the EWEB Downtown & HI/ND & WG 12-4 Approved WG 19-3) Yes Riverfront Master Plan. Riverfront POS/ND Residential Cohousing development with 29 dwelling Under units (Oakleigh Meadow Planned Southeast terminus WG 13-1 Approved Construction Yes Unit Development) of Oakleigh Lane R-1 Eugene Townplace Suites, a 101- Property East of WG 16-1 Approved Not Developed No room hotel Valley River Inn C-2/WR/SR Market District Townhomes. 20 Under Townhouses on South side of 135 Shelton WG 16-2 Approved Construction Yes Skinner Butte. McMurphy Blvd S-W/SR 100-unit multi-family apartment building with 5-stories over 1 story WG 17-1 Approved Complete Yes parking garage 35 Club Road C-2/SR Lombard Apartments: 94 market R-2/ND & R- WG 17-2 Withdrawn n/a Yes rate multi-family dwelling units n/a 2/ND/SR Page 20 of 65 Page 2 of 4 Attachment A.1 • U of 0 Knight Campus: New science building and associated C-2 & S-RP & S- WG 18-1 Approved Complete No improvements 1505 Franklin Blvd WS & /WR U of 0 North Campus Conditional U of 0 campus Use Permit: Development of between Partial university buildings, restoration, Willamette River S-RP/WR & S- WG 18-2 Approved Completion No and associated uses. and Franklin Blvd RP & S-WS/WR Lombard Apartments: 94 market 393 Lombard WG 18-3 Approved Complete Yes rate multi-family dwelling units Street R-2/ND & SR Campbell Senior Center: Expansion WG 19-1 Approved Complete Yes and renovation 155 High Street PL/WR 4.1 Education Center: New modular WG 19-2 Approved Complete No building 200 North Monroe PL/WR Eugene Downtown Riverfront Project: Approval of a City-initiated package of related land use applications necessary to implement an updated concept plan for redevelopment of the Downtown Riverfront. Includes S-DR/WR & Code Amendments, Refinement PL/WR & 1- Under Plan Amendments, Zone Changes, Downtown 2/WR & S-W/SR WG 19-3 Approved Construction Yes Willamette Greenway Permit Riverfront & S-DR Not Bird Haven Subdivision: Create 12 End of Greenleaf WG 19-4 Approved Constructed Yes residential lots & private street Avenue R-1/WR Under Alton Baker Multi-Family: New 177 Day Island WG 19-5 Approved Construction Yes 100-unit multi-family building Road C-2/WR/PD Garden Avenue Apartments Parking Lot: Construction of a new 59 space parking lot, landscaping, utilities and access drive to serve the new Garden Avenue apartment Under complex. The apartment building WG 19-6 Approved Construction No is outside of the Willamette River 1841 Garden Way S-WS/WR Page 21 of 65 Page 3 of 4 Attachment A.1 • Greenway, and is not subject to this application. Not Request for R-1 residential South Side of WG 19-7 Approved Constructed Yes development Thomason Lane R-1 West side of N. Delta Ridge Cottages: PUD for a Delta Highway at Under mixture of Multi-family and other intersection with WG 20-1 Approved Construction Yes residential uses (626 Units Total) Umpqua Avenue R-1 Between 615 River Not River Road Apartments: 48-unit Road and the WG 21-1 Approved Constructed Yes apartment building Willamette River C-2/ND/SR/WR Not WG 21-2 Approved Constructed Yes Single family dwelling Oakleigh Lane R-1/UL U of 0 Indoor Football Facility construct a new Indoor Football Not Practice Facility within the Autzen Autzen Stadium WG 21-3 Approved Constructed No Stadium Complex PL/WR U of 0 Knight Campus Phase II: Request to construct a new 175,000 square foot Across the Mill bioengineering and applied Race (north) of scientific research and training Knight Campus Not building as Phase 2 of the Knight building at 1505 WG 22-1 Approved Constructed No Campus. Franklin Street C-2 /WR Not Request to construct a single- V Under Review Constructed Yes family dwelling Loretta Way R-1 Page 22 of 65 Page 4 of 4 Attachment A.2 CAMERON McCARTHY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE & PLANNING MEMORANDUM Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments (CA 22-1) To: Gabe Flock, Principal Planner From: Colin McArthur, AICP Lauren Ransome, ASLA Zak Johnson, ASLA Date: February 9, 2023 Subject: Native Landscape Buffer The proposed Willamette River Greenway Permit approval criteria include a new standard (EC 9.8810(3)(a)) that would require a 10-foot native landscape buffer for development proposals reviewed under the new clear and objective track. The buffer is required along the length of the Willamette River Greenway Setback. During Planning Commission deliberations on January 24, 2023, Commissioners inquired about the width of setback, basis for the 10-foot width, and whether the width was sufficient for plantings to reach mature health over time especially given the requirement for exclusively native plantings. Commissioners also discussed the native plant list included in the code, the City's adopted list of plant species for sites at or below 500 feet in elevation (Exhibit F to Ordinance No. 20351), and whether the list was suitable for application in the Willamette River Greenway. This memorandum address and expands upon both topics. LANDSCAPE AREA As proposed, EC 9.8812(3)(a) would require that a "landscape area that meets the requirements of EC 9.6210 Low Screen Landscape Standard (L-2) shall be provided along the length of the Willamette River Greenway setback" at a "minimum depth of 10 feet". The proposed width is consistent with other setback and buffer standards in EC, in addition to having a basis in best practices for plant establishment. Following are a few of the other setback standards in EC: • All Residential zones and the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial zone have a 10-foot minimum front yard building setback. • The Public Land zone includes 10-foot minimum front yard and interior yard setback. • The E-1, E-2, 1-2, and 1-3 zones require "landscaping that is at least 10 feet in width" for interior yard setbacks abutting residential zones. The proposed 10-foot landscape area width is consistent with best practices for healthy plant growth and mature sizing of canopy trees and low shrubs, as required by the L-2 Low Screen Landscape Standard. Recommended planting area widths and spacing can vary widely by species, however established recommendations in other documents in use provide guidance on minimum width recommendations. The City of Eugene's Approved Street Tree List includes an 8-9 foot planting area minimum requirement for many of the approved tree species included in Exhibit F to Ordinance No. 20531.1 Other regional jurisdictions follow similar width recommendations to accommodate mature tree growth, including the City of Portland, Eugene I Portland I Bend cameronmccarthy.com Page 23 of 65 Attachment A.2 Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments (CA 22-1) City of Eugene Native Landscape Buffer February 9, 2023 whose Tree Density Standards require 10x10 foot minimum planting area for large canopy trees.' The City of Portland's Tree and Landscaping Manual also recommends an 8-foot minimum planter width for several large canopy tree species that also appear in Exhibit F.3 Recommended spacing for shrubs also varies by species but generally falls in the range of estimated mature height. The L-2 Low Screen Landscape Standard requires "[l]ow shrubs to form a continuous screen at least 30 inches high within 3 years and maintained at a height not to exceed 42 inches." Shrubs that fall within the range of 2-4 feet tall will often require approximately 2-4 feet of space to accommodate growth. To achieve a denser screen, low hedge plants can be planted approximately 18 inches apart.4 Based on these findings, the proposed 10-foot landscape buffer width is sufficient to accommodate the largest permitted canopy trees and low shrubs required to meet the L-2 Low Screen Landscape Standard. NATIVE PLANT LIST The proposed approval criteria require the landscape area to "be planted exclusively with native plants included on the City's adopted list of plant species for sites at or below 500 feet in elevation, attached as Exhibit F to Ordinance No. 20351." Approved species on the list have been selected for suitability in riparian conditions in close proximity to the Willamette River. The list includes 16 tree species, 29 shrub species, and other vine, herbaceous, grasses, sedges, and rushes species. The list includes a key to site suitability and applies to each species, that notes whether the species is suitable for shallow water, water's edge, lower bank, and/or upper bank site conditions. Upper bank (UB) is defined as terraces above the ordinary high-water line. The proposed 10-foot native landscape buffer would apply in both lower and upper bank conditions given the variability of topography along the river's edge within proposed Willamette River Greenway Setback. Landscape Architects, including a certified Arborist, from Cameron McCarthy reviewed the plant list for consistency with native plant communities commonly found along the riparian corridor of the Willamette River and variety, in application responding to different site conditions, and availability. The list is comprehensive and provides a sufficient range of species and options to respond to site conditions, conformance with the L-2 standards, and commercial availability. Updating the list periodically to respond to climate change and new species information is recommended but not necessary at this time. REFERENCES 1 City of Eugene Parks and Open Space (2020). Approved Street Tree List and Planting Guide. 2 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services (2019). Tree Code Information Guide. a City of Portland Bureau of Development Services (2017). Tree and Landscaping Manual. ° Washington State University Master Gardener Program (2015). Spacing of Landscape Plants. CAt~EgeON MCARTHY Page 2 24 0 Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments (CA 22-1) Other Lands' within Willamette Greenway Boundary For analysis purposes, the term'b,her lands" N UGB Committed Lands includes land wlthdevelopmencorredevelopment potential and excludes comm ed landp5,00 ,00 000 ,p Committed lands are defined Qty, C i , WRG 6 g~5 other Lands and Federal property, parks a Feet school district property, ceme P"I"I,Illry 11 property, and, transportation rights-of-way. Miles Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments (CA 22-1) Map 1. Zoning of Other Lands' within Willamette Greenway Boundary Q UGB 4 AG 213 R-1 1 R-4 1 For analysis purposes, the term "other lands" includes land with development or redevelopment IP WRG Boundary 5 C-1 126 R-2 30 SAZ potential and excludes comm ec and Committed lands are defined c ,c p ~tA~, 3,000 6,000 Of 65 WRG Torfnggl a 63 C-2 3 R-3 8 PL and Federal property, parks a Feet 1 WRG Proposed Setback 453 Lots Total drool district property; ceme property, and, transportation righs-of-way. Miles Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments (CA 22-1) Map 2. Development Status of Other Lands' UGB Undeveloped / Vacant 1 For analysis purposes, the term "other lands" l includes land with development or redevelopment WRG Boundary Partially Vacant potential and excludes comm ed land Committed lands are deflneda Qty, Cp~tA~, 3,000 6,000 WRG Torp6iqljai~cOf 65 Protected and Federal property, parks a Feet school district property; cern I-Y Miles Q WRG Proposed Setback Developed property, and, transportation rights-of-way. Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments (CA 22-1) Map 3. Residential Zoning of Other Lands' l Q UGB 213 R-1 343 Total Lots 1 For analysis purposes, the term "other lands" Al 103.47 total Acres includes land with development or redevelopment WRG Boundary 126 R 2 potential and excludes comm ed land Committed lands are defined Gty, Cpfl,~tA~, 3,00 6,00 WRG Torp6iqlja Of 65 3 R-3 and Federal property, parks a Feet school district property; ceme Q WRG Proposed Setback 1 R-4 property, and, transportation rights-of-way. Miles Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments (CA 22-1) Map 4. Lots Affected by Proposed Setback of Other Lands QUGB Affected Land 1 For analysis purposes, the term "other lands' 67 Lots includes land with development or redevelopment WRG Boundary potential and excludes com1rr~jed Ian 14.49 Acres Committed lands are defined~s Ci Y, Ci,~D~e,3,000 6,000 WRG To Wll65 and Federal property; parks a school district property cem Feet Q WRG Proposed Setback property; and, transportation rights-0f--way Miles gyres Rd i y aaA / \ Oe c~ S v 3 • • ~I Attachmelot AA G1 -Wthne S v • 3 Q Willakenzie Rd • • • Cal Young Rd G • ,rt m v .L • ° 0 of v Harlow Rd s~F "qllevRiver (D Q IprPSS er 9 ~dy • sevelt Blvd • • • • 105 • W 1st Ave W 2nd Ave • _ • • W 6th Ave • W 7th Ave • • I ~ v W 11th Ave T) LEE E 11th Ave - S 0 rt L W 13th Ave - N E 13th Ave Frankl n B~Vd • Lane County/ LA University of • n o ~ s ~ Oregon v 2 D 3 ea N v L < v 0.5 (D 3 I ~ (D Miles (D • Public Access Points Caution: This map is not suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. This map in no way attempts to predict, determine, or 0 Willamette Greenway require what happens on individual lots. O Eugene Urban Growth Data sources: City of Eugene, Lane County, RLID, DOGAMI. BP Yf 65 Map Created January 2023 by City of Eugene Planning Division 111, -vres Rd 4Tn ov o 00 • r • • • mds Park • • • • cQ -a PS1~ • ley River C • .1WI 0 • • ~sevelt Blvd A~ • • • • 105 0- W 2nd Ave f Fi .v Cal Young Rd Crescent Ave Willakenzie Rd t 71o~ S*rtin Luther King J ,en • ium • • is Skinner Butte W 1st Ave • • • W 6th Ave • • ,I N W 7th Ave Taxlots that are subject to access standards are located more than 500 ft. walking distance from a public access point. v s o 3 Ln 0.5 0 f Ca' E 11th Ave • W D X, E 13th Ave Q v, v N University of Oregon 0 _ 1 L~ ~ I N AttachmerNt AA I Miles • Public Access Points Q Willamette Greenway Caution: This map is not suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying Taxlots Subject to Eugene Urban Growth purposes. This map in no way attempts to predict, determine, or Access Standards Boundary require what happens on individual lots. Taxlots Exempt from Data sources: City of Eugene, Lane County, RLID, DOGAMI. Access S~Qkqf 65 Map Created January 2023 by City of Eugene Planning Division A • Attachment A.4 Summary of Methodology Utilized to Determine Willamette River Greenway Public Access Points and Taxlots Subject to Public Accessway Standards Purpose To identify and clarify in GIS (Geographic Information Systems) public access points and taxlots within the adopted Willamette Greenway boundary Greenway that are farther than 500 ft walking distance to a public access point. Background The proposed Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments include access requirements at EC 9.8812(4) that apply to housing developments that proposes five or more dwelling units on one development site. The standards require on-site pedestrian paths connecting main building entrances to the property line nearest to the Willamette River Greenway, to promote access to the river within the development site. In addition, when the development site is not within 500 feet of a defined public access point, the requirements give the City the option to require the dedication and improvement of a public accessway that is 10 feet wide and constructed in accordance with public improvement standards. If enacted and consistency with constitutional requirements can be demonstrated, the required connection must extend from the property line through or along the development site to existing public ways that provide a connection to or along the Willamette River. The following methodology details the determination of public access points and the following service area analysis which determines taxlots not within 500 feet of a defined public access point. Methodology Access Points Public access points are defined and shown as mapped points where public right-of-way and multi-use paths intersect with existing multi-use path connections inside the Willamette Greenway overlay that lead to the Willamette River. The following methodology builds off of work done by Cameron McCarthy who developed the initial public access points layer. 1. 'Select by Location' to select park polygons that intersect Willamette Greenway polygon. Export selection to new layer. 2. Use 'Intersect' tool to create points where the lines/roads from the Eugene_Ped_Network (from Lane Council of Governments or LCOG) intersect parks within the greenway. 3. Manual revisions made to explode multipart points and remove false access points (i.e. where a path wiggled in and out of a park slightly, creating multiple intersection points) February 9, 2023 Page 1 of 3 Page 32 of 65 Attachment A.4 4. Steps 1-3 repeated for path intersections with the University of Oregon landscape zones within the Greenway (i.e. North Campus area) 5. Resulting points from WG parks and UO/WG landscape merged into one layer. 6. Points were manually deleted where public access was wrongfully determined in the above analysis (i.e. gated neighborhood, unimproved path) 7. The resulting points layer was manually revised to include': 1. Points where there are planned multi-use access paths noted in the Eugene 2035 Transportation System Plan (TSP) 2. Using 2021 aerial imagery, points that had been missed where improved right- of-way and multi-use paths intersected with the greenway boundary or intersected with multi-use paths leading to the Willamette River inside of the Willamette Greenway overlay. 8. Two text attribute fields were then added to the access points layer: Location and CType (Connection Type). Points were then assigned either Boundary or Internal under the Location field and either Multi-use Path, Improved Street, or Bridge under the CType field. 9. Points located on Improved Streets were manually revised to be moved to the centerline of right-of-way. Service Area Analysis The service area analysis identifies two categories of tax lots: Tax Lots Within 500' of Public Access Points Tax Lots Not Within 500' of Public Access Points The second category of tax lots would therefore be subject to the standard at EC 9.8812(4)(a)2. 10. The taxlot layer from the Regional Land Information Database (RLID) was exported on January 22, 2023 (the effective date of the TL layer) 11. The taxlot layer was then clipped to the HUB Willamette Greenway Layer. This layer will be used with the resulting service area analysis to determine which taxlots are more than 500' walking distance from a public access point. 12. A text attribute field, "Within500ft," was added to the clipped taxlot layer to be used later on. 13. A service area analysis was then performed: 1. LCOGs Walking Network Dataset (based on data from OSM) was set as the network dataset. 2. Created new service area analysis 3. Mode set to "On foot", Direction set to "Away from Facilities" and Cutoff set at "500 ft." 4. Imported the Access Points Layer (developed in steps 1-9 above) as facilities. 1. In Field Mappings use geometry, OBJECTID was used as Field Name, append to existing locations and Snap to Network were both checked 1 The manual revision of the public access points resulted in an addition of 66 points. February 9, 2023 Page 2 of 3 Page 33 of 65 Attachment A.4 with a 25 ft snap offset. In the advanced menu, a 50 ft search tolerance was set. 5. The BarriersToWalking layer from LCOGs network dataset was imported as Line Barriers to the service analysis. 6. The Output Geometry was set at standard precision, overlap, and disks. The Polygon trim distance was set at 50 ft in order to account for width of right-of- way. 7. The service area analysis was run and resulted in a polygon layer. 14. Using the 'Select by Location' function, taxlots from the Taxlot layer developed in Steps 10-12 were selected where they intersected with resulting polygons from the service area analysis. These taxlots are determined to be within 500' walking distance of a public access point and are exempt from the standards. 15. Using calculate geometry, taxlots selected in Step 14 were noted as "Yes" within the "Within 500 ft" attribute field. February 9, 2023 Page 3 of 3 Page 34 of 65 Attachment B Exhibit F to Ordinance No. 20351 Native and Non-Native Plant List Page 35 of 65 Attachment B Part 2 NATIVE PLANT SPECIES FOR SITES AT OR BELOW 500 FEET IN ELEVATION WITHIN THE EUGENE UGB The plant species included in this list are species that grow and propagate themselves in the Eugene area through natural processes, are adapted to the weather, soils and hydrology of the area, and have evolved in the area or been introduced to the area by natural causes. These native plant species are distinguished from plant species that have been deliberately or accidentally imported or introduced from other areas by humans or human activities. This list applies to all habitat types, including riparian, upland and wetland areas, below 500 feet in elevation within the UGB, except within the West Eugene Wetlands Plan area, and within seasonal wet prairie habitats (see Part 3). To meet Eugene Code requirements for native plants, these species are to be used within the specified geographic area and elevation. Do not substitute alternate species. You must use the specific species, subspecies or variety listed. Wetland Indicator Status and Site Suitability information in the table below is intended as a guideline for identifying suitable locations for plant species based on additional site characteristics, such as soils and hydrology. Trees Wetland Indicator Site Common Name Scientific Name Status Suitability grand fir Abies grandis NOL UB vine maple Acer circinatum FACU+ UB Oregon bigleaf maple Acer macrophyllum FACU UB white alder Alnus rhombifolia FACW LB, UB red alder Alnus rubra FAC LB, UB incense-cedar Calocedrus decurrens NOL UB Pacific dogwood Cornus nutallii NOL UB Oregon ash Fraxinus latifolia FACW LB, UB ponderosa pine Pinus ponderosa FACU UB black cottonwood Populus balsamifera FAC LB ssp. trichocarpa Douglas-fir Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii NOL UB Oregon white oak Quercus garryana var. garryana NOL UB California black oak Quercus kelloggii NOL UB Pacific willow Salix lucida FACW+ WE, LB ssp. lasiandra western yew Taxus brevifolia FACU- UB western redcedar Thuja plicata FAC UB ExbQ~t,, Aprdinance No. 20351 Page 6 Attachment B Shrubs Wetland Indicator Site Common Name Scientific Name Status Suitability serviceberry Amelanchier alnifolia FACU UB var. semiintegrifolia tall Oregon grape Berberis aquifolium NOL UB common buckbrush Ceanothus cuneatus NOL UB Suksdorfs hawthorn Crataegus suksdorfii FAC UB var. suksdorfii red-osier dogwood Cornus sericea FACW WE, LB California hazel Corylus cornuta NI UB var. californica ocean spray Holodiscus discolor NOL UB osoberry/indian plum Oemleria cerasiformis NOL UB mock-orange Philadelphus lewisii NOL UB Pacific ninebark Physocarpus capitatus FAC+ WE, LB chokecherry Prunus virginiana FACU UB var. demissa cascara buckthorn Rhamnus purshiana FAC? UB straggly gooseberry Ribes divaricatum NI UB red currant Ribes sanguineum NOL UB baldhip rose Rosa gymnocarpa NI UB Nootka rose Rosa nutkana NI LB, UB blackcap Rubus leucodermis NOL UB thimbleberry Rubus parviflorus FACU+ UB salmonberry Rubus spectabilis FAC LB, UB dewberry Rubus ursinus NOL UB Columbia River willow Salix fluviatilis OBL SW, WE Piper's willow Salix hookeriana (piperi) FACW LB Scouler's willow Salix scouleriana FAC LB, UB Sitka willow Salix sitchensis FACW WE, LB blue elderberry Sambucus mexicana (cerulea) FAC- UB red elderberry Sambucus racemosa FACU UB var. arborescens Douglas spiraea Spiraea douglasii var. douglasii FACW WE, LB snowberry Symphoricarpos albus var.laevigatus FACU UB oval-leaved viburnum Viburnum ellipticum NOL UB ExbQjtXAprdinance No. 20351 Page 7 Attachment B Vines Wetland Indicator Site Common Name Scientific Name Status Suitability wild clematis Clematis ligusticifolia FACU UB orange honeysuckle Lonicera ciliosa NOL UB hairy honeysuckle Lonicera hispidula NOL UB Herbaceous Plants Wetland Indicator Site Common Name Scientific Name Status Suitability vanilla-leaf Achlys triphylla NOL UB baneberry Actaea rubra NOL UB pathfinder Adenocaulon bicolor NOL UB red columbine Aquilegia formosa FAC LB, UB wild ginger Asarum caudatum NOL UB lady-fern Athyrium filix femina FAC WE, LB, UB American wintercress Barbarea orthoceras FACW+ LB camas Camassia leichtlinii FACW- LB, UW wood bittercress Cardamine angulata FACW LB, UB spring beauty Cardamine nuttallii var. nuttallii NOL UB small-flowered claytonia Claytonia parviflora NOL UB miner's lettuce Claytonia perfoliata FAC UB candyflower Claytonia sibirica FACW UB tall larkspur Delphinium trolliifolium NOL UB bleeding heart Dicentra formosa NOL UB coastal shield fern Dryoptera arguta NOL UB Watson's willow herb Epilobium ciliatum (watsonii) FACW- LB Oregon fawn lily Erythronium oregonum NOL UB large-leaf avens Geum macrophyllum FACW+ LB, UB lowland cudweed Gnaphalium palustre FAC+ UB Willamette valley gumweed Grindelia integrifolia FACW WE, LB cow-parsnip Heracleum lanatum FAC UB Pacific waterleaf Hydrophyllum tenuipes NOL UB bog St. John's-wort Hypericum anagalloides OBL SW, WE tiger lily Lilium columbianum FAC UB miniature lupine Lupinus polycarpus NOL UB riverbank lupine Lupinus rivularis FAC UB skunk cabbage Lysichiton americanus OBL SW, WE big smilacina Maianthemum racemosa FAG UB little smilacina Maianthemum stellaum FAG UB Oregon bigroot Marah oreganus NOL UB western bluebell Mertensia platyphylla NOL UB water montia Montia fontana OBL SW, WE ExbQjt,, Aprdinance No. 20351 Page 8 Attachment B aquatic claytonia Montia linearis NOL LB, UB small forget-me-not Myosotis laxa OBL SW, WE small-flowered nemophila Nemophila parviflora var. nemophylla NOL UB water-parsley Oenanthe sarmentosa OBL SW, WE sweet cicely Osmorhiza berteroi NOL UB w. yellow wood sorrel Oxalis suksdorfii NOL UB sweet colt's-foot Petasites frigidus FACW LB var. palmatus woodland phacelia Phacelia nemoralis FACU UB swordfern Polystichum munitum NOL UB Hooker's fairy bells Prosartes hookeri NOL UB self-heal Prunella vulgaris var. lanceolata FACU+ UB white water buttercup Ranunculus aquatilis OBL SW,WE woods buttercup Ranunculus uncinatus FAC UB western dock Rumex occidentalis FAG UB var. procerus willow leaved dock Rumex salicifolius FACW WE Pacific sanicle Sanicula crassicaulis NOL UB yerba buena Satureja douglasii NOL UB small-fruited bulrush Scirpus microcarpus OBL WE Hitchcock's blue-eyed grass Sisyrinchium hitchcockii NOL UB hedge-nettle Stachys mexicana FACW LB, UB fringecups Tellima grandiflora NOL UB western meadowrue Thalictrum occidentale FACU UB tall western meadowrue Thalictrum polycarpum NOL UB piggy-back plant Tolmiea menziesii FAC LB star-flower Trientalis latifolia FAG UB sessile trillium Trillium albidum NOL UB western trillium Trillium ovatum ssp. ovatum NOL UB stinging nettle Urtica dioica FAC+ UB inside-out flower Vancouveria hexandra NOL UB American vetch Vicia americana NI WE, LB woodland violet Viola glabella FACW+ UB Grasses, Sedges, Rushes Wetland Indicator Site Common Name Scientific Name Status Suitability Dewey's sedge Carex deweyana var. leptopoda FAC+ UB Henderson's sedge Carex hendersonii NI LB green-fruited sedge Carex interrupta OBL SW, WE slough sedge Carex obnupta OBL SW, WE sawbeak sedge Carex stipata var. stipata NOL WE, LB needle spikerush Eleocharis acicularis OBL SW, WE ExbQ~t j Aprdinance No. 20351 Page 9 Attachment B creeping spikerush Eleocharis palustris blue wild-rye Elymus glaucus ssp. glaucus tall manna grass Glyceria striata meadow barley Hordeum brachyantherum taper-tip rush Juncus acuminatus three-stamen rush Juncus ensifolius common rush Juncus effusus shiny rush Juncus laccatus pointed rush Juncus oxymeris spreading rush Juncus patens slender rush Juncus tenuis onion grass Melica subulata Key to Wetland Indicator Status OBL SW, WE FACU UB FACW+ WE, LB FACW WE, LB OBL SW, WE FACW WE, LB FACW+ SW, WE NOL SW, WE FACW+ SW, WE FACW SW, WE FAC LB NOL UB OBL = Obligate Wetland Plants. Under normal conditions, these plants almost always occur in wetlands (estimated probability of wetland occurrence 99%). FACW = Facultative Wetland Plants. Under normal conditions these plants are usually found in wetlands, but also may be found outside wetlands (estimated probability of wetland occurrence 67-99%) FAC = Facultative Plants. Under normal conditions, these plants are found equally in wetlands and non-wetlands (estimated probability of wetland occurrence 33-66%). FACU = Facultative Upland Plants. Under normal conditions, these plants are most likely to be found in non-wetlands (estimated probability of wetland occurrence 1-33%). UPL = Obligate Upland Plants. These plants are almost always found in non-wetlands, and are expected to be found in wetlands less than 1 % of the time. NOL = Not on U.S.F.W.S. wetland plant list. Key to Site Suitability SW = Shallow water WE = Water's edge LB = Lower bank UB = Upper bank and terraces above the ordinary high water line Wetland indicator status information is taken from: "National List of Plant Species That Occur In Wetlands: Northwest (Region 9)," U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, May 1988; 1993 supplement. Exhibit F to Ordinance No. 20351 Page 10 Page 40 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments Table of Contents 9.0500 Definitions ...................................................................................................................................2 9.3725 S-RP Riverfront Park Special Area Zone - Review Procedures 3 9.5750 Telecommunication Devices - Siting Requirements and Procedures ..4 9.6885 Tree Preservation and Removal Standards ..4 9.7005 Pre-application Conference 12 9.7030 Recordation of Certain City Decisions . 12 9.7055 Applications and Review Authorities 12 9.7305 Type III Application Requirements and Criteria Reference 13 9.7210 Notice of Application 13 9.7220 Notice of Decision 13 9.7305 Type III Application Requirements and Criteria Reference 14 9.7315 Public Hearing Notice 14 9.7335 Notice of Decision 15 9.7340 Expiration 15 9.7605 Filing of Appeal of Planning Director's Decision 15 9.7615 Public Hearing Notice 16 9.7635 Notice of Decision 16 9.7665 Public Hearing Notice 17 9.7685 Notice of Decision 17 9.8005 Applicability and Effect of Application Requirements, Criteria, and Concurrent Review 18 9.8030 Adjustment Review - Approval Criteria 18 9.8800 Purpose of Willamette River Greenway Permits 19 9.8805 Willamette River Greenway Permits - Applicability 20 9.8810 Willamette River Greenway Permits - Application Requirements 20 9.8811 Willamette River Greenway Setback - Clear and Objective 20 9.8812 Willamette River Greenway Permit Approval Criteria - Clear and Objective 21 9.8815 Willamette River Greenway Permit Approval Criteria - General 22 9.8825 Modifications to a Willamette River Greenway Permit 24 Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 1 of 25 Page 41 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments Amendments Guide: The following types of text are included in the document below. Existing Black Text = Existing land use code that will remain unchanged. nderlined Blue Ti = Text proposed for addition to the land use code. Strikethrough Red Text = Text proposed for removal from the land use code. Highlighted Text = Text to be updated upon adoption of final ordinance. *Minor Revision on January 20, 2023: At EC 9.6885(2)(a)2, a year ("2014") was added to the edition of American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Section A300, Tree, Shrub and Other Woody Plant Maintenance Standard Practices. This change is to correct a missing year citation from the previous code amendments. This creates consistency within the section, as the other references to ANSI standards also specific the "2014" edition.(See revision on Page 5) 9.0500 Definitions. ` Change of Use. (A) Except as provided in (B), a change from the existing use to another land use according to the land use and permit requirement tables in this land use code. (B) As used in Willamette gr Greenway Permits beginning at EC 9.8800, making a different use of the land or water than that which existed on December 6, 1975. It includes only a change that requires construction, alterations of the land, water, or other areas outside of existing buildings or structures and that substantially affects the land or water. It does not include a change of use of a building or other structure that does not substantially alter or affect the land or water upon which it is situated. The sale of property is not in itself considered to be a change of use. An existing open storage area shall be considered to be the same as a building for purposes of defining "change of use" with regard to Willamette River Greenway permits. Intensification (as used in Willamette _Greenway Permits beginning at EC 9.8800). Any additions that increase or expand the area or amount of an existing use, or the level of activity. Remodeling the exterior of a structure not excluded below is an intensification when it will substantially alter the appearance of the structure. Maintenance and repair that is usual and necessary for the continuance of an existing use is not an intensification of use. Reasonable emergency procedures necessary for the safety or the protection of property are not an intensification of use. Residential use of lands within the Greenway includes the practices and activities customarily related to the use and enjoyment of one's home. Landscaping, construction of driveways, modification of existing structures or construction of-or placement of such subsidiary structures or facilities adjacent to the residence er placement ^f °„wh subsidiary structures as are usual and necessary to such use and enjoyment shall not be considered an intensification. Seasonal increases in gravel operations shall not be considered an intensification of use. Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 2 of 25 Page 42 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments Water-dependent. A use or activity which can be carried out only on, in, or adjacent to water areas because the use requires access to the water body for water-borne transportation, recreation, energy production, or source of water. Water-related. Uses which are not directly dependent upon access to a water body but which provide goods or services that are directly associated with water-dependent land or waterway use, and which, if not located adiacent to water, would result in a public loss of quality in the goods or services offered. Except as necessary for water-dependent or water-related uses or facilities, residences, parking lots, spoil and dump sites, roads and highways, restaurants, businesses, factories, and trailer parks are not eenerally considered dependent on or related to water location needs. 9.3725 S-RP Riverfront Park Special Area Zone - Review Procedures. The master site plan for developments proposed within the S-RP zone shall be reviewed through the conditional use permit process provided in this land use code. For the purpose of this review, the following criteria shall be applied in lieu of the criteria provided in EC 9.8090 Conditional Use Permit Approval Criteria - General. (1) Criteria for all Development. (a) The proposed development shall be consistent with the Metropolitan Area General Plan, Riverfront Park Study, and other applicable policy documents or functional plans. (b) Based on technical analysis (particularly with respect to transportation facilities), planned public facilities shall be shown to accommodate the requirements of the proposed development. (c) The proposed development shall protect visual access from main entry points from Franklin Boulevard to the river/riparian vegetation. (2) Criteria for Development Within Willamette Riv Greenway Boundaries. The height and bulk of the proposed development shall be designed to consider the impacts on public open space, especially the buffer strips along the Willamette River and Millrace, and to adhere to the height limitations specified along the Willamette River. Building setbacks shall be varied to avoid the effect of a continuous wall along the minimum setback line and to adhere to the requirement for protection of designated features (i.e., Millrace and pedestrian linkage to the Autzen Stadium footbridge). 3. To the greatest possible degree, the intensification, change of use, or development will provide the maximum possible landscaped area, open space, or vegetation between the activity and the river. Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 3 of 25 Page 43 of 65 1. Compliance with the criteria in EC 9.3725(1) Criteria for all Development above. Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments 4. To the maximum extent practicable, the proposed development shall provide for protection and enhancement of the natural vegetative fringe along the Willamette River. This means protection and enhancement of trees and understory characteristic of native vegetation within the riparian strip along the Willamette River. It also means removal, and active management to prevent reintroduction of, disturbance vegetation such as Himalayan blackberries and English ivy. As used herein, the riparian strip means the area between the top of the river bank and the water's edge. To the greatest possible degree, necessary and adequate public access will be provided to and along the river by appropriate legal means. (b) An applicant proposing to develop multiple-unit dwellings on properties zoned S-RP Riverfront Park Special Area Zone and located within the boundary of the Willamette River Greenway as allowed by EC 9.3710. shall elect to proceed either Dursuant to the criteria in subsection (a) or ursuant to the criteria in EC 9.8812. As used in this section, the words "greatest possible degree" are drawn from Statewide Planning Goal 15 (F.3.b.) and are intended to require a balancing of factors so that each of the identified Greenway criteria is protected to the greatest extent possible without precluding the requested use. Goal 15 (C.3.j.) provides that "lands committed to urban uses within the Greenway shall be permitted to continue as urban uses." (3) Interpretation. In the event any of the terms used in these S-RP zone provisions require interpretation, the planning and development director shall be responsible for such interpretation. 9.5750 Telecommunication Devices - Siting Requirements and Procedures. (5) Construction of Transmission Tower. Construction of a transmission tower, or a modification of an existing transmission tower to increase its height, shall be allowed as follows: (d) Prohibited Zones and Locations. No new transmission tower shall be permitted in any zones not included in subparagraphs (a) to (c) above, including the AG, R-2, R-3, R-4, H, NR, and PRO zones; or in the Willamette River Greenway, on Gillespie Butte above the elevation of 450 feet, on the ridgeline as defined in the South Hills Study or on Judkins Point. 9.6885 Tree Preservation and Removal Standards. (1) Exemptions from Standards. The standards in this section do not apply to activities regulated under EC 9.4900 through 9.4890, or an application for development activity that includes or will result in: Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 4 of 25 Page 44 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments (c) Land Use Approvals. Any tree removal on property subject to an approved Ceonditional Uese Ppermit, P-planned Uenit Ddevelopment, Ssite Review, e-F Ssubdivision, or Willamette River Greenway Permit that includes a tree removal/preservation plan or conditions related to tree removal or retention. In those areas, that plan or city approved modifications thereto control tree removal. This exemption does not apply to the removal of a street tree, which must be authorized by a permit issued pursuant to EC 6.305. (2) Tree Preservation and Removal Standards. The standards in this subsection apply only to land use applications processed under EC 9.8100, EC 9.8325, EC 9.8445, a-R4 EC 9.8520, and EC 9.8812. Unless exempt under subparagraph (lad) below, no permit for a development activity subject to this section shall be approved until the applicant demonstrates compliance with the standards in this subsection. (a) Definitions. For the purposes of this subsection (2), the following definitions apply: 1. Critical Root Zone (CRZ). That area surrounding a tree that has a radius of 12 inches multiplied by the diameter breast height expressed in inches of the tree trunk or trunks. Tree Removal. To fell or sever a tree or to use any procedure the natural result of which is to cause the death or substantial destruction of the tree. Substantial destruction includes actions that destroy more than 20% of the critical root zone of a tree, or topping, or severing the cambial material on 50% or more of the circumference of the tree trunk. Remove does not in any context include those pruning standards as defined in the 2014 edition of American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Section A300, Tree, Shrub and Other Woody Plant Maintenance Standard Practices an effect At the tame the (b) For the purposes of this subsection (2), the South Hills Area is defined as all property located within the City's adopted Urban Growth Boundary, above an elevation of 500 feet, and: 1. South of 18th Avenue, 2. South of Franklin Boulevard and East of the intersection of 18th Avenue and Agate Street, or 3. If 18th Avenue were extended from the intersection of 18th Avenue and Willow Creek Road directly west to the Urban Growth Boundary, the area south of that extension of 18th Avenue. For the purposes of this subsection (2). the Willamette River Greenwav is defined as all lands within the adopted Willamette River Greenwav Bound established by Resolution No. 2592, and the Willamette River Greenway Setback is that area identified on the Willamette River Greenway Setback Map adopted as Exhibit X to Ordinance No. XXXXX. (sd) Exemptions. A proposed development shall be exempt from the requirements of EC 9.6885(2) if any of the following apply: 1. Except as provided in subparagraphs 4. and 5., the area of the development Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 5 of 25 Page 45 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments site is less than 20,000 square feet. 2. Except as provided in subparagraph 5., f-Pive or fewer significant trees exist on the development site prior to development. 3. Except as provided in subparagraph 5., tThe development site is zoned R-2 Medium- Density Residential, R-3 Limited High-Density Residential, R-4 High Density Residential, GO General Office, C-2 Community Commercial, or C-3 Major Commercial zones. 4. Notwithstanding subparagraph 1., development sites that include property at or above 900 feet elevation are subject to the requirements of EC 9.6885(2), regardless of the area of the development site. 5. Notwithstanding subparagraphs 1. through 4. above, any portion of a development site located within Willamette River Greenway Tree Preservation Zones 1-3. as depicted on Figure 9.6885(2)(e). shall be subiect to the reauirements of EC 9.6885(2). (dJ Tree Preservation Requirements. Unless adjusted per EC 9.8030(13), significant trees must be preserved in accordance with the requirements of Table 9.6855(2)(4j e. Minimum preservation is based on the total existing Diameter Breast Height (d.b.h.) of significant trees within each specific location category prior to development. Maximum mitigation is the percentage of the minimum preservation that may be mitigated according to subsection 2. below. Table 9.6885(2)( 4) Tree Preservation and Mitigation Minimum Maximum Location Category Preservation Mitigation Outside the South Hills Area 40% 100% Within the South Hills Area, between 500 feet and 900 feet elevation 50% 50% Within the South Hills Area, at or above 900 feet elevation 50% 0% 9.6885(2)(e)) , in 50% 0% Willamette River Greenway Tree Preservation Zone 2 (See Figure 50% 50% 9.6885(2)(e)) Willamette River Greenway Tree Preservation Zone 3 (See Figure 40% 100% 9.6885(2)(e)) A Tree Preservation and Removal Plan is required except as provided in EC 9.6885(2)(ed) or EC 9.6885(2)(ed)3. The plan must be prepared by a certified arborist, licensed landscape architect, licensed engineer, or licensed surveyor and shall provide the following: a. A table, organized by the location categories listed in Table 9.6885(2)(de), listing all significant trees on the development site and including the following information for each listed tree: Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 6 of 25 Page 46 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments (1) Diameter Breast Height (d.b.h.) (2) Preservation, removal, or mitigation status (3) Common name, genus and species b. A site plan that includes the following information: (1) The locations of all significant trees on the development site, the Diameter Breast Height (d.b.h.) for each significant tree, whether each significant tree is to be preserved, removed, or mitigated according to EC 9.6885(2)(ed)2., and the location of the critical root zone (CRZ) for each significant tree to be preserved. (2) The location of all existing and/or proposed public and private utility easements, driveways, and areas of grading or excavation on the development site. (3) The location of all existing development on the site as well as the location of development proposed in the land use application that triggers the requirement for a Tree Preservation and Removal Plan. (4) Proposed lot or parcel boundaries. (5) For development sites with any portion located within the South Hills Area, identification of areas at or above 500 feet elevation and areas at or above 900 feet elevation. c. A written statement from a certified arborist or licensed landscape architect that the Tree Preservation and Removal Plan meets EC 9.6885(2)( 4) Tree Preservation Requirements. If the Tree Preservation and Removal Plan is prepared by a certified arborist or licensed landscape architect, then the written statement otherwise required by this subparagraph is not required. Mitigation. An applicant may elect to mitigate a portion of the minimum preservation of significant trees on the development site as provided below: a. The maximum d.b.h. that can be mitigated shall be based on location category as provided in Table EC 9.6885(2)(de) Tree Preservation and Mitigation. b. Proposed subdivisions in areas outside of the South Hills Area and of itside of the Willamette River Greenway Boundary may mitigate up to 100% of the minimum tree preservation requirement by either: (1) Providing that lots up to 7,000 square feet in area will contain a 1911 minimum of two trees and lots 7,000 square feet or more will contain a minimum of three trees; or, (2) Providing one replacement tree for each significant tree designated for mitigation. C. Reauired mitigation may only occur within the Willamette River Greenway Setback if the proposed trees to be planted are selected from the native trees included on the City's adopted list of plant species for sites at or below 500 feet in elevation. attached as Exhibit F to Ordinance No. 20351. d_c. Installation and Maintenance. Unless otherwise specified, each significant tree designated for mitigation must be replaced with one tree selected from the approved species listed in Table 9.6885(2)(ed)2 within one year from the date of removal or prior to final occupancy, Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 7 of 25 Page 47 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments whichever is later. Trees planted in accordance with subparagraph 2 e 2.b.b444 must be planted prior to final occupancy. At the time of planting, deciduous trees used for replacement must have a minimum diameter of 2 inches and evergreen trees used for replacement must be a minimum of 5 feet in height as measured according to the 2014 edition of the American Standard for Nursery Stock (ANSI Z60.1), published by the American Nursery and Landscape Association. Any mitigation tre to be planted within the WillamE e River Greenway Setback shall be selected from the native trees included on the City's adopted list of plant species for sites at or below 500 feet in elevation, attached as Exhibit F to Ordinance No. 20351. de. The maximum mitigation allowance may be adjusted in accordance with EC 9.8030(13). Table 9.6885(2)(d )2. Approved Species List Genus and Species Common Name Abies koreana Silver Korean Fir Abies pinsapo Spanish Fir Acer circinatum Vine Maple Acer ginnala Amur Maple Acer glabrum var. douglasii Rocky Mountain Maple Acer griseum Paperbark Maple Acer macrophyllum Big Leaf Maple Acer rubrum Red Maple Acer saccharum Sugar Maple Alnus rhombifolia White Alder Alnus rubra Red Alder Amelanchier alnifolia Pacific Serviceberry Arbutus menziesii Pacific Madrone Arbutus unedo Strawberry Madrone Arbutus 'Marina' Marina Strawberry Tree Betula nigra River Birch Calocedrus decurrens Incense Cedar Carpinus betulus European Hornbeam Carpinus caroliniana American Hornbeam Castanopsis cuspidate Japanese Chinquapin Catalpa speciose Northern Catalpa Cedrus atlantica Atlas Cedar Cedrus deodara Deodar Cedar Cedrus libani Cedar of Lebanon Celtis occidentalis Common Hackberry Cercidiphyllum japonicum Katsura Tree Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 8 of 25 Page 48 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments Table 9.6885(2)(4 )2. Approved Species List Genus and Species Common Name Chrysolepis chrysophylla Golden Chinquapin Cinnamomum chekiangense Camphor Tree Cornus nuttallii Pacific Dogwood Corylus colurna Turkish Filbert Cupressus arizonica Arizona Cypress Cupressus bakeri Modoc Cypress Cupressus leylandii Leyland Cypress Fraxinus latifolia Oregon Ash Fraxinus ornus Flowering Ash Ginkgo biloba (fruitless cultivars only) Ginkgo Koelreuteria paniculate Goldenrain Tree Maackia amurensis Maackia Nyssa sylvatica Tupelo, Black Gum Ostrya virginiana American Hophornbeam Oxydendrum aroboreum Sourwood Parrotia persica Persian Ironwood Picea smithiana Morinda Spruce Pinus ponderosa Ponderosa Pine Pinus ponderosa var. benthamania Willamette Valley Ponderosa Pine Pinus wallichiana Himalayan Pine Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistachio Platanus acerifolia London Plane Prunus virginiana Chokecherry Pseudotsuga menziesii Douglas Fir Quercus acutissima Sawtooth Oak Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak Quercus alba White Oak Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak Quercus chrysolepis Canyon Live Oak Quercus douglasii Blue Oak Quercus frainetto Hungarian Oak Quercus gambelii Gambel Oak Quercus garryana Oregon White Oak Quercus hypoleucoides Silver Oak Quercus ilex Holly Oak Quercus kelloggii California Black Oak Quercus lobate Valley Oak Quercus macrocarpa Bur Oak Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 9 of 25 Page 49 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments Table 9.6885(2)(4 )2. Approved Species List Genus and Species Common Name Quercus myrsinifolia Chinese Evergreen Oak Quercus palustris Pin Oak Quercus phellos Willow Oak Quercus rubra Red Oak Quercus shumardii Shumardii Oak Quercus suber Cork Oak Quercus wislizeni Interior Live Oak Rhamnus purshiana Cascara Buckthorn Salix lucida ssp. Lasiandra Pacific Willow Salix scouleriana Scouler's Willow Sciadopitys verticillate Japanese Umbrella Pine Sequoia sempervirens Coast Redwood Sequoiadendron giganteum Giant Sequoia Stewartia pseudocamellia Stewartia Styrax japonicus (japonica) Japanese Snowbell Taxodium distichum Bald Cypress Taxus brevifolia Pacific Yew Thuja plicata Western Red Cedar Tilia Americana American Linden Tilia cordata Little Leaf Linden Tilia tomentosa Silver Linden Tsuga canadensis Canadian Hemlock Tsuga heterophylla Western Hemlock Tsuga mertensiana Mountain Hemlock Tsuga sieboldii Southern Japanese Hemlock Ulmus americana American Elm Ulmus carpinifolia Smoothleaf Elm Ulmus parvifolia Chinese Elm Ulmus propinqua Japanese Elm Umbellularia californica California Bay Laurel Zelkovaserrata Zelkova Tree Preservation Area Alternative. A Tree Preservation and Removal Plan is not required if the applicant chooses to preserve at least 50 percent of the total existing d.b.h. of significant trees on the development site within one or more tree preservation area(s) and the following requirements are met: Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 10 of 25 Page 50 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments (1) Tree preservation area(s) must be delineated and shown on a site plan submitted for approval by the City. (2) Applicant must provide written certification from a certified arborist or licensed landscape architect stating that the area(s) designated for tree preservation include(s) at least 50 percent of the total existing d.b.h. of significant trees on the development site. 3) No trees within the Willamette River Greenwav Setback m count towarc e 50 perce preservation requirement. b. Mitigation is not allowed when the Tree Preservation Area Alternative is used to meet tree preservation requirements, except as approved through an adjustment review according to EC 9.8030(13). 4. Protection Standards. The following notes must be included on the final plan set submitted for approval by the City and shall apply at the time of development: a. "Protective fencing for trees identified to be preserved shall be installed by the applicant and inspected by the City prior to beginning any development activities. All protective tree fencing must remain in place until completion of all construction activities; any relocation, removal, or modification of the protective fencing shall only occur under the direction of a certified arborist and a written explanation of the reason for the relocation, removal, or modification of the protective fencing from the certified arborist must be provided to the City." b. "At the time of building permit, a site plan in compliance with the approved tree preservation and removal plan is required." C. "No excavation, grading, material storage, staging, vehicle parking or other construction activity shall take place within protective tree fencing areas." d. "The removal of trees not designated to be preserved is optional; removal may occur at the owner's discretion." e. "Any tree designated for mitigation must be replaced with one tree selected from the approved species listed in Table 9.6885(2)(de)2 within one year from the date of removal or prior to final 14 occupancy, whichever is later. At the time of planting, deciduous trees used for replacement must have a minimum diameter of 2 inches and evergreen trees used for replacement must be a minimum of 6 feet in height as measured according to the 2014 edition of the American Standard for Nursery Stock (ANSI Z60.1), published by the American Nursery and Landscape Association. Maintenance of replacement trees is the ongoing responsibility of the property owner." f. "In the event a tree designated to be preserved must be removed because it is dead, diseased, dying, or hazardous, documentation of the tree's dead, diseased, dying, or hazardous condition by a certified arborist must be provided to the City prior to tree removal. The tree must be replaced with one replacement tree Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 11 of 25 Page 51 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments selected from the approved species list in Table 9.6885(2)(de)2. At the time of planting, deciduous trees used for replacement must have a minimum diameter of 2 inches and evergreen trees used for replacement must be a minimum of 6 feet in height as measured according to the 2014 edition of the American Standard for Nursery Stock (ANSI Z60.1), published by the American Nursery and Landscape Association. Maintenance of replacement trees is the ongoing responsibility of the property owner." (ef) Street Tree Removal. If the proposal includes removal of any street tree(s), removal of those street trees has been approved, or approved with conditions according to the process at EC 6.305 Tree Felling Prohibition. 9.7005 Pre-application Conference. (3) Willamette River Greenway Permits. 9.7030 Recordation of Certain City Decisions. (9) Willamette River Greenway permit and any modifications. 9.7055 Applications and Review Authorities. h Table 9.7055 Applications and Review Authorities R = Recommendation, D = Decision Maker, A = Appeal Review Authority Historic Planning Hearings Planning City Application Type Review Director Official Commission Council Board Willamette River III D A Greenway Permit Clear and Olo ective Willamette River D A Greenway Permit - General Willamette River II D A Greenway Permit, Modification Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 12 of 25 Page 52 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments 9.7305 Type III Application Requirements and Criteria Reference. Table 9.7305 Type III Application Requirements and Criteria Type III Applications Beginning Reference Willamette River Greenway Permit - Clear and EC 9.8800 Objective Willamette River Greenway Permit - General EC 9.8800 9.7210 Notice of Application. 1%, (4) Within 10 days of the city's determination that an application is complete, but no less than 20 days before the planning director makes a decision, written notice of the application shall be mailed to all of the following: (a) Applicant. (b) Owners and occupants of the subject property. (c) Owners and occupants of properties located within 300 feet of the perimeter of the subject property. (d) Neighborhood group or community organization officially recognized by the city council that includes the area of the subject property. (e) Community organizations that have submitted written requests for notification. (f) For final partitions, final subdivisions, and final PUDs, to interested parties of record from the tentative decision. (g) For modification applications, to persons who requested notice of the original application that is being modified. (h) For Willamette River Greenway Permit modification applications, to the Oregon Department of Transportation and Oregon Parks and Recreation Department, by certified mail, return receipt requested. 9.7220 Notice of Decision. (1) Within 5 days after the planning director renders a decision, notice of the decision shall be mailed to the following: Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 13 of 25 Page 53 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments (a) Applicant. (b) Owner and occupants of the subject property. (c) Neighborhood group or community organization officially recognized by the city that includes the area of the subject property. (d) Any group or individual who submitted written comments during the comment period. (e) Those groups or individuals who requested notice of the decision. (f) Property owners and occupants of property located within 300 feet of the perimeter of the subject property. (g) For decisions on Willamette River Greenwav Permit modification applications, to the Oregon Department of Transportation and Oregon Parks and Recreation Department. 9.7305 Type III Application Requirements and Criteria Reference. Table 9.7305 Type III Application Requirements and Criteria Type III Applications Beginning Reference Adjustment Review (when part of a Type III Application) EC 9.8015 Conditional Use Permits (CUP) EC 9.8075 Historic Landmark Designation EC 9.8150 Planned Unit Development, Tentative Plan EC 9.8300 Willamette River Greenwav Permit - Clear ar Objective -9.8800 Willamette Greenway Permit - General EC 9.8800 Zone Changes* EC 9.8850 9.7315 Public Hearing Notice. (2) At least 30 days prior to the hearing, written notice of the public hearing and the nature of the request shall be mailed to all of the following: (f) For Willamette River Greenway P-permits, public hearing notice shall also be provided to the Oregon Department of Transportation and Oregon Parks and Recreation Department, certified mail, return receipt requested. Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 14 of 25 Page 54 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments 9.7335 Notice of Decision. (e) For Willamette River Greenway Ppermits, to the Oregon Department of Transportation and Oregon Parks and Recreation Department. 9.7340 Expiration. (4) Unless the decision specifies otherwise, a Willamette Greenway. permit approval shall expire 18 months after the effective date of approval unless actual construction or alteration has begun under a required permit, or in the case of a permit not involving construction or alteration, actual commencement of the authorized activity has begun. However, the applicant may submit a modification application at any time before the 18- month period has expired, requesting an extension of the approval period. The applicant may request more than one extension. Under no circumstances, however, can the total combined extension periods exceed 36 months from the original expiration date. Within S- DR, upon approval of a Willamette Greenway Permit concurrently with Type V code amendments and other plan amendments, plan adoption, or zone change; the Willamette Riv( Greenway Ppermit shall remain in effect so long as the S-DR zone remains in effect. 9.7605 Filing of Appeal of Planning Director's Decision. (1) Within 12 days of the date of the mailing of the planning director's decision, the decision may be appealed to the hearings official or historic review board according to the appeal review authority specified in Table 9.7055 Applications and Review Authorities by the following: (a) Applicant. (b) Owner of the subject property. (c) Neighborhood group officially recognized by the city that includes the area of the subject property. (d) Any person who submitted written comments in regards to the original application. (e) A person entitled to notice of the original application. (f) A person adversely affected or aggrieved by the initial decision. (2) The appeal shall be submitted on a form approved by the city manager, be accompanied by a fee established pursuant to EC Chapter 2, and be received by the city no later than 5:00 p.m. of the 12th day after the notice of decision is mailed. The record from the planning Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 15 of 25 Page 55 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments director's proceeding shall be forwarded to the appeal review authority. New evidence pertaining to appeal issues shall be accepted. (3) The appeal shall include a statement of issues on appeal -^d"^'"~`ited to the .0°,--^° ramSe d -tee appeal.. The appeal statement shall explain specifically how the planning director's decision is inconsistent with applicable criteria. Appeals of planning director decisions on applications for permit as defined in ORS Chapter 227 shall not be limited to the issued raised in the appeal statement. Appeals of planning director decisions on all other applications shall be limited to the issues raised in the appeal statement. 9.7615 Public Hearing Notice. (3) At least 20 days prior to the hearing, written notice shall be mailed to all of the following: (a) Applicant. (b) Owner of the subject property. (c) Appellant. (d) Neighborhood group or community organization officially recognized by the city that includes the area of the subject property. (e) Any person who provided written comments prior to the close of the public comment period. (f) Owners of property within 100 feet of the perimeter of the subject property. Department. 9.7635 Notice of Decision. (4) Within 5 days after a decision by the appeal review authority is rendered, notice of the decision shall be mailed to all of the following: (a) Applicant. (b) Owner of the subject property. (c) Appellant. (d) Any person who provided oral or written testimony in a timely manner during the hearing procedures. (e) Any person who requested notice of the appeal decision. Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 16 of 25 Page 56 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments (f) For Willamette River Greenway Permit modification decisions, notice of the decision shall also be provided to the Oregon Department of Transportation and Oregon Parks and Recreation Department. 9.7665 Public Hearing Notice. (5) At least 10 days prior to the hearing, written notice of the hearing shall be mailed to the following: (a) Applicant. (b) Owner of the subject property. (c) Appellant. , (d) Neighborhood group or community organization officially recognized by the city that includes the area of the subject property. (e) Any person who submitted written comments in regards to the original application. (f) Any person who requested notice of the previous decision or of the appellate hearing. (g) For Willamette River Greenway Permits, public hearing notice shall also be provided to the Oregon Department of Transportation and Oregon Parks and Recreation Department. 9.7685 Notice of Decision. (6) Within 5 days after the planning commission's decision is rendered, written notice of the decision shall be mailed to all of the following: (a) Applicant. (b) Owner of the subject property. (c) Appellant. (d) Any person who provided oral or written testimony in a timely manner during the hearing procedures. (e) Any person who requested notice of the appeal decision. For Willamette River Greenway Permits, notice of the decision shall also be provided to the Oregon Department of Transportation and Oregon Parks and Recreation Department. Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 17 of 25 Page 57 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments 9.8005 Applicability and Effect of Application Requirements, Criteria, and Concurrent Review. (2) If an initial proposal also requires an application be submitted for one or more of the following: (e) Willamette River Greenway permit; or 9.8030 Adjustment Review - Approval Criteria. The planning director shall approve, conditionally approve, or deny an adjustment review application. Approval or conditional approval shall be based on compliance with the following applicable criteria. (13) Tree Preservation and Removal Standards Adjustment. The minimum tree preservation requirement and maximum mitigation allowance of EC 9.6885(2) may be adjusted if one of the conditions listed in subparagraph (a) below applies and the proposed design complies with the criteria in subparagraphs (b) thFaugh e): (a) Conditions. To qualify for an adjustment, one of the following conditions must apply: 1. Strict compliance with tree preservation and removal standards is not feasible due to other requirements of this code or existing site constraints such as topography or other natural features; or, 2. An adjustment to the minimum tree preservation and/or mitigation requirement is necessary in order to achieve a net density greater than 75 percent of the maximum net 3. The existing trees required to meet the minimum preservation requirement are unlikely to survive the level and type of anticipated development due to susceptibility to windthrow or other natural causes of failure. (b) Criteria To q' or an adjustment, the proposed design must meet the following criteri 1. The proposed reduction min the minimum tree preservation requirement or increase in mitigation allowance is necessary to accommodate a reasonable level of development. 2. In no case shall the minimum tree preservation requirement be reduced below 30% for areas at or above 900 feet elevation and areas within the Willamette River Greenway Tree Preservation Zone 1, as depicted on Figure 9.6885(2)(e). {c4 Except for areas at or above 900 feet elevation and areas within the Willamette River Greenway Tree Preservation Zone 1 as depicted on Figure 9.6885(2)(e), proposals may mitigate up to 100% of the minimum tree preservation requirement if the following requirements are met: A-1. For proposed subdivisions, new trees must be planted so that lots up to 7,000 square feet in area will contain a minimum of two trees and lots 7,000 square feet or more will contain a minimum of three trees. Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 18 of 25 Page 58 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments B-2. For all other developments, the proposed design must provide one tree per dwelling unit. develepme.nt site that -are unde.r _2 inr--hp-s Diameter Breast Height and listed in Table 9.6445(2)(gd)2 nppFeyed Speemes i ost may be designated f^r p atie ^ and (an liew of planting new tFee&~ 4. For areas at or above 900 feet elevation, and areas within the Willamette River Greenway Tree Preservation Zone 1 as depicted on Figure 9.6885(2)(e, mitigation is limited to 10% of the minimum preservation requirement. 5. For areas within the Willamette River Greenway Tree Preservation Zone 2 as depicted on Figure 9.6885(2)(e), mitigation is limited to 20% of the minimum preservation requirement. 6. New trees planted to meet mitigation requirements are subject to the requirements at EC 9.6885(2)(e)2.c. Installation and Maintenance. 7. Trees planted to meet applicable landscape standards may be counted toward mitigation requirements. 8. Except as provided in subparagraph (9), existing trees that are located on the development site may be designated for preservation and counted toward mitigation requirements in lieu of planting new trees if: A. The tree measures under 8-inches Diameter Breast Height (d.b.h.); and B. The tree is listed in Table 9.6885(2)(e)2. Approved Species List. 8. The provisions of subparagraph (8) do not apply to portions of a development site located within the Willamette River Greenway. Existing trees may be designated for preservation and counted toward mitigation requirements in lieu of planting new traac if- A. The tree measures under 8-inches Diameter Breast Height (d.b.h.); B. The tree is a species included on the City's adopted list of plant species for sites at or below 500 feet in elevation, attached as Exhibit F to Ordinance No. 20351; and C. The tree is located on the development site and within the Willamette Greenway Boundary but outside of the Willamette River Greenway Setback. No existing trees located within the Willamette River Greenway Setback may count toward mitigation requirements. For purposes of EC 9.8030(13): 1. "Willamette River Greenwav" means all lands within the adopted Willamette River Greenway Boundary established by Resolution No. 2592. 2. "Willamette River Greenway Setback" is that area identified on the Willamette River Greenway Setback Map adopted as Exhibit X to Ordinance No. XXXXX. 9.8800 Purpose of Willamette River Greenway Permits pee al eensideratien befere Fn %ith;n th^ hA-nd ,r,^,; ^fth^ Wmllam^+t^ Sr,, ,,l ; eratien ; requ4e4 The purpose of Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 19 of 25 Page 59 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments Willamette 2 ~nway Permits is to implement Oregon Statewide Planning Goal 15, Willamette River Greenway, which is designed to protect, conserve, enhance, and maintain the natural, scenic, historical, agricultural, economic, and recreational qualities of lands along the Willamette River. -,II.,..,P,.J bUt eelpldi+i^"r, ^f algpr.,.,-,I be i.,-,r.^r^rl r.eel,,,,.d R essary to rr., + rRay the purpose and i.,+.,..+ ef. the \n/ill""'.-."++^ River GFeen ,a., and +e i.,r-rr. +h-,+;; y intensification of uses changes in use, r "leyelepments within the V.1011-,.,,,.,++^ Greenway boundaries a pate ,le yi*t , nearby uses ,.,i+hin the `41ll.,imet+^ Gr^^^,.,-,.,. Protection, conservation, enhancement, and maintenance of the aualities of lands within the Willamette River Greenwav is achieved through the followine mPasurPS* (1) Review of intensification of uses, changes in use, and developments proposed within the boundaries of the Willamette River Greenway. (2) Imposition of conditions of approval as necessary to carry out the purpose and intent of the Willamette River Greenwav. 9.8805 Willamette River Greenway Permits - Applicability Willamette River Greenway permit applications are required for intensification of uses, changes in use, or developments within the boundaries of the Willamette River Greenway aeeeF&4gestablished byte Resolution No. 2592 Adopting a Willamette River Greenway Boundary. `4ill"^ ette Gr^^^..,a., .,^r i+ IpFeeeduFes FRay apply to Site Review applffieatiORS 1.YhP-.A site review appFeval is required OR AddotmAP tA I.A.101I.amp-tte GFeeRway peFFRit appFeval. No develepmeRt permit Shall be .0-s-sued by the city prior to 9.8810 GeneFall Requirements Willamette River Greenway Permits - Application Requirements (1) Willamette River Greenway Permit applications shall be considered in accordance with the Type III application procedures contained in EC 9.7000 7300 through EC 9.7340 7935 Application Procedures,_ unless considered concurrently with a Type IV or Type V application. If the intensification of use, change in use, or development that triggers the requirement for a Willamette River Greenway Permit includes or proposes housing, the written statement submitted with the Willamette River Greenway Permit application shall clearly state whether the applicant is electing to proceed under the Clear and Objective approval criteria in EC 9.8812, or whether the applicant is electing to proceed under the General approval criteria in EC 9.8815. (~3) No development permit shall be issued by the city when a Willamette River Greenway Permit is required for a proposed development until the Willamette River Greenway Permit has been approved and becomes effective. Development permits shall be consistent with the terms and conditions of that Willamette River Greenway Permit. 9.8811 Willamette River Greenway Setback - Clear and Objective 1) The Willamette River Greenway Setback is established to protect, maintain, preserve, and enhance the natural. scenic. historic. and recreational aualities of the Willamette River Greenway. Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 20 of 25 Page 60 of 65 Attachment C Willamette River Greenway Code Amendments (2) The Willamette River Greenway Setback is only applicable when the applicant elects to proceed under the Clear and Objective approval criteria in EC 9.8812. (3) The location of the Willamette River Greenway Setback is established by the Willamette River Greenway Setback Map adopted as Exhibit X to Ordinance No. XXXXX. 4) No structures. other than the structures listed in subsection (4) may be built within the Willamette River Greenway Setback. required pursuant to EC 9.8812(4) are the only structures within the Willamette Greenway Setback necessary to support water-related and/or water-dependent uses; therefore, pedestrian paths and/or public accesswavs that are proposed or otherwise required pursuant to EC 9.8812(4) are the only new structures that may be constructed within the Willamette River Greenwav Setback pursuant to a Willamette River Greenwav Permit aaaroved under EC 9.8812. 9.8812 Willamette River Greenway Permit Approval Criteria - Clear and Objective Unless an applicant proposing an intensification of use, change in use, or development that proposes or includes housing elects to use the General criteria contained in EC 9.8815, approval, approval with conditions, or denial of a Willamette River Greenway Permit that proposes or includes housing shall be based solely on compliance with the following approval criteria: (1) Greenway Setback. (a) The application shall include a site plan that clearly depicts the location of the Willamette River Greenway Setback on the subiect property, as shown on the Willamette River Greenway Setback Map referenced at EC 9.8811(3). (b) Consistent with the requirements of EC 9.8811(4), the application shall not propose any new structures located within the Willamette River Greenway Setback except pedestrian paths or public accesswavs proposed pursuant to EC 9.8812(4). (2) Building Facade. (a) For any new buildings, the maximum length of any building facade located within 100 feet of the Willamette River Greenwav Setback is 75 feet. (3) Landscaping. a) A landscape area that meets the reauirements of EC 9.6210 Low Screen Landscaae Standard (L-2) shall be provided along the length of the Willamette River Greenway Setback. The landscape area shall be located on the opposite side of the Willamette River Greenway Setback from the river and shall be a minimum depth of 10 feet. These reauirements are not adiustable under the provisions of EC 9.6210(2)(b) or EC 9.8030(3)(c). Draft: December 1, 2022 (Minor Revisions January 20, 2023) Page 21 of 25 Page 61 of 65