The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCR Materialsa;4 P(c1nniIn March 14, 2019 Colin McArthur, AICP Cameron McCarthy Landscape Architecture & Planning 160 East Broadway Eugene, OR 97401 Completeness Review for: Santa Clara Transit Station (PDT 19-1/ ARA 19-1) Thank you for your application for a Planned Unit Development and Adjustment Review, we are excited about your interest -in investing in our community. Our completeness review process provides an opportunity to collaboratively address any items that are unclear, incomplete, or missing before your application.is evaluated for consistency with our land use code. We also use this as a.n opportunity to identify other issues which may be raised during the public process. Based on our review, your application is incomplete. I look forward to working with you and the community through the next steps of this process. Feel free to reach out to me with any questions at (541) 682-8385 or JDragovich@eugene-or.gov. Sincerely, Jenessa. Dragovich Senior Planner Enclosures: Planning Completeness Review Form Public Works Completeness Review Form Incomplete Application Form City of Eugene • 99 W. 10th Ave. . Eugene, OR 97401 • 541-682-5481 e 541-682-5 572 Fax www.eugene-o r.govlplanning WPlanning Tentative Planned Unit Development Completeness Review Form - Planning Division Application File Name Santa Clara Transit Station (PDT 19-1/ ARA 19-1)) Date: March 12, 2019 Applicant's Narne: Matt Imlach, Facilities Management Project Director, Lane Transit District Zoning: C-2/SR/PD C-1 Representative's Name: Colin McArthur, Cameron McCarthy Landscape Architecture & Planning Reviewed by: Jenessa Dragovich Phone: (541) 682-8385 E-mail: JDragovich@eugene-or.gov General - It is stated in the written statement that the entire site is C-2, however, a small portion of the site just north of Comments: the existing building currently shows as C-1. Please clarify the inconsistency and address any standards related to the use of the C-1 portion of the site. For reference, the Map/Tax Lot is 17041144/800. Please review the attached checklist from Public Works . Written Statement Submittedr Missing Incomplete N/A' 1. , Detailed written statement that, describes the proposed use of the ❑ ❑ ® ❑ property and'how the proposed planned unit'development satisfies all applicable approval criteria (Section 9.8300 - 9.8310 and 9.8320 or 9.8325 of the Eugene Code). 2. Written statement includes the names, addresses, and telephone ❑ ❑ ® ❑ numbers of the design team members, and designation of the professional coordinator for the project. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 3. Clearly states whether the application is to be reviewed under standard or Needed Housing criteria. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. Clearly states whether site is included on City's acknowledged Goal 5 inventory. (1) Written statement concerns: • Metro Plan policies F.18 and F.21 should also be addressed. • At EC 9.8325(4) it is stated that there are not significant trees on the site, however, site plan sheet L-000 shows three trees being removed. Please address the inconsistency between the plans and the written Comments statement. (2) The design team listed by EC 9.8310(2)(b) requires an arborist. Staff notes that aerial photographs shows trees near the existing structure noted as "off-site building to remain." For these trees it appears that removal is intended based on the notes on sheet L-000. Please clarify if an arborist has been involved or if a request is being made for waiver of this requirement. Required Neighborhood/Applicant Meeting per,EC9.7007'& 9.7010 Submitted Missing Incomplete ® ❑ ❑ 5. Submitted the list of persons who were mailed notice pursuant to EC 9.7007(5) &a signed statement that notice was posted & mailed to those on the list. ® ❑ ❑ 6. Submitted a copy of the notice(see EC 9.7007(5)) ® ❑ ❑ 7. Submitted a copy of the meeting notes and sign-in sheet described at EC 9.7007(9); ❑ ® ❑ 8. Submitted copy of the site plan presented at the meeting. 9. Verify if site plan submitted with application substantially conforms to site ® ❑ ❑ plan presented at neighborhood/applicant meeting (see EC 9.7007(12)). If not, new meeting is required. Comments: (8) Please submit a copy of the site plan shown at the neighborhood meeting. Tentative Planned Unit Development Completeness Review Form Page 1 of 4 Site Plan Requirements `Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 10. Date, north arrow, and standard engineer's scale are shown on the plat. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 11. Assessor's Map and Tax Lot numbers are shown on the plat. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 12. Vicinity map is shown on the plat. 13. Dimensions of the plan boundary, dimensions of proposed lots, ❑ ❑ ❑ ® approximate square footage calculations, and proposed parcel lines shown. ❑ E] El ® 14. Location of parcel lines and other layout details for future division of parcels greater than 13,500 square feet shown. ® ❑ ❑ a 15. Location of all existing and proposed structures shown. Indicated whether the existing structures will remain or be removed. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 16. Provided elevation drawings that portray the scale and appearance of proposed buildings. 17. Provided a tabulation of coverage, including the amount of area ® ❑ ❑ ❑ covered by building(s), parking, and the amount of area devoted to open space. 18. Indicated on the map and provided a supporting written statement ❑ ❑ ❑ ® addressing the solar criteria. (This applies only to land zoned R-1 and R-2) 19. Provided a cover sheet with the certification and signatures of the ❑ " ® ❑ professional coordinator and all design team members for the project. Each drawing is stamped and signed by the licensed professional responsible for preparing the plans. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 20. Width and location of all existing and proposed public and private easements shown. 21. All contiguous property under the same ownership shown. The ® ❑ ❑ ❑ application includes all contiguous undeveloped or partially developed property under the same ownership. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 22. All proposed grading for streets, building areas, and other proposed development shown. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 23. Type and size of existing or proposed fencing and/or landscape buffering shown. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 24. If applicable, phasing boundaries shown. 25. Included a phasing plan that indicates any proposed phasing for the ❑ ❑ ❑ ® development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. (19) Not all stamps have signatures. Comments Parking Area Requirements Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A ® ❑ E:] O 26. Location, number, and dimensions of existing and_proposed parking spaces, including aisle widths and disabled parking Divisionshown. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 27. Location, number, and dimensions of bicycle parking spaces, including long-term and short-term bicycle parking shown. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 28. Traffic circulation patterns, including the width of travel lanes shown. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 29. Landscaping and screening for parking areas shown. ® E ❑ ❑ 30. Means of protection for landscaped areas (i.e. curbs) shown. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 31. Location and height of all existing and proposed lighting for parking area shown. ❑ ❑ r ® ❑ 32. Designated car pool and van pool parking for developments with 20 or more employees shown. Tentative Planned Unit Development Completeness Review Form Page 2 of 4 comments (32) Please clarify if more than 20 people will be employed and if a van pool or car pool area is proposed. Street and Utility Improvement Requirements ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 33. Show that utility plans comply with Eugene Code Section 9.6775, Underground Utilities. Landscaping Requirements Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 34. Location, species, and size of existing and proposed landscaping shown. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 35. Indicates means of irrigation. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 36. Open space and landscaping proposed for open space areas shown. Tree Preservation Requirements Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A 37. Provided a tree preservation plan prepared by a certified arborist or ❑ ❑ ® ❑ approved equivalent. Included both a narrative description and a corresponding site plan to address tree preservation criterion. 38. Healthy trees that have a reasonable chance of survival considering ❑ ❑ ® ❑ the base zone or special area zone and other applicable approval criteria. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 39. Trees located within vegetated corridors and stands rather than individual isolated trees subject to windthrow. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 40. Trees that fulfill a screening fuhction, provide relief from glare;'or shade expansive areas of pavement. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 41. Trees that provide a buffer between potentially incompatible land uses. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 42. Trees located along the perimeter of the lot(s) and within building setback areas. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 43. Trees and stands of trees located along ridgelines and within view corridors. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 44. Trees with significant habitat value. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ' 45. Trees adjacent to public parks, open space and streets. ❑ . ❑ ® ❑ 46. Trees along water features ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 47. Heritage trees. From aerial photographs it appears that there are three trees near the building noted as "off-site building to remain," Sheet L-000 provides details that indicate the trees are proposed for removal, while the written Comments statement indicates that there are no significant trees on site. Please adjust the site plan, or written narrative to address the inconsistency and clarify if an arborist has been involved in determining feasibility of preservation, or if an exception to the requirement for an arborist is requested. . Natural Features-Assessme nt and Delineation of Applicable Boundaries on Site Plan Submitted; Missing Incomplete' N/A 48. Significant on-site vegetation, including rare plants (those that are ❑ ❑ ❑ ® proposed for listing or are listed under State or Federal law), and native plant communities shown. 49. All documented habitat for all rare animal species (those that are ❑ ❑ ❑ ® proposed for listing or are listed under State or Federal law) are shown. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 50. Prominent topographic features, such as ridgelines and outcrops, shown. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 51. Wetlands, intermittent and perennial stream corridors, and riparian areas shown. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 52. Natural resource areas designated in the Metro Plan diagram as " "Natural Resource and areas identified in any city-adopted natural Tentative Planned Unit Development Completeness Review Form Page 3.of 4 resource inventory shown. ❑ 0 ® 53. If disturbance to natural features, a mitigation plan was submitted, in accordance with 9.8320(4)(c). Comments' 1d Architectural Features of Proposed Buildings Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 54. Indicated general building locations, bulk and height. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 55. Indicated key architectural features of proposed buildings (concept drawings okay). ❑ ❑ ® 56. Indicated how buildings proposed on slopes will blend with natural terrain if subject to the South Hills Study. .Comments Supporting Documents Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A 57. Submitted a legal description of the property included in the ® ❑ ❑ ❑ planned unit development application. This legal description is " " white sheet of paper (no letterhead) so that typed on an 8% x 11 it is suitable for recording ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 58. Submitted a preliminary title report. 59. If application requires notification to Oregon Division of State Lands concerning potential wetland permit requirements (on Eugene LWI ® ❑ ❑ ® or WEWP Inventory Maps), notification form and related map is prepared and attached (by staff). (ORS 215.418) *Planner: for necessary forms, Click here. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 60. Submitted a Geotechnical Analysis Comments For Staff Use Only - Referral Information Yes No ❑ 1. Route'land use referral to PW stafffor'Privately Engineering Public Improvement (PEP[). ® ❑ 2. Route land use referral to Public Works Maintenance. ❑ 3. Is the right-of-way county maintained? If yes, route land use referral to Lane County Transportation and Lane County Road Maintenance Planning. ❑ ® 4, Route to Bonneville Power Administration (if site includes a BPA easement) 5. Other. Tentative Planned Unit Development Completeness Review Form Page 4 o'14 Planned Unit Development Completeness Review Form Public Works Department 0 Application File Name PDT 19-01/Santa Clara Transit Center Date: March 5, 2019 Reviewed by: Donna Stark Phone: 541-682-5105 General Tentative PUD application to create a transit station with commercial and residential uses. Concurrent ARA 19-1. Comments: Wastewater Requirements Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 1. Show location of the existing public wastewater system and flow line elevation at proposed connection point(s). ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Show existing and proposed wastewater sewer layout, including service to each lot (each lot must be connected to a public wastewater sewer). Comments: Street and Utility Improvement Requirements 'Submitted Missing In! complete N/A ❑ ® ❑ ❑ 3. Note on the plan proposed public improvements and whether they are to be constructed publicly or privately. ® ❑ ❑ 4. Note on the plat the location, size, and species of existing and proposed street trees. ® ❑ ❑ E] 5. Note on plat the location of any existing or proposed street lights. (signal light?) Comments: Water Supply Requirements Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. Include a diagram (including diameter) of existing and proposed water mains. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 7. .Show existing and proposed fire. hydrants. Comments: Contour Intervals Submitted Missing Incomplete NIA ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. Note on the plans the City Bench Mark used. ® One-foot contour intervals for ground slopes up to five percent. ❑ Two-foot contour intervals for ground slopes between five and ten percent. ❑ Five-foot contour intervals for ground slopes exceeding ten percent. Colrimeats: Storm Drainage Requirements Submitted Missing Incomplete NiA ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 9. Delineate the Special Flood Hazard Area. (41039C 1107F) 10. Delineate the tops-of-banks of all open waterways on and adjacent to the ❑ ❑ ❑ ® property and describe extent of impacts and/or relocation work due to proposed development request. 11. Show existing and proposed flood control facilities, including collection, ® ❑ ❑ ❑ conveyance,.and treatment of stormwater in compliance with SW Management Manual, within and adjacent to development site. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 12. Show location of the existing piped public system and flow line elevation at proposed connection point(s). 13. Application proposes no construction of public or private streets or shared ❑ ❑ ❑ ® driveways; provide a site development plan that delineates infiltration rates, bedrock, groundwater elevations, and ground slopes. Planned Unit Development Completeness Review Form Revised 6/2015 Page 1 of 4 14. Application proposes construction of public streets; provide stormwater treatment plan for public streets based on infiltration, filtration, or ® ❑ ❑ ❑ mechanical priority and include sizing calculations that demonstrate whether treatment of runoff from adjoining lots will be on-site or in public infiltration or filtration facility in the right of way. 15. Application proposes construction of private street(s) and/or shared driveway(s); provide stormwater treatment plan for private street(s) and ❑ ❑ ❑ ® shared driveway(s) based on infiltration and filtration priority and include sizing calculations that demonstrate whether treatment of runoff from adjoining lots will be on-site or in private shared facility. 16. Application (CUP/SR/PUD) includes impervious surface area to be ® ❑ ❑ ❑ constructed with a future development permit; provide stormwater treatment plan and analysis for runoff from impervious surface area based on infiltration, filtration or payment priority. 17. If applicable, identify flow control by demonstrating how there is no ❑ ❑ ❑ ® increase in flow rates or volumes if contributing to a Headwaters Area waterway, per EC 9.6793(3)(a). ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 18. Submit three copies of stormwater analysis that demonstrate compliance with stormwater drainage provisions at EC 9.6790 - 9.6795. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 19. If adjustment request includes Stormwater Quality/Flow Control, an approved alternative design was submitted. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 20. If adjustment request includes Source Control, a DAR form was submitted. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 21. The applicant has submitted approval from Lane County for proposed stormwater discharge to Lane County systems. -Comments: Geotechnical"Report Requirements Submitted Missing/ Incomplete / / Inconsistent _ Unsupported N/A - The applicant's analysis must address EC 9.6710 and AO 58-02-25-F. Complete Data Data 22. Level 1 Geotechnical Analysis has been submitted because the development includes public improvements or has site slopes between 5 and 10 percent. The report includes: required record ® ❑ ❑ data; a description of the development and property;a specific statement regarding the absence or presence of unstable soils; and concludes that the site is suitable for the proposed development without further investigation or recommendations. Level 3 is required ifspecific recommendations are necessary 23. Level 2 Geotechnical Analysis has been submitted because the development includes public improvements and has site slopes' equal to or greater than 10%. The report includes: all of the Level ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ L information above; test pit locations consistent with the interval requirements in Exhibit A of AO 58-02-25-F; and test pit results are profiled and show soil classifications and ground water elevation. Conclusion must also be per Level 1; if not, a Level 3 is required. 24. Level 3 Geotechnical Analysis has been submitted because either of the required Level 1 or Level 2 reports identified potential stability issues that necessitate design-specific geotechnical recommendations. The report includes: all of the requirements of Levels 1 and 2 above; design recommendations for structures, ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ foundations, compacted fill, cut/fill lines, earthwork, and streets; mitigation measures for seismic hazards, landslides, and constraints that cannot be removed; construction measures for backfill, compaction, drainage, weather limitations, access across slope easements; inspection requirements during and following construction; and graphical representation of slope easements and design details for foundations and structures. Comments: Hazardous Materials Review Yes No Planned Unit Development Completeness Review Form Revised 6/2015 Page 2 of 4 ❑ ® 25. Is a Hazardous Materials Review application required? Comments: Street and.Public Access Way Requirements Submitted' -Missing Incomplete N/A 26. Identify the number of peak hour trips based on the likely development that will occur on all lots resulting from the land division. If the ® ❑ ❑ ❑ development will generate 100 or more trips during any peak hour, a Traffic Impact Analysis Review is required in accordance with 9.8650 - 9.8680. ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 27. Show street names for all existing and proposed streets (public and private) and identify the street classification. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 28. Indicate potential slope easements. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 29. Delineate any street segments where grade exceeds 15% percent, where driveways are prohibited. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 30. Provide a street center profile using ground elevations of proposed streets at or exceeding 15% grade. 31. Show location and widths (right-of-way and paving width) of all existing ❑ ❑ ® ❑ and proposed streets, intersections, and bike and pedestrian access ways, both within the plat and adjacent to the lat. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 32. Show-existing and proposed curbs and-sidewalks on site and adjacent to property involved. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 33. Address EC 9.6815 Street Connectivity and provide supporting narrative or if re uestin an exception, provide justifications. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 34. Show that the proposal is consistent with Eugene Code Section 9.6780, Vision Clearance Area. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 35. Indicate radii of all street curves on the plans. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 36. Show location and type of existing and proposed transit-related facilities. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 37. Show existing and proposed special setbacks, in accordance with Eugene Code Section 9.6750. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 38. Submit an Alternative Traffic Safety Study (ATSS) if an adjustment is request d to the required internal vehicle stacking at EC 9.6703(3)(a). ® El ❑ ❑ 39. Show all existing access driveways to the property. ❑ ® ❑ 40. Demonstrate that access to the development site is located in accordance with EC 7.420. 41. Submit an ATSS (or address in written statement) if requesting more than ❑ ® ❑ ❑ one access connection for a single development site and/or requesting that an access connection be wider than 20 feet. , ,,,.ati ; . 1 l d raft : erdanee •°4 EG 42 d t i ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ e n -ne u e e f pe es r an . 9-6738. 27 - Proposed street name for N/S Connector Road? 31-Address how Table 9.6870 is met, include ROW width, paving width (curb to curb), for the proposed Comments' classification of the new street. 40/41- The site is currently undeveloped, and is subject to EC 9.6735(2)/EC 7.420. Please address in written statement. 42 - Per planning review: For Staff Use Only - Referral Inf6rmation Yes No ❑ 43. Does Parks Planning require a referral for this application? Yes, if j acent to a city ark. property is one acre or larger and ad 44. Is the right-of-way under Lane County jurisdiction? If yes, route land ❑ ® use referral to Lane County Transportation and Lane County Road Maintenance Planning. ® 45. Is a referral to PWM or PEPI required? Yes, if there are public improvements. 46. Does stormwater discharge to a facility' within Junction City Water ❑ Control District? If yes, route land use referral to Junction City Water Control District, Attn: Steve Cornacchia. Planned Unit Development Completeness Review Form Revised 6/2015 Page 3 of 4 AM qwPlanning Atrium Building 99 West 101" Avenue Eugene, Oregon 97401 Phone: 541-682-5377 Fax: 541-682-5572 www.eugene-or.gov/planning Incomplete Land Use Application Form- 180 Day Completeness Review Process Eugene Planning Division Attn: Jenessa Dragovich File Santa Clara Transit Station (PDT 19-1/ ARA 19-1) 99 West 10th Avenue Eugene, OR 97401 FAX- (541) 682-5572 Completeness Review Step (Check ONE box) ❑ I intend to submit all of the missing or incomplete materials as identified by the City in completeness review. I understand that according to State law I have up to 180 days from the date the application was submitted to provide the missing.or incomplete materials and that after that date, if I have not submitted the missing information, my application will be void. I also hereby agree to allow the City a reasonable period of time for a review and determination of completeness upon submittal of the missing or incomplete materials and the required number of copies. ❑ I intend to submit some, but not all, of the missing or incomplete materials as identified by the City in completeness review. I understand that according to State law I have up to 180 days from the date the application was submitted to provide the missing or incomplete materials that I intend to submit and that after that date, if I have not submitted the missing information, my application will be void. I also hereby agree to allow the City a'reasonable period of time for a review and determination of completeness, upon submittal of the missing or incomplete materials and the required number of copies. The materials I do not intend to submit are those items I have listed on the lines below (attach additional sheets if necessary). ❑ I do not intend to submit any of the missing or incomplete materials as identified by the City in the completeness review. I understand that the City will proceed with review of the application materials previously submitted. I also understand that incomplete applications may not provide adequate evidence to demonstrate compliance with applicable criterika and standards. Please deem my .application complete as of the date this form is received by the City of Eugene Planning Division. Printed Name of Applicant or Applicant's Representative Signature of Applicant or Applicant's Representative Date