My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Newspaper Articles
>
OnTrack
>
CU
>
2018
>
CU 18-1
>
Newspaper Articles
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2018 9:36:22 AM
Creation date
10/4/2018 9:36:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CU
File Year
18
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
U O North Campus
Document Type
Misc.
Document_Date
10/3/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City, public need more details on UO project <br />Eugene residents made a good point last week about the University of OregonÈs planned north <br />campus development: The UO has provided too few specifics about the project. ItÈs no wonder that <br />the project received a frosty reception from many of the people attending a public hearing before a <br />Eugene hearings officer. <br />The area along the Willamette River needs to be redeveloped, but it needs to be done in a <br />responsible manner. The plan currently envisioned by the UO might be the right approach, but itÈs <br />difficult to tell. The explanations given by UO officials were aspirational for what might happen <br />over the next 30 years. <br />To state the obvious, 30 years is a long time. The community and the university will have changed <br />in ways that cannot be precisely forecast. It is understandable that university officials want <br />flexibility in how they approach the phased project. But many of those UO staff members will leave <br />the university during the next 30 years. Unless locked in, the aspirations and commitments made <br />today might not hold up tomorrow. <br />The university is seeking the cityÈs approval for a conditional use permit for 77 acres north of <br />Franklin Boulevard, an area currently occupied by university buildings and sports fields. <br />The project has the potential to increase student and community interactions with the Willamette <br />River. The UO has pledged to restore the riverfront, but community members fear the proposed <br />artificial turf fields might leach substances that could harm wildlife habitat and the river. University <br />officials said a 200-foot buffer would exist between the river and any development, keeping any <br />potentially harmful materials from the river. <br />The assurances are helpful. But again, there are insufficient details to know for sure. In any project, <br />itÈs as important to acknowledge what could go wrong as it is to include what would go right. <br />There is a reason that MurphyÈs law Ä popularly cited as ÅAnything that can go wrong will go <br />wrongÆ Ä has endured across the ages. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.