<br /> <br />August 22, 2018 <br />Nicholas Gioello <br />Planning and Development Department <br />City of Eugene <br />th <br />99 W 10 Avenue <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />RE: North Campus Conditional Use Permit (CU 18-1 WG 18-12) <br />Project Area Calculations <br />Dear Nick, <br />Please accept this letter as supplemental information clarifying the project area and tax lot area <br />acreage calculations referenced in the North Campus Conditional Use and Willamette <br />Greenway Permit (CU 18-1 WG 18-2)narrative. The final narrative dated June 22, 2018, pages <br />6, 7 and Table 6-1 contained notional errors that have since been corrected. These corrections <br />are as follows: <br />The AssessorÈs Map reference for tax lot 00300 on pages 6, 7 and Table 6-1 was <br />inconsistent. This tax lot is associated with AssessorÈs Map 17-03-32-21. Pages 6, 7 <br />and Table 6-1 have been corrected. <br /> <br />The AssessorÈs Map reference for tax lot 05300 on pages 6, 7 and Table 6-1 was <br />inconsistent. This tax lot is associated with AssessorÈs Map 17-03-32-24. Pages 6, 7 <br />and Table 6-1 have been corrected. <br />Table 6-1 omitted two tax lots within the project area due to an incorrect base data file. <br />These tax lots are 17-03-32-24-05400 (7.91 acres) and 17-03-32-24-05500 (2.50 acres). <br />Theacreage associated with these tax lots was included in the total project area <br />calculation. The total project area acreage calculation is based on the project area <br />boundary, which is not affected by the corrections, thus total project area acreage is <br />unchanged (77.4 acres). The addition of tax lots 05400 and 05500 is simply notional to <br />the narrative, and not mathematical. <br /> <br />It is also important to note that the project area boundary, which is synonymous with the S-RP <br />zone boundary, and the parcel file (i.e. tax lot boundaries) are based on original GIS shapefiles <br />converted to AutoCAD drawing format. The files used for the analysis are not completely <br />coterminous with each other, resulting in minor discrepancies between the gross acreage <br />provided by the Lane County Regional Land Information Database (RLID) and the net acreage <br />calculated using AutoCAD for each tax lot within the project area, as illustrated on Sheet L06 <br />Tax Lots. <br />Cameron McCarthy 1 <br /> <br />