My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1st Open Record Period: Staff Memos with attachments
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
1st Open Record Period: Staff Memos with attachments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2018 12:35:23 PM
Creation date
3/22/2018 12:35:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Staff Communication
Document_Date
3/21/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br />Memorandum <br /> <br />Date: March 21, 2018 <br /> <br />To: Virginia Gustafson Lucker, Eugene Hearings Official <br /> <br />From: Nicholas Gioello, Associate Planner, Eugene Planning Division <br /> <br />Subject: Open Record Memo for Capital Hill PUD (PDT 17-1) <br />___________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />In accordance with the open record period established following the public hearing held on March 7, <br />2018, staff provides the following information in response to a request by Bill Kloos, Attorney for the <br />applicant. At the hearing, he requested clarification from staff on how the proposal can be <br />developed with two additional units under Needed Housing code provisions as referenced in the <br />initial Staff Report (see page 5). He also requested confirmation that the PUD site is identified as a <br />Goal 5 area and depicted on the Scenic Areas map (Figure H 2). <br />provided below. <br /> <br />March 3, 2017), a letter was submitted by the <br /> In this letter it is asserted that: <br /> <br /> <br />objective. <br />Under the Needed Housing track, the code prohibits any grading on slopes of 20% or steeper. <br /> <br />Under the Needed Housing track, the code limits development above the 900-foot elevation <br /> <br />to just one dwelling unit on any legal lot that existed on August 1, 2001, per EC 9.8325(12)(a). <br />The area above the 900-foot contour may not be subdivided for housing. <br /> <br />He also states the following: <br /> <br />The applicant requests a determination from the Hearing Official that, by direct operation of <br />the statute, the City is prohibited from applying any standards that are not clear and <br />objective. This statutory prohibition applies to the full range of standards listed under the <br />General standards track in EC 9.8320. <br /> <br />ressed it in the initial February 2018 Staff Report as <br />follows: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.