My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUBLIC COMMENTS (as of 8-8-17)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
PUBLIC COMMENTS (as of 8-8-17)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/8/2017 10:16:22 AM
Creation date
8/8/2017 10:16:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
8/8/2017
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />BROWN Daren M <br />From:Susan Hoffman <shortgamesue@yahoo.com> <br />Sent:Monday, July 31, 2017 6:32 PM <br />To:GIOELLO Nick R <br />Cc:Susan Hoffman <br />Subject:Capital Hill PUD - Questions <br />Hi Nick. I am a concerned Eugene citizen and live on Spring Blvd. just a few blocks from this <br />proposed residential project. By way of background, I am retired now but through out my 30+ <br />year career worked for various California & Nevada banks (Wells, US Bank, Bank of the West, <br />etc.) financing large commercial, industrial and residential projects. Residential projects were <br />both single family detached and condominiums, with unit totals from a few dozen to as many as <br />several hundred. I have been going through the Tentative Application documents on your <br />website regarding the proposed Capital Hill PUD project and there are several issues about <br />which I have questions. What is your preferred method for discussing these issues?? Phone <br />call?? Short meeting in your office?? By e-mail?? Issues include: <br />Lack of draft CC&Rs going into the approval process. (I also assume there are no draft <br />Rules/Regulations at this point.) I realize that this developer is only preparing the finished lots <br />for sale and is not going to be involved with the vertical construction; however, as you know, <br />CC&Rs can be critical in shaping the physical footprint of the project. They also insure the <br />financial viability of the project (HOA budget, special assessments, maintenance of the open <br />space, private road, etc.) and provide parameters for community living (regulations on <br />maintenance of homes & yards, noise, home offices, storage, Airbnb, guest parking, etc.). If the <br />project's site development is approved and goes forward, at what point will CC&Rs be <br />drafted?? What happens if, after site development commences, the developer and the city <br />cannot agree on the format of CC&Rs? Why not address this going in?? <br />How will the potential for "single family attached" housing be handled?If a lot purchaser <br />decides to build a 2 or 3 unit dwelling, will those units be further broken down into separate tax <br />lots and sold separately after construction or is it assumed that they will be rentals and that the <br />lot purchaser will be responsible for compliance with the city's requirements for multi-family units <br />and his/her tenants' compliance with the CC&Rs, community rules & regs, etc.? <br />Division of responsibility of the open space between the HOA and individual homeowners. What <br />is driving this bifurcation?? With whom will the final responsibility rest if open space is polluted <br />or otherwise in need of maintenance?? Especially for space at the east edge of lots that abut <br />the Ribbon Trail. Will lot purchasers actually take title to this "open" space?? <br />As far as I know, no (potential) elevations have been provided giving interested parties some <br />insight as to the visual impact of 30' foot structures, 6 foot high fences, etc. which could <br />potentially be allowed under the city's R-1 code. How will the project control architectural style, <br />siding color, roof material, etc. so that there is some design uniformity? <br />Guest parking. None? <br />1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.