My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Staff Open Record Memo
>
OnTrack
>
TIA
>
2016
>
TIA 16-7
>
Staff Open Record Memo
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/26/2017 12:33:50 PM
Creation date
3/9/2017 9:42:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
TIA
File Year
16
File Sequence Number
7
Application Name
Amazon Corner
Document Type
Public Comments submitted after hearings official hearing
Document_Date
3/8/2017
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
A ftM I <br />WPIanning <br />99 west 10`h Avenue <br />Eugene, Oregon 97401 <br />Phone: S41-682-S377 <br />Fax: S41-682-5572 <br />www.eugene-or.gov/planning <br />Memorandum <br />Date: March 8, 2017 <br />To: Fred Wilson, Eugene Hearings Official <br />From: Erik Berg-Johansen, Associate Planner, City of Eugene Planning Division <br />Scott Gillespie, Development Review Manager, Public Works Engineering <br />Subject: Amazon Corner TIA Appeal (TIA 16-7) - Open Record Staff Memo <br />Background <br />Before the public hearing on March 1, 2017, both the applicant and appellant submitted new <br />evidence and testimony regarding the subject appeal case; these materials were provided to <br />the Hearings Official (HO) before the hearing. At the public hearing the applicant and appellant <br />gave oral presentations regarding the merit of the applicant's Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). <br />Other members of the public also testified at the hearing to state their position on the project <br />and to provide comments and testimony. <br />Staff appreciated the number of residents who took time out of their evening to attend the <br />public hearing. Hearing different perspectives from our community members is extremely <br />informative and is a key part of the public process. Important concerns were brought up at the <br />hearing, and the intent of this memo is for staff to provide a response to some of these issues. <br />The Meaning of "Accommodate" <br />The Hearings Official requested that staff clarify the meaning of "accommodate" where it exists <br />in the Purpose Statement for Traffic Impact Analysis applications (See EC 9.8650): <br />The purpose of Traffic Impact Analysis Review is to ensure that developments which will <br />generate a significant amount of traffic, cause an increase in traffic that will contribute to <br />traffic problems in the area, or result in levels of service of the roadway system in the vicinity <br />of the development that do not meet adopted level of service standards provide the facilities <br />necessary to accommodate the traffic impact of the proposed development. <br />At the hearing, staff explained that Level of Service (LOS), or traffic "mobility" 1, is an objective <br />measure of traffic accommodation. If a street is operating at LOS A, it's safe to say that it is <br />1 LOS is a performance measure for mobility. Mobility is the relative ability of citizens to travel regionally. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.