My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Testimony Rec'd at Plng Comm Appeal PH 10-20-2015 Exhibit #2
>
OnTrack
>
Z
>
2015
>
Z 15-5
>
Testimony Rec'd at Plng Comm Appeal PH 10-20-2015 Exhibit #2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/22/2015 4:02:15 PM
Creation date
10/21/2015 11:59:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
Z
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
5
Application Name
LAUREL RIDGE
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
10/20/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Received in Public Hearing <br />City of Eugene Planning & Development <br />OCT 20 2015 <br />Exhibit D -File Z l S' <br />Exhibit Z <br />FINDINGS IN SUPPORT OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EUGENE- <br />SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN (METRO PLAN) TO <br />ADOPT AS PART OF PERIODIC REVIEW METRO PLAN HOUSEKEEPING <br />REVISIONS, A NEW METRO PLAN CHAPTER III-C: ENVIRONMENTAL <br />RESOURCES ELEMENT, A NEW METRO PLAN DIAGRAM; AND ADOPTING <br />SAVINGS AND SEVERABILITY CLAUSES. <br />The following criteria from Springfield Development Code 7.070(3), Eugene Code 9.7730(3), <br />and Lane Code 12.225(2) shall be applied by the elected officials in approving or denying an <br />amendment to the Metro Plan: <br />(a) The amendment must be consistent with the relevant statewide planning goals <br />adopted by the Land Conservation and Development Commission; and <br />(b) Adoption of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. <br />The Eugene and Springfield City Councils and the Lane County Board of Commissioners make <br />the following findings with respect to the criteria set forth in Eugene Code Section 9.7730(3) and <br />Springfield Development Code 7.070(3), and Lane Code 12.225(2): <br />The following information, analysis, reports, minutes and materials are included along with other <br />material, in the record of this proceeding. While this supporting background material may not all <br />be specifically mentioned or referenced in the findings, they provide most of the factual basis for <br />these findings. <br />1. February 10, 2004 minutes and staff notes of the Joint Work Session and Public Hearing <br />of the Eugene and Springfield City Councils and Lane County Board of Commissioners; <br />and minutes and staff notes of the May 17, 2004 Springfield City Council, April 21, 2004 <br />Eugene City Council, and June 2, 2004 Lane County Board of Commissioners. <br />2. Testimony submitted for the February 10, 2004 Public Hearing of the Eugene and <br />Springfield City Councils and Lane County Board of Commissioners; <br />3. September 23, 2003 Planning Commission Joint Work Session and June 3, 2003 and June <br />17, 2003 Joint Public Hearing staff notes and minutes; and staff notes and minutes for the <br />Eugene Planning Commission, November 3, 2003, Springfield Planning Commission, <br />November 4, 2003, and Lane County Planning Commission, November 18, 2003. <br />Exhibit D: Findings in Support of Adopting Ordinance for the Eugene-Springfield Page 1 of 15 <br />Metropolitan Plan (Metro Plan) Housekeeping Revisions, Metro Plan Chapter III-C, <br />and the Metro Plan Diagram. 224 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.