Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPublic Comment - received after hearingJANISCH Amy C Subject:FW: AT&T cell site at CrossFire From: NYSTROM Steven A Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 10:36 AM To: BRECKENRIDGE Jaime Cc: FLOCK Gabriel; GIOELLO Nick R Subject: RE: AT&T cell site at CrossFire Thanks Jamie. Nick, feel free to include in this first round of record extensions. Steve From: BRECKENRIDGE Jaime [mailto:Jaime.Breckenridge@eweb.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2015 9:55 AM To: NYSTROM Steven A Subject: RE: AT&T cell site at CrossFire Hi Steve, I’m sorry I am just now replying to this email. I’ve been transparent with AT&T during this whole process as well and have no concerns with submitting the email below in the record. Thank you for checking. Jaime From: NYSTROM Steven A [mailto:Steven.A.Nystrom@ci.eugene.or.us] Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 10:13 AM To: BRECKENRIDGE Jaime Cc: FLOCK Gabriel Subject: FW: AT&T cell site at CrossFire Jamie, thanks for the email yesterday. Long night at the hearing, but I wanted to let you know that the record was left open (which means new testimony can still be submitted). We’re considering submitting your email below, especially given that it doesn’t match what AT&T was saying last night. Any concerns with that? Steve From: FLOCK Gabriel Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 9:23 AM To: GIOELLO Nick R; NYSTROM Steven A Subject: RE: AT&T cell site at CrossFire Is this something we want in the record? From: GIOELLO Nick R Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:46 PM To: FLOCK Gabriel Subject: FW: AT&T cell site at CrossFire FYI From: BRECKENRIDGE Jaime [mailto:Jaime.Breckenridge@eweb.org] Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:44 PM To: GIOELLO Nick R; NYSTROM Steven A 1 Cc: BRECKENRIDGE Jaime Subject: AT&T cell site at CrossFire Hello Nick and Steve, I just got off the phone with Ken Lyons from AT&T regarding the Crossfire site. He won’t be at the hearing this evening but he is trying to get some information together for it. Mostly we went over the following:  4 different site acquisition people involved- perhaps there was a disconnect during transition  he wanted to clarify that there might be an opportunity to co-locate on a utility pole (both at Fox Hollow & Dillard and then on distribution poles on E. Amazon)  went over EWEB’s standard  asked if EWEB had approved any cell antennas over the last few years since they started work at this site there was reference to the fact that the site had started prior to EWEB creating a standard AND the City of o Eugene’s Telecommunication Facilities in the Right-of-Way Policy Guidelines  asked if it was EWEB or the City of Eugene that was potentially holding up antennas from moving forward Just so you know, the last bullet was a red flag for me. My response was that EWEB has had several initial site reviews over the last 2 years wherein the last correspondence on those sites were after you’ve gone through the initial review/approval with the City your next steps with EWEB would be to submit an application. EWEB has received no applications. I also let Ken know that more recently EWEB had received site requests that ended up being suspended indefinitely per AT&T. He acknowledged that happened due to AT&T purchasing another company. I really just want to be transparent with you, especially during this sensitive time. Please let me know how the meeting goes tonight. Thanks! Best regards, Jaime Breckenridge | Utility Joint Use Coordinator | Eugene Water & Electric Board 4200 Roosevelt Blvd | Eugene, OR 97402 | Ph & Fax 541.685.7388 | www.eweb.org   Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the individual and entity to whom it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged and confidential and/or protected from disclosure under Oregon Public Records Statute (ORS 192). If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified the any viewing, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication and/or attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to this e-mail and delete the message and any attachments. Thank you for your cooperation. 2