AM <br />WPlanning <br />April 3, 2015 <br />Jacob Finney, Project Manager <br />Technology Associates <br />7117 SW Beveland Street, Ste 101 <br />Tigard, OR 97223 <br />RE: Cingular Wireless at Crossfire Church (CU 14-3) <br />Dear Jacob: <br />Atrium <br />Building <br />99 west 101' Avenue <br />Eugene, Oregon 97401 <br />Phone: 541-682-5377 <br />Fax: 541-682-5572 <br />www.eugene-or.gov/planning <br />I am writing in response to your Conditional Use Permit application for a new wireless <br />telecommunication facility on behalf of New Cingular Wireless, PCS, LLC (AT&T) and the <br />property owner. Staff has reviewed your recent submitted materials, which were received by <br />our office on March 27, 2015. <br />At this time, we are willing to accept the application and subsequent materials as complete. <br />Within the next few weeks a public hearing will be scheduled to occur within 60 days. I will <br />advise you of that date a soon as possible. We will be forwarding your materials to several <br />outside expert review consultants. You will be invoiced for the cost of the city to retain such <br />consultant services per EC9.5750 (11). <br />Staff still has concerns with several areas of your application, which needs to be addressed as <br />follows: <br />• The photo simulations do not provide enough details to visualize the tower as it will <br />exist when constructed. Is it possible to supply a photograph of the proposed monopine <br />as it exists in another location? Staff is assuming that the applicant will be using a <br />company that has fabricated other similar antenna support structures. Can the name of <br />the company be supplied to staff? It is important for the hearing officer, staff and the <br />public to be able to see accurate photo details that show the monopine and how much <br />of the antenna array will be visible through the branches, in order to assess how the <br />monopine will look once constructed. <br />• In the letter addressed to you from Assistant Planner, Becky Taylor (dated November 4, <br />2014), several references were made that more clarification was needed regarding the <br />issue of noise from the generators. Your response letter (dated March 26, 2015), <br />