<br />September 26, 2013 <br />Becky Taylor, Associate Planner <br />City of Eugene Planning <br />th <br />99 West 10Avenue <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />Re: Citizen Comment Document Regarding the Oakleigh MeadowsTentative <br />Planned Unit Development (PDT 13-0001), Willamette Greenway Permit (WG 13- <br />0001) <br />Iobject to the proposed PUD for the reasons stated in the Commentsof Lauren <br />Regan and Bryn Thoms,and all additional objections incorporated by reference <br />into that Comment. <br />I was present that summer of 2010 when the co-housing idea was introduced to the <br />local homeowners. I thought it was aninteresting idea, having eight(8)individual <br />living quarters combined with a common garden, kitchen and laundry facility. I <br />was not in favor of the project because it seemed to me to be nothing more than a <br />communeand inappropriate in an urbanlocation.Additionally, having that type of <br />high occupancy housing at the end of Oakleigh Lanewould not be harmoniousto <br />the neighborhood. Three years have gone by with virtually no information about <br />this proposal. Now the project has re-surfaced and has been increased from eight <br />(8) units to twenty-eight (28) units. It is obviousthat the co-housing idea has gone <br />out the window, and now what we have is nothing more than a huge condominium <br />project, known as Oakleigh Meadows. This project does not belong here. <br />Thank you for your attention, <br />Hal G. Stedman <br />th <br />1978 N 165Drive <br />Goodyear, AZ 85395 <br /> <br />