My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
HE-64 Shawn Johnson
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
HE-64 Shawn Johnson
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:37 PM
Creation date
11/27/2013 1:06:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
11/27/2013
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />TO: Hearings Official <br />RE: Opposition to OMC Size <br />My name is Shawn Johnson and I have owned my home on Oakleigh Lane for almost 10 years. I would <br />like to voice my concern and opposition to the Oakleigh Meadow Co-Housing development as currently <br />proposed. <br />The initial discussions regarding the development of Oakleigh Meadow 3 years ago started very positive <br />as the planners did involve the local neighborhood and shared their vision of a small, communal type of <br />living development. When the land was purchased there were several work parties to clean up the land, <br />some of which I attended. We pulled blackberries, rusted equipment, and a variety of nasty trash out of <br />the site resulting in the meadow as it stands today. There was an initial kick off meeting/potluck for the <br />neighbors where information was shared and a question board was posted. Email addresses were also <br />collected to encourage communication. I shared my concerns regarding street development, traffic and <br />providing utilities to the site. My primary concern at that time was regarding how the construction <br />traffic would be accommodated during the construction phase as that would be the peak volume for the <br />7-10 unit development as presented. <br />Fast forward two years and to my surprise we are nearing the land use change request hearing. The <br />initial plan of a small cohousing development seems to have been abandoned in favor of a large condo <br />complex. In reviewing the developer’s website it appears there have been several iterations of the plan <br />none of which have been directly communicated to me. I frequent the meadow often when walking my <br />dog to the bike path and aside from the welcome sign, there was no additional information regarding the <br />phase, scope or design of the development until just recently. It saddens me that the project has <br />evolved from a small unique housing development to a full-scale condominium complex which seems to <br />be completely against the philosophy initially presented by the developers. I understand that you must <br />involve yourself to be informed in matters such as this but previously the developers were walking door <br />to door and communicating their plan. Once concern was expressed the communication directly with <br />the neighbors stopped. <br />At this point I have several concerns with the plan as presented in design A1.1: <br />Street traffic <br />More than doubling the number of homes (current proposal is 29) will result in an <br />extremely significant increase in traffic volume. <br />Oakleigh Lane – River Road intersection congestion <br />As it stands today, during peak traffic hours there are occasional lines to get from <br />Oakleigh Lane onto River Road as well as from River Road onto Oakleigh Lane or into the Burrito <br />Boy/River Road Second Hand parking lot. These lines can extend up to three cars or more in my <br />experience resulting in significant hazards to car, bicycle and pedestrian traffic. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.