August 22, 2017 <br />Nicholas Gioello <br />City of Eugene <br />Planning and Development <br />99 W 10th Avenue <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />RE: Capital Hill PUD <br />PDT 17-3 <br />Nick: <br />Thank you again for your thorough review of the project. The following are the responses to the <br />Completeness Review items. The City items are in regular typeface and our responses are in italics. <br />PLANNING <br />Comments <br />• Two (and possibly three) lots identified as potential lots for attached single-family homes appear to <br />be located with the Fairmount Neighbors boundary (see attached Map). Attached housing in the R-1 <br />zone on the same lot is defined as either duplex or triplex. Please refer to EC 9.2741 Special Use <br />Limitations for Table 9.2740, which clearly prohibits duplexes and triplexes within the City defined <br />boundary of the Fairmount Neighbors. <br />After reviewing the boundary map with respect to the Site Plan we obtained the GIS data layer that <br />locates that boundary line on our Site Plan. It is clear that Lots 6 and Lots 19 are almost fully <br />contained within that boundary. As such these lots have been revised. Lot 6 has been divided into 2 <br />single family lots. Lot 33 will contain the existing 3 unit apartment building. A portion of Lot 17 is <br />contained within the Fairmount Neighbors boundary and as such the eastern portion of the lot <br />(contained in the Laurel Hill Valley neighborhood) will be the only part of the lot designated for <br />development of single family attached homes. <br />The GIS layer was inserted into the ACAD base file and lined up with as many property lines as <br />possible. We did not attempt to line the neighborhood boundary line up with tax lots but rather line up <br />surveyed property lines with GIS tax lot lines. It goes without saying that these did not line up well. <br />We decided to match up the eastern most boundary of our site with corresponding tax lot line on the <br />GIS data base. This gave us the longest contiguous piece of data that matched. <br />• Page 9 of the written narrative indicates bike parking for Lots 7, 18 and 24. Is this in reference to the <br />old plan set? There is not lot 34 in the new plan set. Is the reference to the bike parking related to the <br />attached housing? <br />Thanks for catching this. Apparently the second time through a few details were missed in terms of <br />lot numbers. This has been revised in the written statement. The only bike parking reference is now <br />for the only lot that could potentially be built with a multi-family unit. Since there are no plans <br />currently for that lot the statement simply serves to assure staff that this item can be reviewed at time <br />of building permit should the developer of the lot choose to develop with a multi-family unit. This is <br />currently Lot 17 in the revised Site Plan submitted with this response. <br />• There seems to be some confusion and discrepancy regarding several boundaries <br />referenced in the narrative. Please review the following, the first 3 maps were <br />generated from our GIS data, the fourth map is codified in the Eugene Code: <br />➢ South Hills Plan boundary ➢ Laurel Hill Plan boundary + LANDSCAPE 59 <br />ARCHITECTS t <br />375 West 4th, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 SCHIRMER <br />PLANNERS + LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS + ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS Phone: 541.686.4540 Fax: 541.686.4577 <br />www.schirmersatre.com = <br />