My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Application Materials
>
OnTrack
>
ST
>
2026
>
ST 26-04
>
Application Materials
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/20/2026 11:27:03 AM
Creation date
7/20/2026 10:37:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
ST
File Year
26
File Sequence Number
4
Application Name
Graham Place
Document Type
Application Materials
Document_Date
7/17/2026
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
259
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Graham Place Subdivision Stormwater Report July 2026 <br />PAGE 2 OF 6 <br /> <br />soils infiltrate at a rate less than 2 in/hr. Therefore, infiltration is not proposed to be an outlet option for <br />stormwater discharge on site. For more information, refer to Core Geoengineering’s geotechnical report within <br />this report’s Appendix. <br /> <br />The static groundwater depth ranges from 23 ft – 40 ft bgs based on local well log data as stated in the <br />geotechnical report. The rain garden’s open storage bottom is roughly 4 ft below bgs. If groundwater is <br />encountered during construction of the storm facility, the facility’s design will be updated to include an <br />impermeable liner for groundwater to not surcharge up through the facility. <br /> <br />Site topography indicates minimal slope from the south side of Basin #4 to the north side of Basin #1. The <br />property is 1.420 acres; however, the proposed development area draining to the storm facility is only 1.199 <br />acres. See the attached basin map at the end of this report for more information on basin locations. Given the <br />0 in/hr measured infiltration rate, the existing conditions were modeled with an HSG D classification even <br />though there were multiple hydrologic soil groups present on site per Web Soil Survey. Below is a table <br />summarizing the parameters used for analyzing the existing condition: <br /> <br />Table 1: Existing Site Physical Characteristics. <br />Land Type & Description Total Acreage Curve Number TC (mins) <br />Brush, Fair, HSG D 0.992 77 <br />13.1 Unconnected roofs, HSG D 0.057 98 <br />Paved parking, HSG D 0.122 98 <br /> <br />The time of concentration above comes from NRCS equation 15-9 (below) for maximum sheet flow lengths of <br />less than 100 feet and greater than 0.10 ft flow depths: <br /> <br />𝒍=𝟎𝟎𝟎√𝑺 <br />𝒏 <br /> <br /> where: <br /> n = Manning’s roughness coefficient <br /> l = limiting length of flow (ft) <br /> S = slope (ft/ft) <br /> <br />Using the equation above while assuming a grassed flow surface and an ambient slope of 1.40% along the <br />longest water path, the resulting maximum sheet flow length is 29 ft, which gives a time of concentration of 9.5 <br />minutes. Using the same land slope, a velocity factor of 7.0 ft/sec for short grass pastures, and a resulting flow <br />length of 181 ft on the same flow path as used before, the additional time of concentration through shallow <br />concentrated flow is 3.6 minutes. Together these values add to 13.1 minutes total. <br /> <br />Post Construction <br />To work with the proposed site layout and existing grading, it is proposed to route stormwater runoff from <br />basins #1 - 4 into the proposed filtration rain garden. The facility is designed to provide adequate storage for
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.