My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Application Materials
>
OnTrack
>
ST
>
2026
>
ST 26-02
>
Application Materials
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2026 3:30:42 PM
Creation date
5/19/2026 10:38:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
ST
File Year
26
File Sequence Number
2
Application Name
Floral Hill Terrace
Document Type
Application Materials
Document_Date
5/15/2026
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
102
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />15 <br /> <br />certerra.com 4660 Main Street, Suite 100, Springfield, Oregon 97478 T: 541.393.6340 <br />2.4 Seismicity <br /> <br />In accordance with Section 20.3 of ASCE 7 -22, the Site Class was determined by estimating an equivalent <br />average shear wave velocity for the upper 100 feet of the site profile (Vs) using the available subsurface data , <br />consistent with Section 20.3 guidance. The Site Class was evaluated using Vs, as well as adjusted values of Vs/1.3 <br />and Vs*1.3 to account for uncertainty in the estimated shear wave velocity. In accordance with ASCE 7 -22 Section <br />20.3, the governing Site Class is taken as the more conservative classification resulting from this evaluation. <br />Seismic design parameters were evaluated for each applicable Site Class using the ASCE 7 -22 Seismic Design <br />Map Tool, and the governing (most conservative) values were selected. Because Site Class D produced the <br />highest values of SMS, SM1, SDS, and SD1, Site Class D governs for design. Accordingly, the site coefficients <br />corresponding to Site Class D were used to develop the seismic design parameters presented below. <br /> <br />Seismic design parameters were obtained using the USGS / ASCE 7 -22 Seismic Design Map Tool <br />(https://ascehazardtool.org/) for the project location for Risk Category II and Site Class D. The ASCE 7-22 seismic <br />design parameters are presented in Table 1 below. <br /> <br />Table 1: Seismic Design Parameter Recommendations (ASCE 7-22). <br />PARAMETER ASCE 7-22 <br />Site Class D <br />Ss 0.82g <br />S1 0.37g <br />SMS 1.1g <br />SM1 0.8g <br />SDS 0.74g <br />SD1 0.53g <br />PGAM 0.49g <br />Design PGA (= PGAM /1.5) 0.327g <br />Note: Site Latitude = 44.030159°, Site Longitude = -123.05598° <br /> <br />In accordance with Section 1803.5.11 of the 2022 OSSC, we have included the following evaluation of potential <br />geologic and seismic hazards including slope instability, liquefaction, and surface rupture due to faulting or lateral <br />spreading: <br /> <br />Slope Stability <br /> <br />In our professional opinion, the risk of slope instability of the native soils on the project site is low, based on the <br />strength and consistency of the native soil strata encountered in our subsurface explorations. In addition, on the <br />date of our site investigation, most of the slopes on the project site were not overly steep (i.e. greater than 2H:1V <br />or 25 degrees from horizontal). As mentioned above, we did observe an area of the site that we consider steeply
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.