30.83 acres to 37.25 acres netting a 21% increase. Property 2 decreases in size from 8.44 acres to <br />2.02 acres netting a 76% decrease. 76%<200%. <br />4. Adjustment is not a reconfiguration requiring partition or subdivision, since the number of <br />properties is unchanged. <br />5. Since the minimum lot width in C-2 zones is 50 feet per EC 9.2180 and the smallest portion of <br />Property 2 is 60 feet, and the 60-foot portion pre-existed this line adjustment, no flag lot is <br />created on Property 2. Property I has more than enough street frontage and is well above the <br />minimum lot width of 50 feet. <br />3. EC 9.8415 Approval Criteria <br />The proposal complies with the approval criteria in EC 9.8415: <br />1. The only building affected by this property line adjustment is the building on Tax Lot 17-04-. <br />25-10 300, which prior to this adjustment was on both parcels, and after the adjustment would be <br />entirely on Property 2. <br />2. Resulting lots meet minimum lot size and dimension standards and comply with this land use <br />code, building codes, fire codes, and Chapter 7. <br />3. Proposal does not conflict with conditions of prior land use approvals. <br />4. There are no outstanding public assessments or liens. <br />S. Neither property is in a (/WR) Water Resource Conservation Overlay Zone (/WQ) Water <br />Quality Overlay Zone, this item is unapplicable. <br />6. This item is relevant to R-1 zoned properties only. Both properties are zoned C 2, this is <br />unapplicable. <br />4. Conclusion <br />The proposed property line adjustment meets the applicability standards in EC 9.8405, satisfies <br />the approval criteria in EC 9.8415, and complies with overlay and neighborhood requirements. <br />All subject parcels have been confirmed as legal lots through City -approved Lot Validations (LV <br />25-01 and LV 25-03). <br />RENEWS 06130g026. <br />