Our Village Page 10 of 11 <br />Adjustment Review Application: Written Statement <br />March 13, 2026 <br /> <br />Schirmer Consulting, LLC · PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 · (541) 234-5108 <br />Landscape Architecture + Land Use Planning <br />Adjustment Review Approval Criteria and Responses <br />9.8030 Adjustment Review – Approval Criteria. The planning director shall approve, conditionally approve, <br />or deny an adjustment review application. Approval or conditional approval shall be based on <br />compliance with the following applicable criteria. <br /> <br />EC 9.8030 (8) Multiple-Unit Standards Adjustment. Where this land use code provides that the <br />multiple-unit standards may be adjusted, the standards may be adjusted upon finding that <br />the design achieves all of the following: <br />(f) Vehicle Parking. The requirements set forth in EC 9.5500(12) may be adjusted if the <br />proposal achieves to the same degree as would strict compliance with the standards all <br />of the following: <br />1. Limitations on the use of continuous parking drives in large-scale multiple-unit <br />developments. <br />2. Limitations on the size of individual parking lots in multiple-unit development. <br />3. Minimal negative aspects of parking uses in multiple-unit developments. <br /> <br />As is typical of an infill site, the design team re-uses functional elements, such as <br />parking lots, for the proposed development. This is an efficient and more <br />sustainable approach to development. Because this is not a vacant site, <br />compliance with all of the land use code criteria is not feasible. Redesigning the <br />existing parking area to reduce its size means that any new units placed east of <br />it—regardless of their distance from the street—will technically have parking <br />located between the buildings and Barton Street for the 60-foot width of the parking <br />lot. <br /> <br />In accordance with EC 9.8030(8)(f) continuous parking drives are limited to the <br />proposed single Parking Court. There are no other parking courts to connect to and <br />no drive aisles connecting parking courts together. <br /> <br />The limitations placed on the re-design of the parking area were a result of the <br />client’s desire to create additional open space, gardening area and bike parking. <br />Clustering of units, as shown on the Site Plan, was an intentional design choice to <br />foster a sense of community and closer connection among residents. It also results <br />in less site disturbance. <br /> <br />Arbitrarily reducing this parking lot to the maximum allowable size simply means <br />eliminating parking spaces and creating unnecessary parking challenges for the <br />residents and their expected guests. <br /> <br />By reconfiguring the existing parking lot, the design greatly reduces the area of <br />parking between the proposed buildings and the street compared to what would <br />have resulted if the original lot were retained. Most parking spaces are now <br />positioned away from the residential units, helping to lessen the visual and <br />functional (negative) impacts of parking on the overall site environment. <br /> <br />Based on these findings, the proposed development will limit the use of continuous <br />parking drives, limits the size of individual parking lots and minimizes negative aspects of <br />parking uses. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />