Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

The applicant is required to analyze trees within the Conservation Area on their property, which they have performed as required. No off -site tree analysis is required under the land use code. As noted in Section 1 of the decision, the applicant does need to include and replant any Conservation Area to the south of the road, in between the property line and the southern edge of the sidewalk/road. This small strip is within a Conservation Area. There are no trees identified within the southern edge of the sidewalk/road impacted area of the proposed standards review and off -site trees are not part of the review for this application. The applicant proposes stormwater management in accordance with the requirements of Eugene Code, as was evaluated during the Tentative PUD process. the Videra stream will continue to utilize the existing stormwater drainage pipe that existed prior to this proposal. The road area subject to this standards review will not reroute water flowing through this existing stormwater drainage pipe. Stormwater from the street will be managed by the designed stormwater management areas consistent with Eugene Code. • No specifics about how chemical products, harmful substances and other materials are prevented from infiltrating the wetland, stream and Videra Park. In Section 1 of the Decision, EC 9.4980(4)(b) addresses this issue and a new condition of approval is required to ensure consistency with this standard. • The extension of Randy Lane, as well as the swales to the north of it, must be prevented from denying critical water for the trees on the other side of the property line in Videra Park. There are no approval criteria in the Final PUD or the Standards Review that would require the applicant to monitor the health of trees not located on their property. • The map labels the wetland as Wetland 2B and shows clearly that the wetland is wider than the conservation setback on the developer's site map and thus the setback does not meet the 25-foot setback requirement. The proper /WR conservation area has not been determined, as the /WR conservation area for the wetlands was not calculated or mapped at all. Nor was the total footprint combined. The City should insist that a 25-foot setback for the wetland be combined with the 40-foot setback for the Category C stream. In some places, this revised setback will be more than that in the current the site plan. This Standards Review is looking only at the impacted area of the Conservations Area where it is impacted by the construction and extension of Randy Lane. When it comes to the Goal 5 riparian resources, it is common for a stream to also have related wetlands in nearly the same location. The extent of the construction is limited to the southern portion of the creek, where March 2026 Findings & Decision of the Planning Director Page 6 of 28 Braewood Hills Third Addition (SDR 25-02 & PDF 25-01)