Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

• Concerns with shared driveways with and cars parked in a single driveway, the Joint Access & Maintenance Agreement (JAM) for the shared driveways, the variable widths and the maintenance responsibilities. The driveways that are too narrow for emergency vehicle access and is a risk to public safety. Section 2 of this decision provides full analysis of how this final PUD application is in conformance with each of the above listed conditions of approval of the tentative PUD. The findings for Condition of Approval 5 regarding the JAM include an additional condition for compliance prior to final site plan approval. The Fire Marshal's Office has reviewed the plans and provided referral comments, which did not express concerns with the driveway widths or indicate a risk to public safety. These referral comments are included in the record materials. Further, as this proposal is the finalization of the previously approved PUD, this proposal will not generally add any additional or new concerns related to this topic that were not previously argued during the Tentative PUD process. • Compliance with the required 25-foot buffer established at EC 9.4920(2)(b) has not been clearly demonstrated. EC 9.4920(3) Combined conservation footprint for wetland and stream Natural resource identification requirements under the /WR Overlay. No development is currently proposed within the Conservation Area identified above that is not already being considered as part of this Standards Review application. Other development, such as the development of individual lots over time will be required to demonstrate compliance with the applicable setbacks for protected riparian resources located through the development site. This approval process does include any approval criteria that would warrant or otherwise mandate the mapping of the 25-foot buffer as part of this specific process. • Violates Eugene Code 9.4930(3)(e)(3), which requires that all excavated areas be backfilled with existing native soil. This code section applies to new underground utility lines within conservation areas and requires backfilling to the existing grade with native soil to minimize the impact to the conservation area. However, EC 9.4930(3)(b) allows for the construction of public streets and public utilities subject to the standards at EC 9.4980, which are addressed in Section 1 of this Decision, therefore EC 9.4930(3)(e)(3) would not be applicable. • Did not adequately identify wetlands within 50 feet of property lines. All known, existing wetlands are shown on the plans and in relation to proposed lot lines. Most of the wetlands on the site are listed as unprotected. The only wetland identified for protection exists in the same area as the protected Videra stream. When it comes to the Goal 5 riparian March 2026 Findings & Decision of the Planning Director Page 4 of 28 Braewood Hills Third Addition (SDR 25-02 & PDF 25-01)