Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

native vegetation. The project area spans a small section of the resource in the southwest portion of the property. Specifically, the project is within the area of Upland Resource E35 A and Wetland Resource AMA-513. Videra Creek is a Category B stream. While the protected creek crosses the entire property in the southern portion of the site, the scale of impact within the conservation area is limited to approximately 1,105 square feet of disturbance. In accordance with Eugene Code Sections (EC) 9.4930(2)(c), the removal of non-native and invasive plants and the planting of native plants are an allowed use. In accordance with EC 9.4930(3)(b), the construction of public streets is subject to a Standards Review (EC 9.8460 — 9.8472) and the standards at EC 9.4980 /WR Water Resources Conservation Overlay Zone Development Standards (1) through (11). While there are other protected resources within the remainder of the subject property, at this time, the only activity that requires a Standards Review is the construction of Randy Lane. All other protected riparian and wetland resources will be protected and reviewed with individual development applications over time. Additional details of the proposal are included in the applicant's written statement, on proposed site plans and in other supporting documentation, all of which are included as part of the public record and located in the application file for reference. Procedure, Public Notice, and Agency Referrals Application Submitted September 5,. 2025 Application Complete Public notice of the subject application was mailed in accordance with EC 9.7210. Twenty-two concerned citizens submitted testimony during the public comment period, all of which are available in the file record for reference. Many of the comments submitted shared the same or very similar concerns regarding several key issues. The following testimony summary and review will focus on the general topics of concern or application deficiency as expressed throughout the various testimonies received rather than a review of each individual piece of testimony. Testimony concerns, questions or statements of application deficiencies will be listed in bold font and staff analysis will be in regular font. • Increased traffic and limited ability for emergency services response. Eugene Springfield Fire Marshal's Office reviewed the proposed plans for both this current application and the approved tentative planned unit development (PUD) and tentative subdivision (City File # PDT 24-1 and ST 24-3) and expressed no concerns related to emergency service access to the site. Fire Marshal's Office comments dated February 25, 2026 (included as Attachment A), will require "No parking -Fire Lane" signage on both sides of the private streets in the development to ensure adequate widths for emergency vehicular movements within the March 2026 Findings & Decision of the Planning Director Page 2 of 28 Braewood Hills Third Addition (SDR 25-02 & PDF 25-01)