Decision - Laserfiche WebLink

site. As indicated in the July 2024 tentative PUD staff report, Public Works staff confirmed that safe and adequate transportation systems are found in the vicinity and adjoining public streets including Hawkins Lane and Randy Lane are already built to applicable street standards. Therefore, as this proposal is the finalization of the previously approved PUD, this proposal will not general any additional concerns related to this topic that were not previously argued during the Tentative PUD process. • Land is not stable on the hillside. As discussed in the July 2024 tentative PUD staff report the site is exempt from the standards of EC 9.6710 Geological and Geotechnical Analysis due to the status of the subject property being on the City's adopted Goal 5 inventory and exempted from the standards per EC 9.6710(3)(f). However, geotechnical analysis will be required during future permitting processes, including but not limited to the Privately Engineered Public Improvement permit process, site development permits, and building permits to the extent that public improvement standards and building code requirements apply in subsequent stages of development. Therefore, as this proposal is the finalization of the previously approved PUD, this proposal will not general any additional concerns related to this topic that were not previously argued during the Tentative PUD process. • The site should include a park area, also walking trails that connect Melvin Miller Park, Skyview City Park, and Videra Park. The tentative PUD approval was approved under the Housing/Clear and Objective standards of EC 9.8325, which do not require the inclusion of parks or walking trails within the development. This application for final PUD requires substantial conformance with the tentative PUD approval. Therefore, there is no ability to require a park within the site as part of this approval process. • The Final PUD does not conform to the tentative PUD approval concerning the Joint Access Management agreement and the various Joint Access Easements, Conditions 5, 6, 15 and 16. The Final PUD does not conform to the tentative PUD Condition 7, Public Utility Easement. The Final PUD does not conform to the tentative PUD Condition 26 — stormwater compliance with EC 9.6796. Section 2 of this decision provides full analysis of how this final PUD application is in conformance with each of the above listed conditions of approval of the tentative PUD. The findings for Condition of Approval 5 include an additional condition for compliance prior to final plat. Condition 26 required the applicant to submit updated application materials that demonstrate compliance with EC 9.6796. The findings for Condition of Approval 6 include an additional condition for compliance prior to final plat. March 2026 Findings & Decision of the Planning Director Page 3 of 28 Braewood Hills Third Addition (SDR 25-02 & PDF 25-01)