D. Construction Practices – EC 9.4930 & 9.4980 <br />The applicant has not demonstrated compliance with: <br />Native soil backfill requirements (EC 9.4930(3)(e)3) <br />Specific, enforceable measures to prevent petroleum, chemicals, or construction <br />materials from entering wetlands or the stream (EC 9.4980(4)) <br />Protection of saturated soils from compaction within the conservation area <br />General statements of acknowledgment are not equivalent/sufficient to demonstrated <br />compliance with mandatory code requirements. <br />III. Impacts to Videra Park <br />A substantial portion of the southern boundary abuts Videra Park, which contains Videra <br />Creek and associated wetlands. <br />The application does not provide: <br />A mapped combined conservation footprint extending across the shared boundary <br />Tree identification and critical root zone mapping near the property line <br />Hydrological analysis of how the Randy Lane extension and associated swales may alter <br />water flow affecting park-side trees <br />Given the sensitivity of native oaks to altered drainage patterns, these omissions are significant <br />and should be resolved before approval. <br />Conclusion – Request for Denial <br />Approval requires clear and affirmative demonstration of compliance with Eugene Code. The <br />applicant has not demonstrated compliance with: <br />EC 9.8365 – Final PUD conformity <br />EC 9.4920(2)(b) – 25-foot wetland setback <br />EC 9.4920(3) – Combined conservation footprint <br />/WR Overlay natural resource identification requirements <br />EC 9.4930(3)(e)3 – Native soil backfill