EARTH <br />DYNAMICS <br />LLC <br /> <br />ReMi Analysis 1200 Alder St <br />October, 2025 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />6.0 LIMITATIONS <br /> <br />The geophysical method used in this study involves the inversion of measured data. <br />Theoretically, the inversion process yields an infinite number of models which will fit the <br />data. Further, many geologic materials have the same seismic velocity. We have <br />presented models and interpretations which we believe to be the best fit given the <br />geology and known conditions at the site. However, no warranty is made or intended <br />by this report or by oral or written presentation of this work. Earth Dynamics accepts no <br />responsibility for damages because of decisions made or actions taken based upon this <br />report. <br /> <br /> <br />7.0 REFERENCES <br /> <br /> <br />ASCE/SEI ASCE 7-22, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings <br />and other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers, Structural Engineering <br />Institute, Reston, VA. <br /> <br />Louie, J.N. (2001). “Faster, better: shear-wave velocity to 100 meters depth from <br /> refraction microtremor arrays”, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 91, 347-364. <br /> <br />Nazarian, S., and Stokoe II, K.H., (1984), “In situ shear-wave velocities from spectral <br /> analysis of surface waves”, Proceedings for the World Conference on <br /> Earthquake Engineering Vol. 8, San Francisco, Calif., July 21-28, v.3, 31-38. <br /> <br />IBC (2021) 2021 International Building Code , International Code Council, Washington <br />D.C. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED <br />EARTH DYNAMICS LLC <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Daniel Lauer <br />Partner - Senior Geophysicist <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />