My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Appeal Testimony Received 10-13-2024 thru 1pm on 01-14-2025
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2024
>
PDT 24-1
>
Appeal Testimony Received 10-13-2024 thru 1pm on 01-14-2025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2025 12:51:01 PM
Creation date
1/16/2025 12:50:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
24
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
BRAEWOOD HILLS 3RD ADDITION
Document Type
Appeal Public Comments Prior to Hearing
Document_Date
1/14/2025
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAW OFFICE OF BILL KLOOS PC <br />OREGON LAND USE LAW <br />375 W. 4TH AVENUE, SUITE 204 <br />EUGENE, OR 97401 <br />TEL: 541.954.1260 <br />WEB: WWW.LANDUSEOREGON.COM <br /> <br />BILL KLOOS <br />BILLKLOOS@LANDUSEOREGON.COM <br /> <br /> <br />January 10, 2025 <br /> <br />Applicant’s Outline for Argument to Planning Commission <br />: <br /> <br /> <br />Appeal Issues potentially resolved with Staff recommendation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 10. <br /> <br />Open Issues: 5, 6, 9. <br /> <br /> <br />• 9: Whether City may use its Overlay Zones to limit/negate Middle Housing rights? <br />Location of Key Documents in 159-page Staff Report to PC <br />PDF # Item <br />3 Staff Report Narrative <br />21-23 Issues 5/6: Need for a Randy Lane stub to be “public”? <br />25-27 Issue 9: 901’ elevation Middle Housing development prohibition <br />31 Attach A: Vicinity Map <br />32 Attach B: Site Plan <br />33 Attach C: HO Decision <br />73-76 Discussion of /PD Overlay 901’ development prohibition <br />80 Attach D: PC Appeal Form <br />82 Attach E: Appeal Documents <br />82 Appeal Narrative with 10 Issues: <br />88 Appeal Issue #5: No need for “public” Randy Lane road stub <br />88-89 Appeal Issue #6: Failure to justify exaction of “public” road <br />88-91 Appeal Issue #9 MHS defeats 901’ development prohibition <br />92 Site Plan <br />93 Applicant Aug. 14 Second Open Record Submittal rejected by HO <br />95-106 Applicant’s Argument re Middle Housing Statute vs. Overlay Zones <br />98 Summary 3 LUBA decisions remanding Director decisions in Kamps-Hughes <br />106-109 Applicant’s Argument on no need for “public” street stub <br />118 Attach E: Metro Plan Scenic Sites Working Paper (April 12, 1978) <br />125 Scenic Sites WP Figure H-2 <br />126 Attach F: Ordinance No 20351 re Goal 4 Program (Nov. 18, 2025) <br />Appeal Testimony (PDT 24-01 & ST 24-03) - Batch #1 Page 14 of 43
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.