My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Testimony – Open Record Part 1 – July 11 to July 29, 2024
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2024
>
PDT 24-1
>
Public Testimony – Open Record Part 1 – July 11 to July 29, 2024
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2024 3:10:50 PM
Creation date
8/1/2024 5:07:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
24
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
BRAEWOOD HILLS 3RD ADDITION
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
7/31/2024
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
intact; however, a connecting corridor needs to be maintained between the two protected <br />sides. I suggest that a public/private partnership or HOA be established to retain the Videra <br />Oak Meadow’s woods in a natural state such as through a conservation easement. <br /> <br />For several years with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service I was responsible for evaluating, <br />commenting, and obtaining mitigation and clearance for development proposals of various kinds <br />all along the Front Range megalopolis fusing together in Colorado. My job was to identify and <br />advocate for the needs of federally protected natural resource values such as listed species and <br />at-risk habitats of special concern. Development projects included some involving hundreds <br />upon hundreds of lots establishing whole communities at a single stroke including infrastructure, <br />commercial services, fire protection, schools, etc. Some of these cities’ officials raced forward <br />with development even before water rights had been secured, rubber-stamping every proposal <br />put forward, turning established peaceful communities or agricultural lands into masses of <br />congested sprawl in a matter of a few years. However, when a protected public resource value <br />was threatened by a developer, they were required to first avoid identifiable impacts, then <br />seriously minimize and mitigate impacts that could not be avoided and restore onsite and nearby <br />habitat in compensation. The developer pays. The conservation costs are built into the project’s <br />spreadsheet and by downsizing their ambitions. <br /> <br />On a very small scale, this kind of high impact development is what I see proposed here for the <br />Videra Oak Meadows. It’s the same attitude, to take without consequences. Please do not allow <br />Piculell to take from us by inflicting their bad concept on Videra Oak Meadow, a site that has so <br />much to give us now and long after Piculell has vanished. I urge the City of Eugene not to bend <br />over for Piculell. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.