_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Staff Report | Braewood Hills 3rd Addition (PDT 24-1 & ST 24-3) <br />acre for areas west of Friendly Street where the subject property is located. Also, as established <br />at EC 9.2751(1)(b), any middle housing development would be exempt from maximum density <br />limitations. Based on these findings, this criterion is met. <br /> <br />EC 9.8520(2): The proposed subdivision complies with all of the following, unless <br />specifically exempt from compliance through a code provision applicable to a special <br />area zone or overlay zone: <br /> <br />(a) EC 9.2000 through EC 9.4170 regarding applicable lot dimensions and density <br />requirements for the subject zone and any applicable overlay zones. Within the <br />/WR Water Resources Conservation Overlay Zone or /WQ Water Quality <br />Overlay Zone, no new lot may be created if more than 33% of the lot, as <br />created, would be occupied by either: <br /> <br />1. The combined area of the /WR conservation setback and any portion of the <br />Goal 5 Water Resource Site that extends landward beyond the conservation <br />setback; or <br /> <br />2. The /WQ Management Area. <br /> <br />As discussed in Section 1 – Planned Unit Development Evaluation at EC 9.8325(5) and <br />incorporated herein by reference, the proposed lots meet all requirements for lot dimensions <br />and density. Lots that do not meet minimum lot frontage requirements are allowed flexibility in <br />design with approval of the Tentative PUD. None of the proposed lots exceed the 33% <br />limitations for the /WR Water Resources Conservation Overlay area. Based on these findings, <br />this criterion is met. <br /> <br />(b) EC 9.6800 through EC 9.6875 Standards for Streets, Alleys, and Other Public <br />Ways. <br /> <br />As discussed in Section 1 – Planned Unit Development Evaluation at EC 9.8325(4) and <br />incorporated herein by reference, these standards are either met, met with conditions, or not <br />applicable. Based on the available information and proposed conditions, the standards at EC <br />9.6800 through EC 9.6875 are met to the extent they are applicable. <br /> <br />(c) EC 9.6500 through EC 9.6505 Public Improvement Standards. <br /> <br />As discussed in Section 1 – Planned Unit Development Evaluation at EC 9.8325(5)(b) and <br />incorporated herein by reference, these standards are either met with conditions, or not <br />applicable. Based on the available information and proposed conditions, the standards at EC <br />9.6500 through EC 9.6505 are met to the extent they are applicable. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Page 30 of 87