My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Works Incomplete Checklist
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2024
>
PDT 24-1
>
Public Works Incomplete Checklist
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2024 11:29:31 AM
Creation date
5/10/2024 11:29:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
24
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
BRAEWOOD HILLS 3RD ADDITION
Document Type
Application Completeness Review
Document_Date
4/29/2024
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Public Works Subdivision Tentative Completeness Review Form Revised June 2016 Page 2 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />13. If applicable, identify flow control by demonstrating how there is no <br />increase in flow rates or volumes if contributing to a Headwaters Area <br />waterway, per EC 9.6793(3)(a). <br /> 14. The applicant has submitted approval from Lane County for proposed <br />stormwater discharge to Lane County systems. <br />Comments: <br />7 & 11- The updated stormwater report indicates the existing runoff rate for pre -development but does not include <br />the post-development runoff rate. Please update the stormwater report to include the post-development runoff rate. <br /> <br />The stormwater report and site plans indicate that there is a development to the north that is discharging onto the <br />development site. The proposal also includes a ditch inlet to catch this runoff and then pipe to the proposed pipe <br />system within the development and then from there it will discharge to Videra Creek. After reviewing the <br />stormwater report it does not include an analysis of the down stream system and the effects that this proposal will <br />have on it. <br /> <br />Water Supply Requirements <br />Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A <br /> 15. Include a diagram (including diameter) of existing and proposed water <br />mains. <br /> 16. Show existing and proposed fire hydrants. <br />Comments: <br /> <br />Street and Utility Improvement Requirements <br />Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A <br /> 17. Show existing and proposed public and private improvements. <br /> 18. Note on the plan whether public improvements are to be constructed <br />publicly or privately. <br /> 19. Note on the plat the location, size and species of existing and proposed <br />street trees. <br /> 20. Note on plat the location of any existing or proposed street lights. <br />Comments: <br /> <br />Contour Intervals <br />Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A <br /> 21. Note on the plans the City Bench Mark used. <br /> <br /> One-foot contour intervals for ground slopes up to five percent. <br /> Two-foot contour intervals for ground slopes between five and ten percent. <br /> Five-foot contour intervals for ground slopes exceeding ten percent. <br />Comments: <br /> <br />Supporting Analysis and Documents <br />Submitted Missing Incomplete N/A <br /> 22. Submit preliminary title report per 9.8510(1). <br />Comments: <br /> <br />Geotechnical Report Requirements <br />Submitted <br />/ <br />Complete <br />Missing/ <br />Inconsistent <br />Data <br />Incomplete / <br />Unsupported <br />Data <br />N/A <br /> <br />The applicant’s analysis must address EC 9.6710 and AO 58 -02-25-F. <br /> <br />23. Level 1 Geotechnical Analysis has been submitted because the <br />site slopes are between 5 and 10 percent or because the <br />development includes public improvements. The report includes: <br />required record data; a description of the development and property; <br />a specific statement regarding the absence or presence of unstable <br />soils; and concludes that the site is suitable for the proposed <br />development without further investigation or recommendations. <br />Level 3 is required if specific recommendations are necessary. <br /> <br />24. Level 2 Geotechnical Analysis has been submitted because the <br />site slopes are equal to or greater than 10%. The report includes: <br />all of the Level 1 information above; test pit locations consistent with
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.