planning process to amend the 1987 Urban Facilities Plan, the planning team started with the <br />idea of creating a new plan from the beginning. <br />c. Can we layer the new neighborhood plan on top of the 1987 plan? <br />The City could adopt the new neighborhood plan without repealing the 1987 Urban Facilities <br />Plan. However, in the event of any inconsistencies, staff would recommend creating an <br />introductory statement clarifying the purpose of the new plan and the relationship between the <br />plans. In addition, staff would recommend a statement describing the intended replacement of <br />the 1987 Urban Facilities Plan Diagram and associated policies with the city-wide land use <br />diagram upon its adoption. <br />d.) Is it possible to do a land use diagram? What are the options? <br />There are multiple options regarding the land use diagram. The current proposal is to move <br />forward with the proposed Neighborhood Plan that does not include a land use diagram, and to <br />repeal the 1987 Urban Facilities Plan and its associated land use diagram. Without a land use <br />diagram for the area, the Metro Plan diagram would apply. The City has started work on a city- <br />wide parcel -specific land use diagram and is aiming to have this diagram adopted as part of the <br />City's comprehensive plan by 2026. Because neither the Metro Plan diagram nor the existing <br />1987 Plan diagram are parcel specific, and because of the general outdated nature of the 1987 <br />plan, staff recommend the repeal of the 1987 Plan and land use diagram and reliance on the <br />Metro Plan Diagram until the parcel -specific land use diagram is developed and adopted in the <br />Envision Eugene comprehensive plan. <br />However, testimony has been submitted that argues for keeping the 1987 Plan in place along <br />with the new Neighborhood Plan, with the intention of deciding what to do with the 1987 Plan <br />at the same time the City decides how to address other refinement plans once a city-wide plan <br />diagram and policies are adopted. Staff can support this option as well, and if the Planning <br />Commission is interested in this, would bring back language that would need to be added to the <br />new Neighborhood Plan to address the relationship between the two plans (i.e., the new <br />Neighborhood Plan would control in cases of conflict). Since the two plans serve different <br />purposes, this option appears to be technically viable as well. <br />A third option would be to import certain parts of the 1987 Plan into the new Neighborhood <br />Plan. This option could be problematic in a few ways. There are many variations of which parts <br />of the old plan to carry forward, and no easy way to make the decision. There does not appear <br />to be a compelling reason to do this, and it would therefore appear to add time and complexity <br />to the process unnecessarily. <br />e. Will there be a parcel -specific diagram for outside the City/inside the Urban Growth <br />Boundary (UGB)? <br />0 <br />Page 12 of 21 <br />