All other key urban services are currently available to the subject property, or can be extended in an <br />orderly and efficient manner to the property as needed to serve development. <br />Based on the findings above, key urban facilities and services are currently available, or can be <br />extended in an orderly manner to the subject property as required, consistent with this criterion. <br />4) The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable siting requirements set out <br />for the specific zone in: <br />u) An uncodified ordinance establishing a site specific S-H Historic Special Area Zone, a <br />copy of which is maintained at the city's planning and development department. <br />The proposed zone change is to establish a site specific S-H Historic Special Area Zone. Criteria to <br />establish this zone begin at EC 9.3020 and are addressed above. The uncodified ordinance, if <br />adopted, will be maintained at the City's planning and development department consistent with <br />this criterion. <br />5) In cases where the NR zone is applied based on EC 9.2510(3), the property owner shall <br />enter into a contractual arrangement with the city to ensure the area is maintained as a <br />natural resource area fora minimum of 50 years. <br />The NR zone is not requested or applicable in this instance. Therefore, the above criterion is <br />inapplicable. <br />Transportation Planning Rule: <br />The Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) (OAR 660-012-0060(1)) requires compliance if a change to <br />a functional plan, acknowledged comprehensive plan, or land uses regulation would significantly <br />affect an existing or planned transportation facility. The Hearings Official in the zone change <br />decision for Hahn, et al (City file Z 08-9) concluded that City of Eugene's zoning map changes are <br />not categorically excluded from the Transportation Planning Rule (Oregon Administrative Rule <br />OAR 660-012-0060). <br />The applicant's State Transportation Planning Rule (Goal 12) analysis indicates that no significant <br />impact to the transportation system will occur as a result of the proposed zone change from R-2 to <br />S-H. As noted in the analysis, under the existing zoning of the 0.44 acre property, a reasonable <br />assumption based on allowed uses would be multi-family development with a maximum of 12 <br />dwelling units, which translates into a potential eight (8) trips during the PM peak hour (ITE Land <br />Use Code 220; 0.55 trips per dwelling). The worst-case development scenarios (the most intense <br />traffic generators) of uses to be permitted by the proposed S-H ordinance are as follows: <br />Use ITE Land Use Code Estimated PM Peak <br />Professional Office 710 3 trips <br />Restaurant 931 y 16 trips <br />Findings - Brunner Schmitz House (Z 10-12) Page 7 <br />407