My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
23_10_06 Batch1 Testimony
>
OnTrack
>
MA
>
2023
>
MA 23-5
>
23_10_06 Batch1 Testimony
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2023 4:01:51 PM
Creation date
10/9/2023 4:01:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
MA
File Year
23
File Sequence Number
5
Application Name
River Road-Santa Clara Neighborhood Plan
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
10/6/2023
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
road and ROW to high standards. There is a natural stormwater swale running along both sides of Rosewood <br />(notice the culverts lower-right) which neighbors are also responsible for maintaining and protecting. The <br />yellow house is City (annexed) property. <br />The ‘Howard Meadows’ developer submitted and the City approved a site design that called for filling and <br />raising the northern end of the 3 acre site by at least three feet – raising serious neighbor concerns. Neighbors <br />had to be fully engaged with the City and the subdivision process to ensure bollards were installed and <br />Rosewood was protected from construction vehicles and dangerous increased two-way traffic. Neighbors’ <br />stormwater concerns, based on the elevation change on the North end, were duly noted. <br />Related Plan references and recommendations: ‘Stormwater’ and ‘Transportation’ are addressed in the <br />proposed Neighborhood Plan but there are so many nuances to the mix of jurisdictions in RR/SC that it would <br />have been very difficult to cover all the possibilities and … <br />Both the ‘Howard Meadows’ and ‘ECCO Apartments” examples raise an important question; what rights/voice <br />do County residential property owners, who front and have maintained LAR’s for decades in RR/SC, have <br />when it comes to new developments that directly impact them? <br />Community <br />Above are two more current photos from ‘Howard Meadows’ … to illustrate the lack of on-site parking <br />and how long-established neighbors who border the site will be impacted. <br />The ‘Howard Meadows’ subdivision is an example of how current code can be applied to negate many <br />of the aspirational goals, the heart of Community, in the Neighborhood Plan: ‘respect’ ‘compatibility’ <br />‘neighborhood character’ ‘quality of life’ … each a subjective discussion, with an eye to collaborative <br />problem-solving, worth having. <br />Thank you again for the opportunity to recognize the work and dedication of my awesome RR/SC <br />neighbors and for letting me add my 2-cents worth of context to your discussion. I trust you will give <br />every aspect of the proposed Neighborhood Plan the serious consideration it deserves and I look <br />forward to hearing your recommendations. <br />Sincerely, <br />Steve Norris, River Road <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.