City of Eugene - Zone Change <br />October 10, 2022 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />Finding: As noted above, the Metro Plan accounts for auxiliary uses, such as schools, within the <br />residential land use designations. Both the existing R-1 zone and the proposed PL zone are consistent <br />with and effectively implement the LDR plan designation. The land was not previously exempted from the <br />TPR during an urbanization process to amend the urban growth boundary. The city has an <br />acknowledged TSP (Eugene 2035 Transportation System Plan); however, the TSP did not account for <br />the proposed PL zone. Thus, the applicant has conducted a transportation planning rule analysis (TPRA) <br />that addresses the necessary criteria of the rule, specifically OAR 660-012-0060(1). Subsection (1) <br />includes criteria, excerpted below, to determine if a proposed zoning map amendment will "significantly <br />affect" a transportation facility. <br />(1) If an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or a land use <br />regulation (including a zoning map) would significantly affect an existing or planned <br />transportation facility, then the local government must put in place measures as provided in <br />section (2) of this rule, unless the amendment is allowed under section (3), (9) or (10) of this <br />rule. A plan or land use regulation amendment significantly affects a transportation facility if it <br />would: <br />(a) Change the functional classification of an existing or planned transportation facility <br />(exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan); <br />(b) Change standards implementing a functional classification system; or <br />(c) Result in any of the effects listed in paragraphs (A) through (C) of this subsection. If a <br />local government is evaluating a performance standard based on projected levels of <br />motor vehicle traffic, then the results must be based on projected conditions measured <br />at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP. As part of evaluating <br />projected conditions, the amount of traffic projected to be generated within the area of <br />the amendment may be reduced if the amendment includes an enforceable, ongoing <br />requirement that would demonstrably limit traffic generation, including, but not limited to, <br />transportation demand management. This reduction may diminish or completely <br />eliminate the significant effect of the amendment. <br />(A) Types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the functional <br />classification of an existing or planned transportation facility; <br />(8) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility such that <br />it would not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or <br />comprehensive plan; or <br />(C) Degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is <br />otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards identified in the TSP or <br />comprehensive plan. <br />As addressed in the attached Zone Change Transportation Analysis by Chris Clemow, PE, of Clemow & <br />Associates, LLC, 4J does not propose to redevelop the subject parcel at this time and any type of future <br />redevelopment is unknown. The property will continue to provide ancillary services to the existing school <br />and will not increase student capacity or site trip generation. The analysis has considered the reasonable <br />worst-case development in both the current R-1 and the proposed PL zone designations. The proposed <br />zone change from R-1 to PL will result in a de minimus trip generation increase and will not significantly <br />V MM A R C H I T E C T 5 + P L A N N L P S <br />