Appeal Final Order - Laserfiche WebLink

Final Order: The Harry and Etta Chase House | HDM 21-1/ HA 21-3/ ARB 21-2 Some testimony was clearly intended to be considered under specific factors or approval criteria, while other testimony was provided generally and the Board was left to decipher which, if any of the factors or criteria it may fit under. The Board discussed the video under Factor 4: Historic Significance, which demonstrates that the Board met its obligation to consider the evidence. Based on the Board’s consideration of the video under another factor, it is unclear how the Board’s decision on this factor was in error. Factor 6: Economic consequences Baker states that no mention of State property tax benefits is discussed and asserts that the Harry and Etta Chase House is eligible for the Oregon special assessment program. Baker also asserts that the Harlow Neighbors want to swap the vacant empty land north of the Q street slough for a future park with the tax lots proposed by Cornerstone Community Housing for development. The point of this being that if it were to occur, Cornerstone could have a vacant site and the Harlow Neighbors could have a park with mature landscaping and existing houses. Final Order Findings The Final Order of the Historic Review Board provides findings which address testimony from interested parties and discusses the applicant’s submittal. While the Board considered testimony from opponents, the Board ultimately found that the arguments raised by the applicant were sufficient to allow demolition when balancing this factor with others. Primary points from the argument were that it is not financially feasible to preserve the house given the employment opportunities offered by the construction, and the future benefits of an affordable housing development providing for about 379 residents earning less than 60% of the Area Median Income. The full findings of the Board are included in Attachment A. Planning Commission’s Determination The mention of a land swap and tax credits are not clearly relevant to the application at hand. While both items could perhaps offer a scenario in which the buildings proposed for demolition could be preserved, the Historic Review Board did not have the authority to require the applicant to apply for tax credits or pursue a land swap. Additionally, this argument was not clearly articulated for the Historic Review Board to consider. For these reasons, it is unclear how these items could have altered the Board’s decision on this factor. Factor 7: Design or construction rarity Baker argues that the Board did not consider testimony and a map that was submitted which shows that there are only three National Register properties north of the Willamette River in Eugene. Additionally, the Chase Gardens Residential Grouping is one of only a few National Register properties associated with the agricultural heritage of Eugene and the southern Willamette Valley. Finally, the statement that the Chase Gardens Residential Grouping is truly unique and that there is not another similar property on the National Register in all of Oregon and likely the Pacific Northwest is made again. Final Order Findings The Final Order of the Historic Review Board provides findings which address testimony from interested parties and discusses the applicant’s submittal. While the Board considered testimony from opponents, the Board ultimately found that the arguments raised by the applicant were sufficient to allow