Appeal Final Order - Laserfiche WebLink

l 3.Partnering with Eugene City Parks Appellants Argument The Harlow Neighbors state that in the Chase Gardens Nodal Development Plan, Chase Commons City Park is connected by a Foot/Bike Bridge to the applicant's site over the Q Street Floodway. The Harlow Neighbors request that the Historic Review Board and City Public Works/Parks address this with a condition of approval. Planning Commission's Determination The Historic Review Board was required to review the applicant's request as submitted and under specific approval criteria and factors from the Eugene Code and the relevant OAR. While the idea of partnership and additional design process are certainly understandable aspirations, the Board did not have the authority to require the applicant to enter into partnerships or undertake additional process. The Board was obligated to act in accordance with the timeline for a decision provided by EC 9.7330, and within the authority of the applicable approval criteria. In addition, as noted previously with respect to the Baker appeal under Factor 6, the idea of a land swap or some other partnership was not raised before the Historic Review Board making it a new issue that cannot be relied upon in finding error with the Board's decision on appeal. The Planning Commission finds that this appeal issue does not provided a basis for reversal or modification of the Historic Review Board's decision. V.CONCLUSION The Planning Commission has reviewed the record and has voted affirm the decision of the Historic Review Board, the Final Order of which is incorporated by reference and included as Attachment A. The foregoing findings and conclusions are adopted as the Final Order of the Eugene Planning Commission, for The Harry and Etta Chase House (HOM 21-1/ HA 21-3/ ARB 21-2}, this 17 th day of May 2022. Ken Beeson, Chair Eugene Planning Commission Final Order: The Harry and Etta Chase House I HDM 21-1/ HA 21-3/ ARB 21-2