My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Record Materials #2
>
OnTrack
>
Z
>
2022
>
Z 22-1
>
Open Record Materials #2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2022 9:16:17 AM
Creation date
4/26/2022 2:32:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
Z
File Year
22
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CORNERSTONE COMMUNITY HOUSING
Document Type
Public Testimony
Document_Date
4/21/2022
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Cornerstone Community Housing <br />Zone Change (Z 22-1) <br /> <br /> <br />To: Jeff Gepper, Senior Planner <br /> <br />From: Colin McArthur, AICP <br /> <br />Date: April 21, 2022 <br /> <br />Subject: Final Rebuttal Materials <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />This memorandum provides rebuttal information in response to materials submitted into the record for Z <br />22-1 by Mark Steven Baker (Baker) on April 20, 2022. These materials include: <br /> <br />• Secretary of the Interior Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. <br />• Lane County Statewide Planning Goal 5 Compliance for Wetland, Riparian Corridor, and Wildlife <br />Habitat document. <br />• Selected documents from the City of Eugene Certification of Local Governments (CLG) Application <br />with the Oregon State Preservation Office (SHPO). <br />• A copy of OAR 660-023-0200 as published by the Land Conservation and Development Department. <br />• A definition of "Protection" obtained from Wikipedia. <br />• Written testimony by Steven Baker on Zone Change (Z-21-1). <br /> <br />Zone Change Approval Criteria <br />The Zone Change approval criteria are set out in EC 9.8865(1) through (5). None of above noted materials <br />submitted by Baker specifically reference the approval criteria. The materials also do not allege any non- <br />compliance with the approval criteria. Further, they do not include any findings citing why the application <br />should be conditionally approval or denied. City staff has recommended approval of the application with <br />no conditions of approval. <br /> <br />Baker’s written testimony states that “[a] land use application for a zone change is the logical place to apply <br />these requirements.” These requirements relate to the protection of national register historic resources. <br />Baker goes on to site Eugene Code (EC) section 9.3450 S-H Historic Zones and the process for establishing <br />historic zones. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.