owned and maintained by Lane County. Neither street is designed to city standards and both <br />lack sidewalks, curb and gutter and are lacking street trees <br />The referral comments from Public Works staff confirm the availability of the above discussed <br />public infrastructure to serve the subject property at the time of development. <br />Further analysis of the availability of key urban facilities and services can be found under the <br />findings associated with the Annexation of property in City Resolution 5286 (Attachment C), <br />herein incorporated by reference, which confirm the availability of key urban facilities for the <br />site. <br />Based on these findings, this criterion is met. <br />EC 9.8865(4): The proposed zone change is consistent with the applicable siting <br />requirements set out for the specific zone in: <br />(f) EC 9.2735 Residential Zone Siting Requirements. <br />The siting requirements at EC 9.2735 are only applicable to requests relating to the R-1.5 zone. <br />Because the applicant is requesting R-1 zoning, there are no specific siting requirements and <br />this criterion is not applicable. <br />EC 9.8865(5): In cases where the NR zone is applied based on EC 9.2510(1)(b), the <br />property owner shall enter into a contractual arrangement with the city to ensure the <br />area is maintained as a natural resource area for a minimum of 50 years. <br />The applicant is not requesting the NR zone and the subject site is not located in an area that <br />would otherwise require the application of the NR zone. Based on the available information and <br />evidence, this criterion is not applicable. <br />Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) <br />Goal 12 Transportation of the Statewide Planning Goals, adopted by the Land Conservation and <br />Development Commission (LCDC), must be specifically addressed as part of the requested zone <br />change and in the context of Oregon Administrative Rules, as follows. <br />As adopted, OAR 660-012-0060(1) states: <br />(1) If an amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, <br />or a land use regulation (including a zoning map) would significantly affect an <br />existing or planned transportation facility, then the local government must put <br />in place measures as provided in section (2) of this rule, unless the amendment <br />is allowed under section (3), (9) or (10) of this rule. <br />The proposal qualifies for an exception under subsection (9), because the applicant is <br />requesting zoning that is consistent with the Metro Plan designation. <br />Staff Report <br />Claire Senderling I Z 22-2 <br />Page 7 of 41 <br />