My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet
>
OnTrack
>
Z
>
2022
>
Z 22-2
>
Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2022 4:02:27 PM
Creation date
4/6/2022 1:29:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
Z
File Year
22
File Sequence Number
2
Application Name
CLAIRE SENDERLING
Document Type
Staff Report
Document_Date
4/13/2022
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Testimony <br />As of the publication of this report, no testimony has been received regarding this proposal. If <br />written testimony is received prior to the public hearing, it will be provided to the Hearings <br />Official for consideration as part of the record. <br />Public Notice and Referrals <br />Public notice was provided in accordance with the requirements of Eugene's Land Use Code. <br />The Planning Division also provided information concerning the application to appropriate City <br />departments, public agencies, neighborhood organization, and service providers. All referral <br />comments received by the Planning Division on this application are included in the application <br />file for reference. The substance of any relevant referral comments is addressed in the context <br />of applicable approval criteria and standards in the following evaluation. <br />Zone Change Evaluation <br />In accordance with EC 9.7330, the Hearings Official is required to approve, approve with <br />conditions, or deny a Type III land use application. The decision must be based on, and be <br />accompanied by, findings that explain the criteria and standards considered relevant to the <br />decision. It must also state the facts relied upon in rendering the decision and explain the <br />justification for the decision based upon the criteria, standards, and facts set forth. <br />The Hearings Official will review the application and consider relevant evidence and testimony <br />as to whether the proposed Zone Change is consistent with the applicable criteria required for <br />approval, shown below in bold typeface. To assist the Hearings Official in making a decision on <br />the Zone Change request, staff's findings in response to each of the criteria are provided below. <br />EC 9.8865(1): The proposed change is consistent with applicable provisions of the <br />Metro Plan. The written text of the Metro Plan shall take precedence over the Metro <br />Plan diagram where apparent conflicts or inconsistencies exist. <br />The applicant is requesting approval to change the base zone of the subject property from <br />Agricultural (AG) to Low-Density Residential (R-1). The Metro Plan diagram designates the <br />subject property for Low-Density Residential uses, which is implemented through the proposed <br />R-1 zoning, making the applicant's request consistent with the Metro Plan diagram. <br />Staff does not see any specific policies from the Metro Plan that would serve as mandatory <br />approval criteria for the applicant's request. Based on the available information, the request <br />complies with this criterion. <br />Staff Report <br />Claire Senderling I Z 22-2 <br />Page 5 of 41 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.